Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:00:36.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where’s the Party? The Decline of Party Institutionalization and What (if Anything) that Means for Democracy1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Steven I. Wilkinson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Strong institutionalized parties are often seen as vital for healthy democracies. The Indian case, therefore, represents a strange paradox: many parties are weak, corrupt and personalistic, yet democracy as a whole seems to be thriving, with increasing turnout and apparently strong popular support for democratic procedures and norms. This article explores some of the reasons for this strange outcome and suggests that the existing literature on party institutionalization might need some revision.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 50 , Special Issue 3: 50th Anniversary Special Issue THE FUTURE OF DEMOCRACY , July 2015 , pp. 420 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Steven I. Wilkinson is Nilekani Professor of India and South Asian Studies in the Department of Political Science, Yale University. Contact email: [email protected].

1

This title, ‘Where’s the Party?’ has been used in a different context by Krehbiel (1993) in a paper on American legislative politics.

References

Abramson, P.R., Aldrich, J.H., Paolino, P. and Rohde, D.W. (2000), ‘Challenges to the American Two-Party System: Evidence from the 1968, 1980, 1992, and 1996 Presidential Elections’, Political Research Quarterly, 53(3): 495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, S. (2003), ‘Electoral and Party Competition: Analytical Dimensions and Empirical Problems’, in R. Gunther, J. Ramon Montero and J.J. Linz (eds), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 84–110.Google Scholar
Bartolini, S. and Mair, P. (1990), Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885–1985 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Baru, S. (2014), The Accidental Prime Minister: The Making and Unmaking of Manmohan Singh (New Delhi: Penguin).Google Scholar
CSDS (Centre for the Study of Developing Societies) (2008), State of Democracy in South Asia (New Delhi: CSDS/Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
CSDS (Centre for the Study of Developing Societies) (2014), ‘All India Postpoll 2014 – Survey Findings’, www.lokniti.org/pdf/All-India-Postpoll-2014-Survey-Findings.pdf.Google Scholar
Chandra, K. (2004), Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Chavez, R.B. (2003), ‘The Construction of the Rule of Law in Argentina: A Tale of Two Provinces’, Comparative Politics, 35(4): 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhibber, P. (2011), ‘Dynastic Parties: Organization, Finance and Impact’, Party Politics, 19(2): 277–295.Google Scholar
Chhibber, P., Jensenius, F.R. and Suryanarayan, P. (2012), ‘Party Organization and Party Proliferation in India’, Party Politics, 20(4): 489–505.Google Scholar
Crowley, D.J. (1963), ‘Politics and Tribalism in the Katanga’, Western Political Quarterly, 16(1): 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doron, A. and Jeffrey, R. (2013), The Great Indian Phone Book: How the Cheap Cell Phone Changes Business, Politics and Daily Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Express News Service (2014), ‘Home Minister is Quietly Cut out of Senior Officers’ Appointments’, Indian Express, 13 August, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/home-minister-is-quietly-cut-out-of-senior-officers-appointments.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. (2002), ‘Parties and Partisanship: A 40 Year Retrospective’, Political Behavior, 24(2): 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, H.E. (2006), Why not Parties in Russia? Democracy, Federalism and the State (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Heath, A., Glouharova, S. and Heath, A. (2008), ‘India: Two Party Contests Within a Multiparty System’, in M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell (eds), The Politics of Electoral Systems (New York: Oxford University Press): 137–156.Google Scholar
The Hindu (2009), ‘No Barriers to Participation’, 26 May, www.lokniti.org/pdfs_dataunit/ho_%20india_voted_2009/Issues.pdf.Google Scholar
Kapur, D. and Vaishnav, M. (2011), Quid pro quo: Builders, Politicians and Election Finance in India, Center for Global Development Working Paper 276, December, www.cgdev.org/files/1425795_file_Kapur_Vaishnav_election_finance_India_FINAL.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. (2007) (eds), Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H., Mansfeldova, Z., Markowski, R. and Tóka, G. (1999), Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Competition (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, A. (1990), Democracy and Discontent: India’s Growing Crisis of Governability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kothari, R. (1964), ‘The Congress System’, Asian Survey, 4(12): 1161–1173.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, K. (1993), ‘Where’s the Party?’, British Journal of Political Science, 23: 235–266.Google Scholar
Kremer, M., Chaudhury, N., Halsey Rogers, F., Muralidharan, K. and Hammer, J. (2005), ‘Teacher Absence in India: A Snapshot’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2): 658–667.Google Scholar
Kuenzi, M. and Lambright, G. (2005), ‘Party Systems and Democratic Consolidation in Africa’s Electoral Regimes’, Party Politics, 11(4): 423–446.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. and Cameron, M. (2003), ‘Democracy without Parties? Political Parties and Regime Change in Fujimori’s Peru’, Latin American Politics and Society, 45(3): 1–33.Google Scholar
Linz, J.J. (2003), ‘Parties in Contemporary Democracies: Problems and Paradoxes’, in R. Gunther, J.R. Montero and J.J. Linz (eds), Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 291–317.Google Scholar
Low, D.A. (1977), ‘Introduction: The Climactic Years 1917–47’, in D.A. Low (ed.), Congress and the Raj: Facets of the Indian Struggle 1917–47 (London: Heinemann): 7–12.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S. and Scully, T.R. (1995), ‘Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America’, in S. Mainwaring and T.R. Scully (eds), Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America (Stanford: Stanford University Press): 1–34.Google Scholar
Nerurkar, S. (2014), ‘Dynastic Politics is Alive and Well Even in the BJP: Kanchan Chandra’, Times of India, 3 August, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/stoi/all-that-matters/Dynastic-politics-is-alive-and-well-even-in-the-BJP-Kanchan-Chandra/articleshow/39517487.cms.Google Scholar
Panda, B. (2013), ‘Taking Criminals out of Politics’, Business Standard, 27 February.Google Scholar
Planning Commission (2014), ‘Table 58: Gross State Domestic Product at Constant 2004–05 Prices (in Rs. Crore) and Growth (% YoY) as on 31st May 2014’, Planning Commission, Government of India, http://planningcommission.nic.in/data/datatable/0814/table_58.pdf.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. with Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R. (1990), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Randall, V. and Svåsand, L. (2002), ‘Party Institutionalization in New Democracies’, Party Politics, 8(5): 5–29.Google Scholar
Schattsneider, E.E. (1942), Party Government (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).Google Scholar
Weiner, M. (1967), Party Building in a New Nation: The Indian National Congress (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S.I. (2004), Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S.I. (2007), ‘Explaining Changing Patterns of Party Voter Linkages in India’, in H. Kitschelt and S.I. Wilkinson (eds), Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 110–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S.I. (2010), ‘Data and the Study of Indian Politics’, in N.G. Jayal and P.B. Mehta (eds), The Oxford Companion to Politics in India (New Delhi: Oxford University Press): 587–601.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S.I. (2015), Army and Nation: The Military and Indian Democracy since Independence (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S.I. and Onorato, M. (2014), ‘Colonial Democratic Legacies’, mimeo.Google Scholar
Wren, A. and McElwain, K.M. (2009), ‘Voters and Parties’, in C. Boix and S.C. Stokes (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (New York: Oxford University Press): 555–581.Google Scholar
Young, M.C. (1965), Politics in the Congo: Decolonization and Independence (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Young, M.C. (1966), ‘Background to Independence’, Transition, 25: 34–40.Google Scholar
Young, M.C. (1976), The Politics of Cultural Pluralism (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).Google Scholar