Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T07:23:16.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coding Historical Qualitative Cases and Explaining Outcomes: A Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2017

Scott Mainwaring
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This rejoinder responds to Kenneth Roberts’s criticisms of my review published in these pages in August 2016. Roberts’s book, Changing Course, is a major contribution to scholarship on Latin American party systems, but Roberts and I disagree about three key issues. Firstly, because Roberts measured the economic effects of different kinds of party systems beginning in 1980, his coding of party systems must be immediately prior to that. Secondly, Roberts and I agree that many Latin American party systems exhibited deep change during the long era of important substitution industrialization (roughly 1940–80). In my judgement, the coding of party systems should reflect these changes more than Changing Course does. Thirdly, following principles for understanding causation, I argue that Changing Course does not conclusively show that labour-mobilizing party systems caused deeper economic crises and greater party system instability than elitist party systems.

Keywords

Latin American party systemscoding historical qualitative casesunderstanding causation
Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 549 - 557
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Scott Mainwaring is the Jorge Paulo Lemann Professor at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. Contact email: [email protected].

References

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (1985), ‘Preliminary Overview of the Latin American Economy during 1985’, http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/31674/S8500261_en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar
Lupu, N. (2016), Party Brands in Crisis: Partisanship, Brand Dilution, and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. (2016), ‘Party System Institutionalization, Party Collapse and Party Building’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 51(4): 691–716.Google Scholar
Roberts, K.M. (2014), Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Roberts, K.M. (2017), ‘Periodization and Party System Institutionalization in Latin America: A Reply to Mainwaring’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, April, published early online, doi: 10.1017/gov.2017.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K.M. and Wibbels, E. (1999), ‘Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America’, American Political Science Review, 93(3): 575–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seawright, J. (2012), Party System Collapse (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar