Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:37:16.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Increasingly ‘Irrational’ Party Systems: Evidence that There Are Increasingly More Than Two Parties at the District Level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2013

Christopher D. Raymond
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent work has noted an increase in the number of parties at the national level in both proportional and majoritarian electoral systems. While the conventional wisdom maintains that the incentives provided by the electoral system will prevent the number of parties at the district level from exceeding two in majoritarian systems, the evidence presented here demonstrates otherwise. I argue that this has occurred because the number of cleavages articulated by parties has increased as several third parties have begun articulating cleavages that are not well represented by the two larger parties.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 506 - 525
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Christopher D. Raymond is a Visiting Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of New Orleans. Contact email: [email protected].

References

Bartolini, S.Mair, P. (1990), Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885–1985 (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Best, R.E. (2010), ‘Increasing Irrationality? The Equilibrium Relationship between Electoral and Legislative Party System Size, 1950–2005’, Electoral Studies, 29(1): 105–116.Google Scholar
van Biezen, I.Kopecký, P. (2007), ‘The State and the Parties: Public Funding, Public Regulation, and Rent-Seeking in Contemporary Democracies’, Party Politics, 13(2): 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A.Turgeon, M. (2004), ‘How Good are Voters at Sorting out the Weakest Candidate in their Constituency?’, Electoral Studies, 23(3): 455–461.Google Scholar
Caramani, D. (2000), Elections in Western Europe since 1815: Electoral Results by Constituencies (New York: Palgrave).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramani, D. (2003), ‘The End of Silent Elections: The Birth of Electoral Competition, 1832–1915’, Party Politics, 9(4): 411–433.Google Scholar
Caramani, D. (2004), The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Caramani, D. (2005), ‘The Formation of National Party Systems in Europe: A Comparative Historical Analysis’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(4): 295–322.Google Scholar
Chhibber, P.K.Kolman, K. (1998), ‘Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States’, American Political Science Review, 92(2): 329–342.Google Scholar
Chhibber, P.K.Kolman, K. (2004), The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Chhibber, P.K.Murali, G. (2006), ‘Duvergerian Dynamics in the Indian States: Federalism and the Number of Parties in the State Assembly Elections’, Party Politics, 12(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Clark, W.R.Golder, M. (2006), ‘Rehabilitating Duverger's Theory: Testing the Mechanical and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws’, Comparative Political Studies, 39(6): 679–708.Google Scholar
Clarke, H.D., LeDuc, L., Jensen, J.Pammet, J.H. (1979), Political Choice in Canada (New York: McGraw-Hill Ryerson).Google Scholar
Cox, G.W. (1997), Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Cox, G.W. (1999), ‘Electoral Rules and Electoral Coordination’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 145–161.Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J. (1984), ‘Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Journal of Politics, 46(1): 264–284.Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J.Wattenberg, M.P. (2000) (eds), Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J., Flanagan, S.Beck, P. (1984) (eds), Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Diwakar, R. (2007), ‘Duverger's Law and the Size of the Indian Party System’, Party Politics, 13(5): 539–561.Google Scholar
Duverger, M. (1954), Political Parties (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
Engelmann, F.C.Schwartz, M.A. (1967), Political Parties and the Canadian Social Structure (Scarborough, ON: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
Enyedi, Z. (2005), ‘The Role of Agency in Cleavage Formation’, European Journal of Political Research, 44(5): 697–720.Google Scholar
Enyedi, Z. (2008), ‘The Social and Attitudinal Bases of Political Parties: Cleavage Politics Revisited’, European Review, 16(3): 287–304.Google Scholar
Evans, G., Heath, A.Lalljee, M. (1996), ‘Measuring Left–Right and Libertarian–Authoritarian Values in the British Electorate’, British Journal of Sociology, 47(1): 93–112.Google Scholar
Gaines, B.J. (1999), ‘Duverger's Law and the Meaning of Canadian Exceptionalism’, Comparative Political Studies, 32(7): 835–861.Google Scholar
Gaines, B.J. (2009), ‘Does the United Kingdom Obey Duverger's Law?’, in B. Grofman, A. Blais and S. Bowler (eds), Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting: The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States (New York: Springer): 115–134.Google Scholar
Gallagher, M. (1991), ‘Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems’, Electoral Studies, 10(1): 33–51.Google Scholar
Gidengil, E., Blais, A., Everitt, J., Fournier, P.Nevitte, N. (2006), ‘Back to the Future? Making Sense of the 2004 Election outside Quebec’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 39(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Heath, A., Jowell, R.Curtice, J. (1985), How Britain Votes (New York: Pergamon Press).Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1977), The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1990), Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
James, C.C. (1980), ‘Social Credit and the Values Party’, in H.R. Penniman (ed.), New Zealand at the Polls: The General Election of 1978 (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research): 148–167.Google Scholar
Johnston, R.Cutler, F. (2009), ‘Canada: The Puzzle of Local Three-Party Competition’, in B. Grofman, A. Blais and S. Bowler (eds), Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting: The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States (New York: Springer): 83–96.Google Scholar
Katz, R.S.Mair, P. (1995), ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics, 1(1): 5–28.Google Scholar
Laakso, M.Taagepera, R. (1979), ‘“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 12(1): 3–27.Google Scholar
Lanoue, D.J.Bowler, S. (1992), ‘The Sources of Tactical Voting in British Parliamentary Elections, 1983–1987’, Political Behavior, 14(2): 141–157.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M.Rokkan, S. (1967) (eds), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
McKelvey, R.D.Ordeshook, P. (1972), ‘A General Theory of the Calculus of Voting’, in J.F. Herndon and J.L. Bernd (eds), Mathematical Applications in Political Science. Vol. 6 (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia): 32–78.Google Scholar
Matthew, H.C.G., McKibbin, R.I.Kay, J.A. (1976), ‘The Franchise Factor in the Rise of the Labour Party’, English Historical Review, 91(361): 723–752.Google Scholar
Meffert, M.F., Huber, S., Gschwend, T.Pappi, F.U. (2011), ‘More than Wishful Thinking: Causes and Consequences of Voters’ Electoral Expectations about Parties and Coalitions’, Electoral Studies, 30(4): 804–815.Google Scholar
Merolla, J.L.Stephenson, L.B. (2007), ‘Strategic Voting in Canada: A Cross Time Analysis’, Electoral Studies, 26(2): 235–246.Google Scholar
Miller, R. (2005), Party Politics in New Zealand (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Morton, W.L. (1950), The Progressive Party in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
Niemi, R.G., Whitten, G.Franklin, M.N. (1992), ‘Constituency Characteristics, Individual Characteristics, and Tactical Voting in the 1987 British General Election’, British Journal of Political Science, 23(2): 131–137.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, P.C.Shvetsova, O.V. (1994), ‘Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, 38(1): 100–123.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A.Sprague, J. (1986), Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Rae, D.W. (1971), The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. (1970), Citizens, Elections, and Parties (New York: Universitetsforlaget-McKay).Google Scholar
Rose, R.McAllister, I. (1990), The Loyalties of Voters: A Lifetime Learning Model (London: Sage).Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1969), ‘From the Sociology of Politics to Political Sociology’, in S.M. Lipset (ed.), Politics and the Social Sciences (New York: Oxford University Press): 65–100.Google Scholar
Sharp, P.F. (1948), The Agrarian Revolt in Western Canada (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
Singer, M.M.Stephenson, L.B. (2009), ‘The Political Context and Duverger's Theory: Evidence at the District Level’, Electoral Studies, 28(3): 480–491.Google Scholar
Taagepera, R. (2007), Predicting Party Sizes: The Logic of Simple Electoral Systems (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Taagepera, R.Shugart, M.S. (1989), Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Torcal, M.Mainwaring, S. (2003), ‘The Political Recrafting of Social Bases of Party Competition: Chile, 1973–95’, British Journal of Political Science, 33(1): 55–84.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. (1966), The Downfall of the Liberal Party, 1914–1935 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar