Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:36:37.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Popular Parties: Brazil and Argentina in a Latin American Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Torcuato S. Di Tella
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

THE INSTABILITY OF MOST LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES derives to a large extent from the difficulty of incorporating the working class and other popular strata into the political system. Euro ean countries also had to face a similar challenge decades ago, gut the central position they had in the international economic system helped to ease the tensions. In the Third world or Latin America the problem is compounded because to the working class must be added large sectors of urban marginals, peasants and often the impoverished middle classes. These groups tend to form broadly-based parties which become the main contenders for power against the dominant establishment. They are placed in a somewhat similar position to that occupied by Labour, Social Democratic or Eurocommunist parties in Europe or Japan. But they are based on different organizational and ideological elements, and their popular rather than workingclass nature often involves strange coalitions. Brazil and Argentina share fully these traits. In order to understand the characteristics of the popular political parties in those two countries one must examine them in a Latin American comparative perspective.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , 01 April 1984 , pp. 250 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chilean trade unions have always had a very weak bureaucratic structure since president Alessandri’s law of 1924, forbidding payments to union officials and forcing the formation of autonomous ‘industrial’ unions in factories employing over 50 workers. See Angell, Alan, Politics and the Labour Movement in Chile, London, Oxford University Press, 1972 Google Scholar; Johnson, Dale (ed.), The Chilean Road to Socialism, Garden City, NY, Anchor Press, 1979 Google Scholar; Petras, James, Politics and Social Forces in Chilean Development, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1969 Google Scholar; Valenzuela, Arturo, The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Books, 1976 Google Scholar; and Garcés, Joan, El Estado y los problemas tácticos en el gobierno de Allende, Madrid, Siglo Veintiuno de Espana, 1974 Google Scholar.

2 Velasco, Jaime Castillo, Los caminos de la revolución, Santiago de Chile, Editorial del Pacifico, 1972 Google Scholar; Williams, Edward J., Latin American Christian Democratic Parties, Knoxville, Tenn., University of Tennessee Press, 1967 Google Scholar; Snow, Peter, El radicalismo chileno, Buenos Aires, F. de Aguirre, 1972 Google Scholar; Rock, David, Politics in Argentina, 1890–1930: The Rise and Fall of Radicalism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bourricaud, François, Power and Society in Contemporary Peru, New York, Praeger, 1970 Google Scholar; and Martz, John D. and Meyers, David (eds), Venezuela: The Democratic Experience, New York, Praeger 1977 Google Scholar.

3 Necochea, Hernán Ramírez, Historia del movimiento obrero en Chile: el siglo XIX, Santiago de Chile, Austral, 1956 Google Scholar; Recabarren, Luis Emilio, Obras escogidas, Santiago de Chile, Editorial Recabarren, 1965 Google Scholar; Jobet, Julio Cesar, Luis Emilio Recabarren: los orígenes del movimiento obrero y el socialismo chilenos, Santiago de Chile, Prensa Latinoamericana, 1955 Google Scholar; Lafertte, Elias, Vida de un comunista, Santiago de Chile, 1961 Google Scholar; and Drake, Paul, Socialism and Populism in Chile, 1932–52, Urbana, Ill., University of Illinois Press, 1978 Google Scholar.

4 Nunn, Frederick, Chilean Politics, 1920‐31, Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press, 1976 Google Scholar; Montero, René, La verdad sobre Ibáñez, Buenos Aires, Editorial Freeland, 1953 Google Scholar; and Rojas, Ernesto Wurth, Ibáñez, caudillo enigmático, Santiago de Chile, Editorial del Pacífico, 1958 Google Scholar.

5 Justo, Juan B., La realización del socialismo, Buenos Aires, Editorial Vanguardia, 1947 Google Scholar; and Walter, Richard, The Socialist Party of Argentina: 1890–1930, Austin, Texas, Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas at Austin, 1977 Google Scholar.

6 For a review of discussions on this subject, see my ‘Working Class Politics and Organization in Argentina’, Latin American Research Review, Summer 1981.

7 Germani, Gino, Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Books, 1978 Google Scholar.

8 Skidmore, Thomas, Politics in Brazil, 1930‐64, New York, Oxford University Press, 1967 Google Scholar; Schneider, Ronald, The Political System of Brazil, 1964–70, New York, Columbia University Press, 1971 Google Scholar; Stepan, Alfred, The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1971 Google Scholar; Dulles, J. W. F., Vargas of Brazil, Austin, University of Texas Press, 1967 Google Scholar; Jaguaribe, Helio, ‘Las elecciones de 1962 en el Brasil’, Desarrollo Económico, Vol. 13, No. 4, January‐March 1964 Google Scholar; and Os partidos e as eleiçes no Brasil, Carlos Estevam Martins (et al.), Introduction by Fernando H. Cardoso and Bolivar Lamounier (eds), Rio de Janeiro, Paz e Terra, 1975.

9 Angelina Figueiredo, ‘Intervençes sindicais e o novo sindicalismo’, Dados, No. 17, 1978; Moises, José A., ‘La huelga de los trescientos mil y las comisiones de empresa’, Revista Mexicana de Sociología, Vol. 40, No. 2, April‐June 1978 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Klaren, Peter, Modernization, Dislocation and Aprismo, Austin, Texas, University of Texas Press, 1973 Google Scholar; Payne, James, Labor and Politics in Peru, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1965 Google Scholar; Hilliker, Grant, The Politics of Reform in Peru: The Aprista and Other Mass Parties of Latin America, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press, 1971 Google Scholar.

11 Kantor, Harry, The Ideology and Program of the Peruvian Aprista Movement, New York, Octagon Books, 1966 Google Scholar, and Torre, V. Haya de la, Treinta años de aprismo, Mexico, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1956 Google Scholar.

12 Martz, John, Acción Democrática, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1966 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Powell, John, Political Mobilization of the Venezuelan Peasant, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Taylor, Philip, The Venezuelan ‘golpe’ of 1958, Washington, DC, Institute for the Comparative Study of Political Systems, 1968 Google Scholar.

13 Malloy, James, Bolivia, the Uncompleted Revolution, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1970 Google Scholar; Klein, Herbert, Parties and Political Change in Bolivia, 1880–1952, London, Cambridge University Press, 1969 Google Scholar; Lora, Guillermo, A History of the Bolivian Labour Movement, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977 Google Scholar; Juan Combo, Bolivia bajo el modelo de Banzer, Centro de Investigación y Educación Popular, Bogotá, 1977 and Mitchell, Christopher, The Legacy of Populism in Bolivia, New York, Praeger, 1977 Google Scholar.

14 Cumberland, Charles, The Mexican Revolution: Genesis Under Madero, Austin, Texas, University of Texas Press, 1952 Google Scholar; Calvert, Peter, The Mexican Revolution, 1910–14, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1968 Google Scholar; Herzog, Jesus Silva, Breve historía de la revolución Mexicana, Mexico, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1960, 2 volsGoogle Scholar; Womack, John, Zapata and the Mexican Revolution, New York, Knopf, 1969 Google Scholar; asurto, Jorge, El proletariado industrial en México, 1850–1930, México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1975 Google Scholar, and Navarro, Moisés González, Las huelgas textiles en el porfiriato, Puebla, México, Editorial J. M. Cejica Jr., 1970 Google Scholar. For an analysis of more recent trends in Mexican politics, Casanova, Pablo González, Democracy in Mexico, New York, Oxford University Press, 1970 Google Scholar and Reyna, José L. and Weinart, Richard (eds), Authoritarianism in Mexico, Philadelphia, Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 1977 Google Scholar.

15 For the pre‐revolutionary political situation, see McGaffey, Wyatt and Barnett, Clifford, Cuba: Its People, Its Culture, New Haven, HRAF Press, 1962 Google Scholar; Nelson, Lowry, Rural Cuba, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1950 Google Scholar, and Aguilar, Luis, Cuba 1933: Prologue to Revolution, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1972 Google Scholar.

16 For various interpretations of the post‐revolutionary political structure, see Fagen, Richard, The Transformation of Political Culture in Cuba, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1969 Google Scholar; Karol, K. S., Guerrillas in Power, New York, Hill & Wang, 1970 Google Scholar; and Horowitz, Irving (ed.), Cuban Communism, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Books, 1977 Google Scholar.

17 See Gott, Richard, Guerrilla Movements in Latin America, London, Nelson, 1970 Google Scholar.

18 See Zeitlin, Maurice, Revolutionary Politics and the Cuban Working Class, New York, Harper & Row, 1970 Google Scholar; Thomas, Hugh, Cuba: The Pursuit of Freedom, New York, Harper & Row, 1971 Google Scholar; and Dominguez, Jorge, Cuba, Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1978 Google ScholarPubMed.

19 The growth of cotton and cattle production in Nicaragua, replacing the previous importance of coffee, was apparently responsible for the displacement and proletarianization of many peasants associated with earlier forms of land management. Crawley, Eduardo, Dictators Never Die: A Portrait of Nicaragua and the Somoza Dynasty, New York, St Martin’s Press, 1979 Google Scholar and Diederich, Bernard, Somoza and the Legacy of U. S. Involvement in Central America, London, Junction Press, 1983 Google Scholar.

20 See Araujo, Manuel Mora y and Llorente, Ignacio, El voto peronista, Buenos Aires, Editorial Sudamericana, 1980 Google Scholar. The large vote Peronismo go in the less developed parts of the country was of course numerically mostly rural and peasant, but the support from insecure or downwardly mobile sectors of the middle classes of those areas was strategic. They acted as an intermediary to mobilize popular support via local caudillista structures of a more traditional type than the ones that could function in the more industrialized areas.

21 Peronismo never had the support of a majority of members of those upper status groups, but enough of it, as far as I can see, to create a special component in the coalition of interests that led it to power and maintained it there. I would hypothesize that the social support for the ‘entorno’, that is, the group of subordinates, friends, business associates and ‘hombres de confianza’ around Perón (or his wife later on) comes from those upper status groups. They are a minority within their class, at odds with the dominant sentiments of their peers, and without much legitimate organization of their own. The entorno can be considered, therefore, as a functional alternative to the organization and legitimated representation which they lack in Argentine political life.