³ Jackie Stacey, ‘Feminist Theory: Capital F, Capital T’, in Victoria Robinson and Diane Richardson (eds), Introducing Women's Studies, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1997. p. 64.Google Scholar

⁴ The British Women's Liberation Movement adopted six demands, the fifth of which was for legal and financial independence.Google Scholar

⁵ When we finally disbanded, exhausted from the hard work of campaigning, I joined some other women in a women's group that met regularly to talk about politi- cal and personal issues. The group was an anchor in our lives and we still meet for reunion dinners when we debate the personal and the political as animatedly as ever.Google Scholar

⁶ Rake, K., ‘Winning Against Men or Changing the Rules?’, Renewal, 12: 3 (2004), p. 11.Google Scholar

⁷ The distinction between ‘ontological’ and ‘categorical’ identity is made by Taylor, David, ‘Social Identity and Social Policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 27: 3 (1998), pp. 329–50;CrossRefGoogle Scholar the addition of ‘relational’ identity is taken from Fiona Williams, ‘A Conceptual Chart for CAVA, 2000’, at www.leeds.ac.uk/cava/paper16fiona.htm and Shona Hunter, ‘A Critical Analysis of Approaches to the Concept of Social Identity in Social Policy’, Critical Social Policy, 23: 3 (2003), pp. 322–44.

⁸ Tom Digby (ed.), Men Doing Feminism, New York and London, Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

⁹ D. J. Kahane, ‘Male Feminism as Oxymoron’, in Digby, Men Doing Feminism, p. 231.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Ibid., p. 213.Google Scholar

¹¹ S. Harding, ‘Can Men be Subjects of Feminist Thought?’, in Digby, Men Doing Feminism, pp. 171–95.Google Scholar

¹² T. Digby, ‘Introduction’, Digby, Men Doing Feminism, pp. 1–14; 3, 5, 1.Google Scholar

¹³ Squires, Judith, ‘Representing Groups, Deconstructing Identities’, Feminist Theory, 2: 1 (2001), pp. 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴ For a discussion see R. Lister, Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, 2nd edn, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2003, ch. 4.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Anne Phillips, Democracy and Difference, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1993, p. 45.Google Scholar

¹⁶ It also challenged the sex–gender distinction on the grounds that the biological and the social cannot be separated in this way for sex, as well as gender, is not ‘natural’ but socially constructed.Google Scholar

¹⁷ D. Riley, Am I that Name?, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1988.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Women were constructed as equal to men under liberal and Marxist/socialist feminism and as different from them by radical feminists. For an account of the different strands of feminism, see V. Bryson, Feminist Political Theory. An Introduction, 2nd edn, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2003.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Lee Comer, Wedlocked Women, Leeds, Feminist Books, 1974, pp. 274–5, cited in Lynne Segal, Is the Future Female?, London, Virago, 1987.Google Scholar

²⁰ Lynne Segal, Why Feminism?, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1999, pp. 15–16, emphasis in original.Google Scholar

²¹ S. Faludi, Backlash, London, Vintage, 1992.Google Scholar

²² M. Barrett, ‘Post-feminism’, in G. Browing, A. Halcli and F. Webster (eds), Understanding Contemporary Society, London, Sage, 2000, p. 46.Google Scholar

²³ McRobbie, A., ‘Post-feminism and Popular Culture’, Feminist Media Studies, 4: 3 (2004), pp. 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁴ Valerie Bryson, Feminist Debates, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1999, p. 5.Google Scholar

²⁵ Hewitt was UK minister for women and trade and industry secretary at the time of writing. She was speaking at a round-table discussion, ‘Debating Feminism: What Do We Make of the “F” Word Now?’, Renewal, 12: 2 (2004), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

²⁶ McRobbie, Angela, ‘Feminism and the Third Way’, Feminist Review, 64 (Spring 2000), p. 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁷ Brid Featherstone, Family Life and Family Support. A Feminist Analysis, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2004, p. 42.Google Scholar

²⁸ N. Walter, The New Feminism, London, Little, Brown, 1998, p. 33.Google Scholar

²⁹ Jackson, S., ‘Why a Materialist Feminism is (Still) Possible – and Necessary’, Women's Studies International Forum, 24: 3/4, p. 286.Google Scholar

³⁰ Stacey, J., ‘The Empress of Feminist Theory is Overdressed’, Feminist Theory, 2: 1 (2001, p. 101.Google Scholar

³¹ M. J. Alexander and C. T. Mohanty, ‘Introduction: Genealogies, Legacies, Movements’, in M. J. Alexander and C. T. Mohanty (eds), Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures, New York and London, Routledge, 1997, pp. xiii–xliii.Google Scholar

³² In a very different context, Eastern European women have also sometimes been resistant to the claims of Western feminism.Google Scholar

³³ C. Mohanty, ‘Feminist Encounters’ in M. Barrett and A. Phillips, Destabilizing Theory. Contemporary Feminist Debates, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1992, pp. 74–92.Google Scholar

³⁴ See, Walby, Sylvia, ‘Feminism in a Global Era’, Economy and Society, 31: 4 (2002), pp. 533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar However, not all feminists would sign up to the notion of universal human rights.

³⁵ C. Bunch with P. Antrobus, S. Frost and N. Reilly, ‘International Networking for Women's Human Rights’, in M. Edwards and J. Gaventa (eds), Global Citizen Action, Boulder, CO, Lynne Rienner, 2001, pp. 228, 227.Google Scholar

³⁶ B. Ehrenreich and A. R. Hochschild, ‘Introduction’, in B. Ehrenreich and A. R. Hochschild (eds), Global Woman, London, Granta Books, 2003, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

³⁷ A. McRobbie, Feminism and Youth Culture, 2nd edn, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 2000.Google Scholar

³⁸ McRobbie, ‘Post-feminism and Popular Culture’.Google Scholar

³⁹ Barrett, ‘Post-feminism’, p. 48.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ N. Wolf, Fire with Fire, the New Female Power and How it Will Change the 21st Century, London, Chatto & Windus, 1993, pp. xvi and 147.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Ibid., p. 57.Google Scholar

⁴² Ibid., pp. 58 and 149.Google Scholar

⁴³ Walter, The New Feminism, pp. 4 and 76.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ McRobbie, A., ‘The Rise and Rise of Porn Chic’, The Times Higher, 2 (January 2004), p. 14.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Lister, R., ‘The Dilemmas of Pendulum Politics: Balancing Paid Work, Care and Citizenship’, Economy and Society, 31: 4 (2002), pp. 520–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁶ A. Coote and B. Campbell, Sweet Freedom. The Struggle for Women's Liberation, London, Picador, 1982, p. 243.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ ‘What is the F-Word?’, at www.thefword.org.uk.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Talk by Geethika Jayatilaka at ‘Rebranding Feminism’ evening at the Institute for Contemporary Arts, London, 30 November 2001, at www.thefword.org.uk.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ ‘Soundbites; A Third Wave?’, at www.thefword.org.uk.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Segal, Is the Future Female?, pp. 57–8.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Wolf, Fire with Fire, p. 149.Google Scholar

⁵² J. Squires, ‘Rethinking the Boundaries of Political Representation’, in S. Walby (ed.), New Agendas for Women, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1999, p. 174.Google Scholar

⁵³ Squires, ‘Representing Groups, Deconstructing Identities’, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ R. Aziz, ‘Feminism and the Challenge of Racism: Deviance or Difference?’, in H. Crowley and S. Himmelweit (eds), Knowing Women, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 299–300.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ For the latest version of her thesis, see N. Fraser and A. Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition?, London, Verso, 2003.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Ibid., p. 33, and N. Fraser, ‘Rethinking Recognition’, in B. Hobson (ed.), Recognition Struggles and Social Movements. Contested Identities, Agency and Power, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Lister, Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, p. 81.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ b. hooks, Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, Boston, South End Press, 2000, p. 65.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ J. Dean, ‘The Reflective Solidarity of Democratic Feminism’, in J. Dean (ed.), Feminism and the New Democracy, London, Sage, 1997.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ J. Dean, Solidarity of Strangers. Feminism After Identity Politics, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar

⁶¹ N. Yuval-Davis, Gender & Nation, London, Sage, 1997, and Yuval-Davis, N., ‘What is “Transversal Politics”?’, Soundings, 12 (1999), pp. 94–8.Google Scholar

⁶² Cockburn, Cynthia and Hunter, Lynette, ‘Transversal Politics and Translating Practices’, Soundings, 12 (1999), p. 88.Google Scholar

⁶³ Patel, P., ‘Difficult Alliances. Treading the Minefield of Identity and Solidarity Politics’, Soundings, 12 (1999), pp. 116–17.Google Scholar See also R. Gupta (ed.), From Homebreakers to Jailbreakers. Southall Black Sisters, London and New York, Zed Press, 2003.

⁶⁴ Elizabeth Porter, ‘Participatory Democracy and the Challenge of Dialogue across Difference’, in C. Roulston and C. Davies (eds), Gender, Democracy and Inclusion in Northern Ireland, Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2000, pp. 155 and 154.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Northern Ireland Women's Coalition, Common Cause. The Story of the Northern Ireland Women's Coalition, Belfast, NIWC, undated, p. 12.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ C. Cockburn, The Space Between Us. Negotiating Gender and National Identities in Conflict, London and New York, Zed Press, 1998, p. 9.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Cockburn, C., ‘Different Together: Women in Belfast’, Soundings, 2 (1996), p. 46.Google Scholar