² The NRM changed its name to NRM-Organization after the passing of the Political Parties and Organizations Act in 2005 to demarcate between the NRM as a political system and as a political organization. The term NRM is preferred in this article.Google Scholar

³ John Ssenkumba, ‘The Dilemmas of Direct Democracy: Neutralising Ugandan Opposition Politics under the NRM’, in A. O. Olukoshi (ed.), The Politics of Opposition in Contemporary Africa, Uppsala, Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, 1998, p. 172.Google Scholar

⁴ Van De Walle, Nicolas, ‘Elections Without Democracy – Africa's Range of Regimes’, Journal of Democracy, 13: 2 (2002), p. 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ Moehler, Devra C., ‘Participation and Support for the Constitution in Uganda’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 44: 2 (2002), pp. 275–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶ Translates as ‘The King Alone’.Google Scholar

⁷ Kasfir, Nelson, ‘No-Party Democracy in Uganda’, Journal of Democracy, 9: 2 (1998), p. 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸ Muhumuza, William, ‘The 1998 Local Government Elections and Democratization in Uganda’, in Makara, Sabiti, Tukahebwa, Geoffrey B. and Byarugaba, Foster E. (eds), Voting for Democracy in Uganda, Issues in Recent Elections, Kampala, LDC Printing Press, 2003, pp. 227–31.Google Scholar

⁹ The elected leaders of LC I would form an electoral college that elected the LC II committees. This process repeated itself up to the election of the LC V committees.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Representatives of young people, older people and people with disabilities are elected indirectly by members of their own group.Google Scholar

¹¹ Sabiti Makara, Lise Rakner and Lars Svåsand, ‘Turnaround: The National Resistance Movement and the Re-Introduction of a Multiparty System in Uganda’, in J. Kiiza, S. Makara and L. Rakner (eds), Electoral Democracy in Uganda: Understanding the Institutional Dynamics, Processes and Outcomes of the 2006 Multiparty Elections, Kampala, Fountain Publishers, 2008, p. 282.Google Scholar

¹² Carbone, Giovanni M. Political Parties in a “No-Party Democracy”– Hegemony and Opposition under “Movement Democracy” in Uganda’, Party Politics, 9: 4 (2003), p. 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹³ Ibid., p. 488.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Kasfir, ‘No-Party Democracy in Uganda’, pp. 51–2.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Therkildsen, Ole, ‘Uganda's Referendum 2000: The Silent Boycott: A Comment’, African Affairs, 101 (2002), p. 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁶ Bratton, Michael and Lambright, Gina, ‘Uganda's Referendum 2000: The Silent Boycott’, African Affairs, 100, (2001), pp. 429–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Therkildsen, ‘Uganda's Referendum 2000’, p. 240, argues that there should be some reservations about Bratton and Lambright's interpretation of the result, since they ignore the devolution dimension of the movement system and how people's perception of the government system is influenced by this.

¹⁷ Makara, Rakner and Svåsand, ‘Turnaround’.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Ibid.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Adebayo O. Olukoshi, ‘Economic Crisis, Multipartyism, and Opposition Politics in Contemporary Africa’, in Olukoshi, The Politics of Opposition in Contemporary Africa, p. 31.Google Scholar

²⁰ Bratton and Lambright, ‘Uganda's Referendum 2000’, p. 430.Google Scholar

²¹ Randall, Vicky and Svåsand, Lars, ‘Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Africa’, Democratization, 9: 3 (2002), p. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²² Van De Walle, Nicolas, ‘Presidentialism and Clientelism in Africa's Emerging Party Systems’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 41: 2 (2003), p. 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Olukoshi, ‘Economic Crisis, Multipartyism, and Opposition Politics’, pp. 29–30.

²³ Chabal, Patrick and Daloz, Jean-Pascal, Africa Works. Disorder as Political Instrument, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1999, pp. 54–5.Google Scholar

²⁴ Ibid., p. 39.Google Scholar

²⁵ Ibid., pp. 54–6.Google Scholar

²⁶ van de Walle, Nicolas, ‘Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss? The Evolution of Political Clientelism in Africa’, in Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I. (eds), Patron, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 61.Google Scholar

²⁷ Due to the ongoing civil war in Northern Uganda, it was seen as too difficult and unsafe to conduct research in this area.Google Scholar

²⁸ In the 23 February 2006 presidential election Museveni's strongest opponent, Kizza Besigye, received between 72 and 82 per cent of the vote in the northern districts such as Amuira, Apac, Gulu, Kitgum, Lira and Pader.Google Scholar

²⁹ For more information see Anne Ryen, Det kvalitative intervjuet fra vitenskapsteori til feltarbeid [The qualitative interview from the theory of science to fieldwork], Oslo, Fagbokforlaget (2002).Google Scholar

³⁰ These findings are consistent with the findings in Afrobarometer, ‘Ugandans Divided on Political Transistion’, Afrobarometer Briefing Paper 15, July 2005, available at http://www.afrobarometer.org/papers/AfrobriefNo15.pdf.Google Scholar

³¹ They did not label themselves non-partisan, but are categorized as such because they did not identify themselves with any party.Google Scholar

³² Ottemoeller, Dan, ‘Popular Perceptions of Democracy, Elections and Attitudes in Uganda’, Comparative Political Studies, 31: 1 (1998), pp. 98–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³³ The LC II is an administrative unit and does not convene courts for dispute resolutions.Google Scholar