Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:41:50.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Changeableness of Subnational Constitutions: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2017

Werner Reutter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why have some German Land constitutions been changed more frequently than others? This is the basic research question addressed in this article. In addition and maybe even more importantly, for the first time the article will apply fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to the study of comparative constitutional policy, and thus will investigate what conditions explain the changeableness of subnational constitutions. Overall, I will argue that subnational constitutional policy is not just a manifestation of Germany’s consensus democracy. On the contrary, it seems that a crucial element of majoritarian democracy – that is, a low number of effective parties – appears to be a core condition for the changeableness of constitutions. In addition, the findings suggest that any theory striving to explain the frequency and scope of constitutional amendments in a comparative perspective should include both institutional and party factors.

Keywords

comparative constitutional politicsGerman federalismconsensus democracymajoritarian democracyfuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 75 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Werner Reutter is a Lecturer in Politics at the University of Leipzig. Contact email: [email protected].

References

Arvind, T.T. and Stirton, L. (2010), ‘Explaining the Reception of the Code Napoleon in Germany: A Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis’, Legal Studies, 30(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Benz, A. (1985), Föderalismus als dynamisches System (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).Google Scholar
Berg-Schlosser, D. and DeMeur, G. (2009), ‘Case and Variable Selection’, in B. Rihoux and C.C. Ragin (eds), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Los Angeles: Sage): 19–32.Google Scholar
Berg-Schlosser, D., DeMeur, G., Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C.C. (2009), ‘Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an Approach’, in B. Rihoux and C.C. Ragin (eds), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Los Angeles: Sage): 1–18.Google Scholar
Beutler, B. (1977), Das Staatsbild in den Länderverfassungen nach 1945 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot).Google Scholar
Burgess, M. and Tarr, G.A. (2012), ‘Introduction: Sub-national Constitutionalism and Constitutional Development’, in M. Burgess and G.A. Tarr (eds), Constitutional Dynamics in Federal States: Sub-national Perspectives (Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press): 1–39.Google Scholar
Busch, A. (2006), ‘Verfassungspolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’, in M.G. Schmidt and R. Zohlnhöfer (eds), Regieren in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Innen- und Außenpolitik seit 1949 (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag): 33–56.Google Scholar
Contiades, X. and Fotiadou, A. (2013), ‘Models of Constitutional Change’, in X. Contiades (ed.), Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA (London: Routledge): 417–468.Google Scholar
Dinan, J. (2012), ‘State Constitutions and American Political Development’, in M. Burgess and G.A. Tarr (eds), Constitutional Dynamics in Federal States: Sub-national Perspectives (Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press): 43–60.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J. (1997), ‘The Politics of Imperfection: The Amendments of Constitutions’, Law and Social Inquiry, 22(2): 501–531.Google Scholar
Flick, M. (2008), ‘Landesverfassungen und ihre Veränderbarkeit’, in M. Freitag and A. Vatter (eds), Die Demokratien der deutschen Bundesländer (Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich): 221–236.Google Scholar
Freitag, M. and Vatter, A. (2008), ‘Die Bundesländer zwischen Konsensus- und Mehrheitsdemokratie: Eine Verortung entlang ihrer politisch-institutionellen Konfigurationen’, in M. Freitag and A. Vatter (eds), Die Demokratien der Deutschen Bundesländer (Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich): 309–328.Google Scholar
Geddes, B. (2003), Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Grassi, D. and Luppi, F. (2014), ‘Do We Live Longer and Healthier Lives under Democracy? A Configurational Comparative Analysis of Latin America’, COMPASSS Working Paper 2014-78, www.compasss.org/wpseries/GrassiLuppi2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Gunlicks, A.B. (2003), The Länder and German Federalism (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
Hirschl, R. (2005), ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 53(1): 125–155.Google Scholar
Jeffery, C., Pamphilis, N.M., Rowe, C. and Turner, E. (2014), ‘Regional Policy Variation in Germany: The Diversity of Living Conditions in a “Unitary Federal State”’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21(9): 1350–1366.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P.J. (1987), Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semi-sovereign State (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).Google Scholar
Koole, K. and Vis, B. (2012), ‘Working Mothers and the State: Under Which Conditions do Governments Spend Much on Maternal Employment Supporting Policies?’, VU University Amsterdam COMPASSS Working Paper 2012-71, www.compasss.org/wpseries/KooleVis2012.pdf.Google Scholar
Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R. (1979), ‘“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Applications to West Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 12(1): 3–27.Google Scholar
Legewie, N. (2013), ‘An Introduction to Applied Data Analysis with Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 14 (3), www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1961/3595.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Loewenstein, K. (1961), Über Wesen, Technik und Grenzen der Verfassungsänderung (Berlin: de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Lorenz, A. (2005), ‘How to Measure Constitutional Rigidity: Four Concepts and Two Alternatives’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17(3): 339–361.Google Scholar
Lorenz, A. (2008), Verfassungsänderungen in etablierten Demokratien: Motivlagen und Aushandlungsmuster (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag).Google Scholar
Lorenz, A. and Reutter, W. (2012), ‘Subconstitutionalism in a Multilayered System: A Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Politics in the German Länder’, Perspectives on Federalism, 4(2): 141–170.Google Scholar
Lutz, D.S. (1994), ‘Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment’, American Political Science Review, 88(2): 355–370.Google Scholar
Maggetti, M. and Levi-Faur, D. (2013), ‘Dealing with Errors in QCA’, Political Research Quarterly, 66(1): 198–204.Google Scholar
Möstl, M. (2005), ‘Landesverfassungsrecht – zum Schattendasein verurteilt? Eine Positionsbestimmung im bundesstaatlichen und supranationalen Verfassungsverbund’, Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, 130(3): 350–391.Google Scholar
Pestalozza, C. (2014a), ‘Einführung’, in C. Pestalozza (ed.), Verfassungen der deutschen Bundesländer mit dem Grundgesetz, 10th edn (Munich: C.H. Beck): XVII–CXLVII.Google Scholar
Pestalozza, C. (2014b) (ed.), Verfassungen der deutschen Bundesländer mit dem Grundgesetz, 10th edn (Munich: C.H. Beck).Google Scholar
Ragin, C.C. (1987), The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Ragin, C.C. (2000), Fuzzy-Set Social Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Ragin, C.C. (2009), ‘Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets (fsQCA)’, in B. Rihoux and C.C. Ragin (eds), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques (Los Angeles: Sage ): 87–122.Google Scholar
Ragin, C.C. (2010), ‘User’s Guide to Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 2.0’, Department of Sociology, University of California, www.u.arizona.edu/~cragin/fsQCA/download/fsQCAManual.pdf.Google Scholar
Ragin, C.C. and Davey, S. (2014), Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 2.5, computer program, Department of Sociology, University of California.Google Scholar
Reutter, W. (2008), ‘Verfassunggebung und Verfassungsänderungen in den Ländern’, Jahrbuch des Föderalismus 2008: Föderalismus, Subsidiarität und Regionen in Europa (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft): 239–253.Google Scholar
Reutter, W. (2010), ‘“Grand Coalition State”, Große Koalition und Föderalismusreform’, in S. Bukow and W. Seemann (eds), Die Große Koalition (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften): 85–101.Google Scholar
Reutter, W. (2014), ‘Sächsische Verfassungspolitik’, Jahrbuch des Föderalismus 2014: Föderalismus, Subsidiarität und Regionen in Europa (Baden-Baden: Nomos): 255–268.Google Scholar
Reutter, W. (2015a), ‘Bayerische Verfassungspolitik’, Jahrbuch des Föderalismus 2015: Föderalismus, Subsidiarität und Regionen in Europa (Baden-Baden: Nomos): 215–227.Google Scholar
Reutter, W. (2015b), ‘Verfassungsgesetzgebung in Brandenburg’, Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 46(1): 108–127.Google Scholar
Reutter, W. and Lorenz, A. (2016), ‘Explaining Constitutional Change in the German Länder’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 46(1): 103–127.Google Scholar
Rihoux, B., Rezsöhaz, I. and Bol, D. (2011), ‘Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in Public Policy Analysis: An Extensive Review’, German Policy Studies, 7(3): 7–82.Google Scholar
Rihoux, B., Álamos-Concha, P., Bol, D., Marx, A. and Rezsöhazy, I. (2013), ‘From Niche to Mainstream Method? A Comprehensive Mapping of QCA Applications in Journal Articles from 1984 to 2011’, Political Research Quarterly, 66(1): 175–184.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. (2009), ‘The Politics of Constitutional Amendment in Postcommunist Europe’, Constitutional Political Economy, 20(1): 99–117.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.G. (1987), ‘West Germany: The Politics of the Middle Way’, Journal of Public Policy, 7(2): 139–177.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.G. (2008), ‘Germany: The Grand Coalition State’, in J.M. Colomer (ed.), Comparative European Politics, 3rd edn (London: Routledge): 58–93.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M.G. (2011), Das politische System Deutschlands: Institutionen, Willensbildung und Politikfelder (Munich: C.H. Beck).Google Scholar
Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2007), Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) und Fuzzy Sets: Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen (Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich).Google Scholar
Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2010), ‘Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets’, Comparative Sociology, 9(3): 397–418.Google Scholar
Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2013), ‘Doing Justice to Logical Remainders in QCA: Moving Beyond the Standard Analysis’, Political Research Quarterly, 66(1): 211–220.Google Scholar
Schniewind, A. (2008), ‘Regierungen’, in M. Freitag and A. Vatter (eds), Die Demokratien der deutschen Bundesländer (Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich): 111–160.Google Scholar
Tarr, G.A. (2000), Understanding State Constitutions (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Tarr, G.A. (2014), ‘Explaining State Constitutional Change’, Wayne Law Review, 60(1): 9–30.Google Scholar
Wagemann, C. and Schneider, C.Q. (2007), ‘Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy Sets’, COMPASSS Working Paper 2007-51, www.compasss.org/wpseries/WagemannSchneider2007.pdf.Google Scholar
Williams, R.F. and Tarr, G.A. (2004), ‘Subnational Constitutional Space: A View from the States, Provinces, Regions, Länder, and Cantons’, in G.A. Tarr, R.F. Williams and J. Marko (eds), Federalism, Subnational Constitutions, and Minority Rights (Westport, CT: Praeger): 3–24.Google Scholar