Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:52:45.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Practice Theory and International Relations: A reply to our critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2020

SILVIYA LECHNER*
Affiliation:
Department of War Studies, King’s College, Strand, London WC2R 2LS
MERVYN FROST*
Affiliation:
Department of War Studies, King’s College, Strand, London WC2R 2LS

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Authors 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds). (2011a). International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent. (2011b). ‘‘International Practices: Introduction and Framework.’’ In International Practices, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, 135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent. (2011c). ‘‘International Practices.’’ International Theory 3(1):136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. (2000). ‘‘Rawls’s Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World.’’ Ethics 110(4):697721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueger, Christian. (2013). ‘‘Communities of Security Practice at Work? The Emerging African Maritime Security Regime.’’ African Security 6(3-4):297316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. (1995) [1975]. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, translated by Sheridan, Alan. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. (2003) [1997]. Lecture from 17 March 1976. In Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976, translated by Macey, David, edited by Bertani, Mauro and Fontana, Alessandro, 239–63. New York, NY: Picador.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. (1998). The Orders of Discourse: Philosophy, Social Science, and Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. (2004). ‘‘Desperately Seeking Wittgenstein.’’ European Journal of Political Theory 3(1):7798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, John G. (2009). ‘‘Can Social Science Be Just?’’ Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39(4):595621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, John G. (2013). ‘‘Leaving Everything as It Is: Political Inquiry after Wittgenstein.’’ Contemporary Political Theory 12(2):80101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. (1967) [1821]. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, translated by Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted. (2018). ‘‘Change in International Practices.’’ European Journal of International Relations 24(3):687711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) [1797]. The Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (1996). Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. (1975). On Human Conduct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. (2010). International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO–Russia Diplomacy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. (1955). ‘‘Two Concepts of Rules.’’ The Philosophical Review 64(1):332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. (1996). Political Liberalism (p/b). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schindler, Sebastian and Wille, Tobias. (2015). ‘‘Change in and through Practice: Pierre Bourdieu, Vincent Pouliot, and the End of the Cold War.’’ International Theory 7(2):330–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje. (2008). The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Peter. (1958). The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. (1987). ‘‘Facts and Superfacts.’’ In Trying to Make Sense, by Winch, Peter, 5463. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1961) [1921]. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, translated by Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F.. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1968) [1953]. Philosophical Investigations (3rd edn), translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar