Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T13:25:40.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cabinet Reshuffles in Latin America: A Function of Presidential Reputation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2022

Magna Inácio Open the ORCID record for Magna Inácio [Opens in a new window] ,
Mariana Llanos Open the ORCID record for Mariana Llanos [Opens in a new window]  and
Bruno Pinheiro Open the ORCID record for Bruno Pinheiro [Opens in a new window]
Magna Inácio*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Mariana Llanos
Affiliation:
German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg, Germany
Bruno Pinheiro
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article we propose an innovative comparative analysis of cabinet reshuffles in Latin American presidential systems, focusing on personal incentives as drivers of ministerial turnover. We analyse when and why risks of reputational damage to a president drive cabinet changes. These risks are contingent and dependent upon the interaction between a president's reputational assets, on the one hand, and the high ‘walk-away value’ of the minister, on the other. We argue that ministerial turnover is a function of presidents' political and reputational resources as well as of exogenous factors. However, who is fired from the cabinet depends on the ministers' walk-away values and how threatened the president feels by them. We analyse cabinet changes in single-party and multiparty presidential governments in Latin America. Our results confirm the explanatory power of personal incentives to better understand the mechanisms that drive cabinet reshuffles.

Keywords

cabinet reshufflepresidentspresidential cabinetreputationLatin America
Type
Article
Information
Government and Opposition , First View , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Government and Opposition Limited

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, B (2004) The Emergency Constitution. Yale Law Journal 113(5), 1029–1091. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcántara, M, Barragán, M and Sánchez, F (2017) Political Career Trajectories and Social Backgrounds. In Alcántara, M, Blondel, J and Thiébault, J-L (eds), Presidents and Democracy in Latin America, 1st edn. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 73–88.10.4324/9781315112664-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, D (2015) Ideologues, Partisans, and Loyalists: Cabinet Ministers and Social Welfare Reform in Parliamentary Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 48(8), 1051–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015574880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim Neto, O and Samuels, D (2010) Democratic Regimes and Cabinet Politics: A Global Perspective. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos Legislativos 1(1), 10–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.12660/riel.v1.n1.2010.4123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäck, H and Carroll, R (2020) The Distribution of Ministerial Posts in Parliamentary Systems. In Andeweg, RB, Elgie, R, Helms, L, Kaarbo, J and Müller-Rommel, F (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Executives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 314–335.Google Scholar
Basabe-Serrano, S, Polga-Hecimovich, J and Mejía Acosta, A (2018) Unilateral No Matter What: Portfolio Allocation in Ecuador (1979–2015). In Camerlo, M and Martínez-Gallardo, C (eds), Government Formation and Minister Turnover in Presidential Cabinets: Comparative Analysis in the Americas. Abingdon: Routledge Press, pp. 182–206.Google Scholar
Baturo, A and Elkink, JA (2021) What Countries Select More Experienced Leaders? The PolEx Measure of Political Experience. British Journal of Political Science, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlinski, S, Dewan, T and Dowding, K (2010) The Impact of Individual and Collective Performance on Ministerial Tenure. Journal of Politics 72(2), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609990843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerlo, M and Martinez-Gallardo, C (2018) Government Formation and Minister Turnover in Presidential Cabinets. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Camerlo, M and Pérez-Liñán, A (2015) The Politics of Minister Retention in Presidential Systems: Technocrats, Partisans, and Government Approval. Comparative Politics 47(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041515814709310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, M (2012) The Rise of Outsiders in Latin America, 1980–2010: An Institutionalist Perspective. Comparative Political Studies 45(12), 1451–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, M (2017) Institutions, Governmental Performance and the Rise of Political Newcomers. European Journal of Political Research 56(2), 364–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejpr.2017.56.issue-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaisty, P, Cheeseman, N and Power, T (2018) Coalitional Presidentialism in Comparative Perspective: Minority Presidents in Multiparty Systems, new edn. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasquetti, D (2001) Democracia, Multipartidismo y Coaliciones En América Latina: Evaluando La Difícil Combinación. In Lanzaro, J (ed.), Tipos de Presidencialismo y Coaliciones Políticas En América Latina. Buenos Aires: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales/CLACSO, pp. 319–359.Google Scholar
Chasquetti, D and Buquet, D (2018) Parliamentary Style: Portfolio Allocation in Uruguay (1967–2015). In Camerlo, M and Martínez-Gallardo, C (eds), Government Formation and Minister Turnover in Presidential Cabinets: Comparative Analysis in the Americas. Abingdon: Routledge Press, pp. 67–89.Google Scholar
Cheibub, JA, Hong, JYJ and Przeworski, A (2020) Rights and Deaths: Government Reactions to the Pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3645410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewan, T and Dowding, K (2005) The Corrective Effect of Ministerial Resignations on Government Popularity. American Journal of Political Science 49(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00109.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewan, T and Myatt, DP (2007) Scandal, Protection, and Recovery in the Cabinet. American Political Science Review 101(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, JI (ed.) (1997) Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Elgie, R (2020) Presidents and Cabinets. In Andeweg, RB, Elgie, R, Helms, L, Kaarbo, J and Müller-Rommel, F (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Executives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 402–419.Google Scholar
Feenstra, RC, Inklaar, R and Timmer, MP (2015) The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review 105(10), 3150–3182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortunato, D (2019) Legislative Review and Party Differentiation in Coalition Governments. American Political Science Review 113(1), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541800062X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenreich, J (2016) The Formation of Cabinet Coalitions in Presidential Systems. Latin American Politics and Society 58(4), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/laps.12003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T and Versteeg, M (2021) The Bound Executive: Emergency Powers during the Pandemic. International Journal of Constitutional Law 19(5), 1498–1535. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moab059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Bustamante, B (2020) The Politics–Administration Dichotomy: A Case Study of the Chilean Executive during the Democratic Post-Transition. Bulletin of Latin American Research 39(5), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, L (2016) The Politics of Leadership Capital in Compound Democracies: Inferences from the German Case. European Political Science Review 8(2), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773915000016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, L and Vercesi, M (2022) Cabinet Reshuffles in Parliamentary Democracies: A Typology and Framework for Comparative Analysis. Government and Opposition, Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2022.22.Google Scholar
Huber, JD and Martinez-Gallardo, C (2004) Cabinet Instability and the Accumulation of Experience: The French Fourth and Fifth Republics in Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science 34(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123403000334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, JD and Martinez-Gallardo, C (2008) Replacing Cabinet Ministers: Patterns of Ministerial Stability in Parliamentary Democracies. American Political Science Review 102(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540808012X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inácio, M (2013) Escogiendo Ministros y Formando Políticos: Los Partidos En Gabinetes Multipartidistas. América Latina Hoy 64, 41–66. https://doi.org/10.14201/alh.10231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inácio, M (2018) Presidentially-Led Coalitions: Portfolio Allocation in Brazil (1985–2016). In Camerlo, M and Martínez-Gallardo, C (eds), Government Formation and Minister Turnover in Presidential Cabinets: Comparative Analysis in the Americas. Abingdon: Routledge Press, pp. 111–138.Google Scholar
Inácio, M and Llanos, M (2016) The Institutional Presidency in Latin America: A Comparative Analysis. Presidential Studies Quarterly 46(3), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inácio, M and Llanos, M (2020) Presidential Pathways and Profiles. In Andeweg, RB, Elgie, R, Helms, L, Kaarbo, J and Müller-Rommel, F (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Executives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 207–228.Google Scholar
Indridason, IH and Kam, C (2008) Cabinet Reshuffles and Ministerial Drift. British Journal of Political Science 38(4), 621–656. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M and Shepsle, KA (1990) Coalitions and Cabinet Government. American Political Science Review 84(3), 873–890. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limongi, F and Figueiredo, A (1998) Bases Institucionais Do Presidencialismo de Coalizão. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política (44), 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, A and Strøm, K (2008) Bargaining, Transaction Costs, and Coalition Governance. In Strøm, K, Müller, WC and Bergman, T (eds), Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51–83.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S and Shugart, MS (1997) Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, LW and Vanberg, G (2011) Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Gallardo, C and Schleiter, P (2015) Choosing Whom to Trust: Agency Risks and Cabinet Partisanship in Presidential Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 48(2), 231–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014544361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, I (2007) The Personalization of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejía Guinand, LB and Botero, F (2018) Bait and Switch? Portfolio Allocation in Colombia (1958–2014). In Camerlo, M and Martínez-Gallardo, C (eds), Government Formation and Minister Turnover in Presidential Cabinets: Comparative Analysis in the Americas. Abingdon: Routledge Press, pp. 139–158.Google Scholar
Negretto, GL (2013) Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, OA (2006) The Presidential Calculus. Comparative Political Studies 39(4), 415–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005282381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nino, C (1992) El Hiperpresidencialismo Argentino y Las Concepciones de La Democracia. In Nino, C, Gargarella, R et al. (eds), El Presidencialismo Puesto A Prueba. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, pp. 17–80.Google Scholar
Nyrup, J and Bramwell, S (2020) Who Governs? A New Global Dataset on Members of Cabinets. American Political Science Review 114(4), 1366–1374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, GA (1994) Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy 5(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, A (2006) Evaluating Presidential Runoff Elections. Electoral Studies 25(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponder, DE (2012) Presidential Leverage and the Politics of Policy Formulation. Presidential Studies Quarterly 42(2), 300–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.03967.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, D and Shugart, MS (2010) Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleiter, P (2020) Government Formation and Termination. In Andeweg, RB, Elgie, R, Helms, L, Kaarbo, J and Müller-Rommel, F (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Executives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 293–313.Google Scholar
Sedelius, T and Ekman, J (2010) Intra-Executive Conflict and Cabinet Instability: Effects of Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics 45(4), 505–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2010.01325.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, MS and Carey, JM (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vera, S and Carreras, M (2018) Cooperative but Non-Partisan: Portfolio Allocation in Peru (1980–2014). In Camerlo, M and Martínez-Gallardo, C (eds), Government Formation and Minister Turnover in Presidential Cabinets: Comparative Analysis in the Americas. Abingdon: Routledge Press, pp. 159–181.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Inácio et al. supplementary material

Appendix

Download Inácio et al. supplementary material(File)
File 146.1 KB