Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:20:57.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nkrumahism: past and future of an ideology1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Extract

On the morning of 12 February 1951 Kwame Nkrumah was freed from James Fort Prison in Accra. On the 14th he was invited by the Governor of the Gold Coast to form a government. He and his party, the Convention People's Party (CPP), remained in office through the transition to political independence on 6 March 1957, when the Gold Coast changed its name to Ghana, until the military revolution of 24 February 1966. This event formed the fifth of a series of army coups in Negro Africa which had begun on 25 November 1965 in the Congo, and it is probably the most important. Not only had Nkrumah held power for fifteen years, he was, for all the small size of his country, almost certainly the most influential politician south of the Sahara, and for what it was worth the only serious non-Muslim ideologist of the whole continent. Ghana had led the movement to African independence. So far as there was a common political creed its items and aspirations were Nkrumah's and the aspirations, however ineffective, to African unity, were based on his Pan-Africanism and not on the potentially alternative concept of négritude which had spread from the West Indies into French Africa's attitudes and politics.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 MacRae, Donald G., Ideology and Society, London, 1961 Google Scholar

3 Though of course, if it survives, it may do so under other names and attributions.

4 It is instructive that in all writings on neo‐colonialism more importance, more evil, is attributed to America, W. Germany, and even Switzerland and Israel than to the major ex‐colonial powers.

5 Of course there are exceptions ‐ for example the British and French Cameroons.

6 Cf. MacRae, D. G., ‘Foundations for the Sociology of Politics’, Political Quarterly, 07, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar