Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:23:53.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Opposition Questions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Geraint Parry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘ONE OF THE PECULIARITIES OF THE SUBJECT OF OPPOSITION IS THAT, although the problem of opposition is one of the oldest, very few works have ever dealt with it specifically and exclusively.’ These introductory remarks to their 1968 volume by Ghiţa Ionescu and Isabel de Madariaga still hold remarkably true, despite a number of subsequent works and collections devoted to the subject. Their explanation was that although opposition is the altera pars of government it is a concept which is necessarily relative to that of power upon which political action centres and around which political science moulds itself.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , October 1997 , pp. 457 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ionescu, G. and de Madariaga, I., Opposition, London, Watts, 1968, p. 2.Google Scholar

2 Dahl, R. A. (ed.), Political Oppositions in Western Democracies, New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar This was followed by > Dahl, R. A. (ed.), Regimes and Oppositions, New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

3 Potter, Allen, ‘Great Britain: Opposition with a Capital “O”’, in Dahl (ed.), Political Oppositions, op. cit., pp. 3–33.Google Scholar

4 See Foord, A.S., His Majesty’s Opposition 1714–1830, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1964, p. 1.Google Scholar

5 Classically on such rhetoric see Skinner, , ‘The Principles and Practice of Opposition: The Case of Bolingbroke versus Walpole’, in McKendrick, N. Quentin, (ed.), Historical Perspectives: Studies in English Thought and Society in Honour of J H. Plumb, London, Europa Publications, 1974, pp. 93–128.Google Scholar

6 Dahl, ‘Preface’, Political Oppositions, op. cit., p. xiv.Google Scholar

7 Amongst a growing literature see Fishkin, J., Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform, New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 1991;Google Scholar Burnheim, J., Is Democracy Possible?, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1994;Google Scholar and Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D., Democracy and Disagreement, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

8 The essays in this collection were first presented at a Conference on the Repositioning of Opposition sponsored by Government and Opposition and held at the University of Reading. In addition to the contributors the following delegates attended: Sir Nicholas Bayne, Professor Richard Bellamy (University of Reading), Professor Michael Biddiss (University of Reading), Professor Christoph Bluth (University of Reading), Dr Ken Dark (University of Reading), Miss Sarah Evans (University of Reading), Mr Ken Gladdish (University of Reading), Professor Roy Gregory (University of Reading), Professor Charles Hauss (University of Reading), Dr Jude Howell (University of East Anglia), Dr Barry Jones (University of Reading), Mrs Rosalind Jones (Government and Opposition), Dr Sunil Khilnani (Birkbeck College, University of London), Dr Andy Knapp (University of Reading), Professor Isabel de Madariaga (University of London), Professor Elizabeth Meehan (Queen’s University, Belfast), Dr Patrizia Messina (University of Padua), Professor Kenneth Minogue (London School of Economics), Professor Gordon Smith (London School of Economics), Professor Sir Trevor Smith (Vice‐Chancellor, University of Ulster), Professor Alan Ware (Worcester College, Oxford), Professor Roger Williams (Vice‐Chancellor, University of Reading) and Dr Stewart Wood (Madgalen College, Oxford).

The Editor wishes to thank the Vice‐Chancellor of the University of Reading, Professor Michael Biddiss and the staff of Black Horse House for their help with the conference arrangements.