Article contents
Business Interests and the British Conservative Party
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
Extract
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BUSINESS INTERESTS AND THE British Conservative Party is a matter of crucial importance which is relatively neglected in the existing literature. The basic theme of this article is that this relationship is more problematic and tenuous than is often assumed to be the case. Relations between business interests and the Conservative Government elected in 1979 are likely to be characterized by recurrent tensions on questions of economic and industrial policy.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1980
References
1 Gamble, A., The Conservative Nation, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974, p. 320.Google Scholar
2 Watkinson, Viscount, Blueprint for Survival, London, Allen & Unwin, 1976, p. 85.Google Scholar
3 Therborn, G., What Does The Ruling Class Do When It Rules?, London, New Left Books, 1978, p. 191.Google Scholar
4 Ibid., p. 193.
5 Gamble, A. and Walton, P., Capitalism in Crisis, London, Macmillan, 1976, p. 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Rogaly, J., ‘Who Needs the Tory Party?’, Financial Times, 29 11 1977 .Google Scholar
7 Report in the ‘Lombard’ column, Financial Times, 13 March 1978.
8 Hurd, D., An End to Promises, London, Collins, 1979, pp. 98–9.Google Scholar
9 Gamble, op. cit., p. 44.
10 I am grateful to the SSRC Industrial Relations Research Unit at the University of Warwick for allowing me to quote these figures which are taken from a sample survey conducted on its behalf by Industrial Facts and Forecasting in 1977–78. Survey N = 970.
11 Westergaard, J. and Resler, H., Class in a Capitalist Society, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1976, p. 238.Google Scholar
12 Gilmour, I., Inside Right, London, Hutchinson, 1977, p. 132.Google Scholar
13 Burch, M., Styles of Leadership in Opposition: Edward Heath and Margaret Thatcher, paper presented at the SSRC conference on the Conservative Party, Oxford 1978, p. 23.Google Scholar
14 Gilmour, op. cit., p. 132.
15 For relevant evidence on this point, see Jessop, R., Traditionalism, Conservatism and British Political Culture, London: Allen & Unwin, 1974, p. 95.Google Scholar
16 Gamble, op. cit., p. 208.
17 Pinto‐Duschinsky, M., ‘Stratification and Power in the British Conservative Party’, American Behavioural Scientist, Vol. 17, 1973, pp. 285–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 The Observer, 25 February 1979.
19 Financial Times, 25 July 1979.
20 Gamble and Walton, op. cit., p. 194.
21 Gamble, op. cit., p. 133.
22 94th Conservative Conference, Verbatim Report, p. 33.
23 Rose, R., The Problem of Party Government, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1976, p. 238.Google Scholar
24 Mellors, C., The British M. P., Farnborough, Saxon House, 1978, p. 61.Google Scholar
25 Ramsden, J., ‘The Changing Base of British Conservatism’ in Cook, C. and Ramsden, J. (eds), New Trends in British Politics Since 1945, pp. 28–46, p. 43.Google Scholar
26 Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Industrial and Commercial Representation (Devlin Report), London, Association of British Chambers of Commerce and Confederation of British Industry, 1972, p. 83.
27 Ramsden, , op. cit., p. 43.Google Scholar
28 Vogel, D., ‘Why Businessmen Distrust Their State: The Political Consciousness of American Corporate Executives’, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 8, 1978, pp. 45–78, p. 69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29 Quoted in Gilmour, op. cit., p. 236.Google Scholar
30 Walker, P., The Ascent of Britain, London, Sidgwick and Jackson, 1977, p. 24.Google Scholar
31 Gilmour, op. cit., p. 233 and p. 232.Google Scholar
32 The Right Approach to the Economy, London, Conservative Central Office, 1976, p. 39.Google Scholar
33 The Observer, 25 February 1979.
34 Speech at Amersham quoted in Russel, T., The Tory Party: Its Policies, Divisions and Future, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1978, p. 164.Google Scholar
35 Vogel, , op. cit., p. 78.Google Scholar
36 Ramsden, , op. cit., p. 34.Google Scholar
- 8
- Cited by