Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:26:15.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporatism is Dead! Long Live Corporatism!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Philippe C. Schmitter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

ANDREW SHONFIELD DID NOT DISCOVER THE HIDDEN AFFINITY between modern corporatism and modern capitalism. John Maynard Keynes should probably be credited with that insight, even if it is contained in just a paragraph cited in part by Shonfield) in his essay: The End of Laissez-Faire. Mihail Manoilesco, an economist of lesser renown and much less reputable politics, was probably the first to offer a systematic argument to this effect, but he located its site on the periphery of European capitalism and (mistakenly) believed that it could only be brought into existence through imposition from above, either by the state bureaucracy or by ‘un parti unique.’ For a while, Mussolini's corporativismo seemed to prove him right. With its ignominious collapse, the concept disappeared from respectable political discourse -except as an insult to throw at one's opponents.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , 01 January 1989 , pp. 54 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Keynes, John Maynard, The End of haissez-Faire, London, Hogarth Press, 1926.Google Scholar

2 Manoilesco, Mihail, Le Siècle du Corporatisme, Paris, Alcan, 1934; he Parti Unique, Paris, Mean, 1936.Google Scholar

3 Shonfield, Andrew, Modem Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

4 ibid., p. 194.

5 ibid., p. 160.

6 ibid., p. 164.

7 ibid., p. 161.

8 Panitch, Leo, ‘The Development of Corporatism in Liberal Democracies’, in Schmitter, P. and Lehmbruch, G. (eds), Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, London, Sage, 1979, pp. 119–46.Google Scholar

9 In Defence of the Mixed Economy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1984.

10 ibid., p. 127.

11 ibid., p. 127, 134.

12 ibid.

13 Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1982, p. 102

14 ibid., p. 152.

15 Schmidt, Cf. Manfred, ‘Does Corporatism Matter? Economic Crisis, Politics and Rates of Unemployment in the Capitalist Democracies in the 1970s’, in Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe C. (eds), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, London, Sage, 1982, pp. 237–58.Google Scholar

16 Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1987.

17 Pempel, T. J. and Tsunekawa, K., ‘Corporatism without Labour? The Japanese Anomaly’, in Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard (eds), Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, London, Sage, 1979, pp. 231—70.Google Scholar

18 In Defence of the Mixed Economy, p. 131.

19 Schmitter, Philippe C. and Streeck, Wolfgang, A Research Design for the Study of Business Associations, Berlin, Wissenschaftszentrum-IIM, 1981.Google Scholar

20 p. vi.

21 Streeck, Wolfgang and Schmitter, Philippe C. (eds), Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State, London, Sage, 1985.Google Scholar

22 Reflections on Where the Theory of Neo-Corporatism Has Gone and Where the Praxis of Neo-Corporatism May Be Going’, in Lehmbruch, G. and Schmitter, P. (eds), Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making, London, Sage, 1982, pp. 259—90.Google Scholar

23 Hernes, Gudmund and Selvik, A., ‘Local Corporatism’ in Berger, S. (ed.), Organizing Interests in Western Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1981, pp. 103—19.Google Scholar

24 Cawson, Alan (ed.), Organized Interests and the State: Studies in Meso-Corporatism, London, Sage, 1985.Google Scholar

25 4 July 1987.

26 ibid.

27 Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lanzalalco, Luca, ‘L’organizzazione degli interessi empren-ditorali a livello regionale’, Stato e Mercato, No. 22, 1988, pp. 63—96.Google Scholar

28 Scharpf, Fritz, ‘Die Politikverflechtungsfalle: Europäische Integration und deutscher Föderalismus im Vergleich’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 26, 12 1985, pp. 323–56.Google Scholar

29 In Defence of the Mixed Economy, p. vi.