Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:46:44.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Order at the margins: The legal construction of interface conflicts over time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2020

NICO KRISCH Open the ORCID record for NICO KRISCH [Opens in a new window] ,
FRANCESCO CORRADINI  and
LUCY LU REIMERS
NICO KRISCH*
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, 2 Chemin Eugène-Rigot, Geneva, Switzerland, 1672
FRANCESCO CORRADINI*
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, 2 Chemin Eugène-Rigot, Geneva, Switzerland, 1672
LUCY LU REIMERS*
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, 2 Chemin Eugène-Rigot, Geneva, Switzerland, 1672
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Legal multiplicity in the global realm, and the interface conflicts that ensue from it, are widely thought to have a destabilising effect, blocking the path towards a more integrated and perhaps constitutionalised global order. While this diagnosis may appear plausible if interface conflicts are seen as snapshots and rivalrous institutions as the main actors, it is less convincing if we regard these conflicts as part of social processes of contestation that define the relations between different norms over time. It is also less plausible if actors with other orientations – norm irritation or navigation – are taken into view. This article works towards a more encompassing account, both temporally and as regards actor orientations. It uses two case studies of conflicts at the interface between economic governance and human rights to probe the plausibility of its conjectures. Both cases appear as instances of prolonged norm contestation which, despite continued irresolution of the underlying conflicts as a matter of law, have resulted in a significant reorientation and (partial) consolidation around new interpretations. This suggests that interface conflicts, rather than destabilising the rule of law, may also open a pathway for change in the otherwise rigid structure of the international legal order

Keywords

interface conflictsinternational lawnorm contestationpluralismregime complexity
Type
Special Issue: After Fragmentation
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , pp. 343 - 363
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Frederick M. 2005. “The WTO Medicines Decision: World Pharmaceutical Trade and the Protection of Public Health.” American Journal of International Law 99(2):317–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., Green, Jessica F. and Keohane, Robert O.. 2016. “Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance.” International Organization 70(2):247–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. “The Politics of International Regime Complexity.” Perspectives on Politics 7(1):13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. and Raustiala, Kal. 2018. “The Rise of International Regime Complexity.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14(1):329–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik. 2015. A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence in International Law . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backer, Larry Catá. 2016. “Governance Polycentrism or Regulated Self-Regulation – Rule Systems for Human Rights Impacts of Economic Activity Where National, Private and International Regimes Collide.” In Contested Regime Collisions: Norm Fragmentation in World Society, edited by Kerstin, Blome, Andreas, Fischer-Lescano, Hannah, Franzki, Nora, Markard and Stefan, Oeter, 198–225. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernaz, Nadia. 2016. Business and Human Rights: History, Law and Policy – Bridging the Accountability Gap. Routledge.10.4324/9781315626055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkenkötter, Hannah. (forthcoming). “International Law as a Common Language across Spheres of Authority?” Global Constitutionalism.Google Scholar
Bradlow, Daniel D. 1993. “International Organizations and Private Complaints: The Case of the World Bank Inspection Panel.” Virginia Journal of International Law 34:553–613.Google Scholar
Cohen, Harlan Grant. 2018. “Fragmentation.” In Concepts for International Law, edited by Jean, d’Aspremont and Sahib, Singh, 315–27. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Dañino, Roberto. 2006. “Legal Opinion on Human Rights and the Work of the World Bank.” Available at <https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-oxio/e215.013.1/law-oxio-e215>.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole and Zimmermann, Lisbeth. 2018. “Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Robustness of International Norms.” International Studies Review:1–26.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, Mireille. 2009. Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
De Schutter, Olivier. 2016. “Towards a New Treaty on Business and Human Rights.” Business and Human Rights Journal 1(1):41–67.10.1017/bhj.2015.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2013. “The Tragedy of the Global Institutional Commons.” In Back to Basics: State Power in a Contemporary World, edited by Martha, Finnemore and Judith, Goldstein, 280–310. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwood, Lauren E. 2011. “Resisting Dispossession: Indigenous Peoples, the World Bank and the Contested Terrain of Policy.” New Global Studies 5(1):1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faude, Benjamin. 2015. Von Konkurrenz zu Arbeitsteilung: Komplexität und Dynamik im Zusammenspiel internationaler Institutionen . Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan and Brown, David L.. 1998. The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and Grassroots Movements . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Geis, Anna and Wiuff Moe, Louise (forthcoming). “Normative Turbulences in the Interstices of African and Global Security Governance.” Global Constitutionalism.Google Scholar
Genugten, Willem Van. 2015. The World Bank Group, the IMF and Human Rights: A Contextualised Way Forward. Cambridge: Intersentia.10.1017/9781780685649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gholiagha, Sassan, Anna, Holzscheiter and Liese, Andrea (forthcoming). “Activating Norm Collisions: Interface Conflicts in International Drug Control.” Global Constitutionalism.Google Scholar
Gómez-Mera, Laura. 2016. “Regime Complexity and Global Governance: The Case of Trafficking in Persons.” European Journal of International Relations 22(3):566–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Jessica F. and Graeme, Auld. 2017. “Unbundling the Regime Complex: The Effects of Private Authority.” Transnational Environmental Law 6(2):259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewe, Wilhelm G. 2000. The Epochs of International Law. Berlin and New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2004. “Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking.” Yale Journal of International Law 29:1–83.Google Scholar
Heupel, Monika. 2017. “Human Rights Protection in World Bank Lending: Following the Lead of the US Congress.” In Protecting the Individual from International Authority, edited by Monica, Heupel and Michael, Zürn, 241–72. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Law Commission. 2006. “Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. Finalized by Martti Koskenniemi.” A/CN.4/L.682.Google Scholar
Kern, Holger Lutz. 2004. “Strategies of Legal Change: Great Britain, International Law, and the Abolition of the Transatlantic Slave Trade.” Journal of the History of International Law 6:233–58.10.1163/1571805042782073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict. 1999. “Operational Policies of International Institutions as Part of the Law-Making Process: The World Bank and Indigenous Peoples.” In The Reality of International Law: Essays in Honour of Ian Brownlie, edited by Guy S, Goodwin-Gill and Stefan, Talmon, 323–42. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict. 2011. “International Courts: Uneven Judicialization in Global Order.” In Cambridge Companion to International Law, edited by James, Crawford and Martti, Koskenniemi, 203–27. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian and Zürn, Michael. (Introduction to this Special Issue). “After Fragmentation: Norm Collisions, Interface Conflicts, and Conflict Management.” Global Constitutionalism.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico. 2010. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law . Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Andrew. 2015. “Twenty Years of the WTO Appellate Body’s ‘Fragmentation Jurisprudence’.” Journal of International Trade Law and Policy 14(3):116–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroy, Anne-Marie. 2012. “Letter to Olivier De Schutter and Cephas Lumina.” (10 September 2012) available at <https://spdb.ohchr.org/hrdb/22nd/THE_WORLD_BANK_09.10.12_(2.2012).pdf>.Google Scholar
Megiddo, Tamar. 2019. “Beyond Fragmentation: On International Law’s Integrationist Forces.” Yale Journal of International Law 44:115–48.Google Scholar
Morse, Bradford and Berger, Thomas R.. 1992. “Sardar Sarovar: Report of the Independent Review.” International Environmental Law Research Centre. Available at <http://ielrc.org/Content/c9202.pdf>.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia C. and Keohane, Robert O.. 2014. “Contested Multilateralism.” The Review of International Organizations 9(4):385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. 2018. Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674984806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2009. “Final Statement by the National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises – Complaint from Survival International against Vedanta Resources Plc.” Available at <http://www.oecd.org/investment/mne/43884129.pdf>..>Google Scholar
OHCHR. 2014. “Letter from Special Mandate Holders to the World Bank President.” (12 December 2014) available at <https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/EPoverty/WorldBank.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Orsini, Amandine, Morin, Jean-Frédéric and Young, Oran. 2013. “Regime Complexes: A Buzz, a Boom, or a Boost for Global Governance?” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 19(1):27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacio, Ana. 2006. “The Way Forward: Human Rights and the World Bank.” Development Outreach (October) 35–7.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost. 2003. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511494550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Anne. 2017. “The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 15(3):671–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. and Shaffer, Gregory C.. 2009. When Cooperation Fails: The International Law and Politics of Genetically Modified Foods . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulkowski, Dirk. 2014. The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict . Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramasastry, Anita. 2015. “Corporate Social Responsibility Versus Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Gap Between Responsibility and Accountability.” Journal of Human Rights 14(2):237–59.10.1080/14754835.2015.1037953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David G.. 2004. “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources.” International Organization 58(1):277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 2007. “Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda.” The American Journal of International Law 101(4):819–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safrin, Sabrina. 2002. “Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreements.” American Journal of International Law 96(3):606–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne and Kendall Stiles, W.. 2009. International Norms and Cycles of Change. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saper, Benjamin M. 2012. “The International Finance Corporation’s Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman (CAO): An Examination of Accountability and Effectiveness from a Global Administrative Law Perspective.” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 44:1279–1329.Google Scholar
Sarfaty, Galit. 2012. Values in Translation: Human Rights and the Culture of the World Bank. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sauvant, Karl P. 2015. “The Negotiations of the United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations: Experience and Lessons Learned.” The Journal of World Investment & Trade 16(1):11–87.10.1163/22119000-01601002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2012. “A Cosmopolitan Legal Order: Constitutional Pluralism and Rights Adjudication in Europe.” Global Constitutionalism 1(1):53–90.10.1017/S2045381711000062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, Antonios. 2012. “Judicial Dialogue in Multi-Level Governance: The Impact of the Solange Argument.” In The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law, edited by Ole Kristian, Fauchald and André, Nollkaemper, 185–215. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Vita, Viorica, Tan, Rachel and Panjshiri, Nealofar. 2017. “The World Bank Inspection Panel and International Human Rights Law.” NYU Law School Clinic on International Organizations. Available at <https://www.iilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/The-World-Bank-Inspection-Panel-FINAL-REPORT.pdf>.Google Scholar
Weissbrodt, David and Kruger, Muria. 2003. “Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights.” American Journal of International Law 97(4):901–22.10.2307/3133689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettstein, Florian. 2015. “Normativity, Ethics, and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: A Critical Assessment.” Journal of Human Rights 14(2):162–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje. 2018. Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisken, Lea. 2018. Institutional Overlap and Norm Collisions . Doctoral Thesis. FU Berlin.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2018. “High-Level Summary of Comments Received on the Draft ESF Guidance Notes.” Available at <http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/943801530214217223/ESF-Borrower-Guidance-Notes-summary-comment-and-response-matrix-June-2018.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Wyss, Hans. 1993. “Lessons Learned from Narmada.” Available at <http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/221941467991015938/pdf/96034-BR-PUBLIC-Box391432B-Narmada-Sardar-PUBLIC.pdf>.Google Scholar
Young, Margaret A. 2012. “Regime Interaction in Creating, Implementing and Enforcing International Law.” In Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation, edited by Young, Margaret A, 85–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zerk, Jennifer A. 2006. Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitations and Opportunities in International Law . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer. 2011. “Neither ‘Public’ nor ‘Private’, ‘National’ nor ‘International’: Transnational Corporate Governance from a Legal Pluralist Perspective.” Journal of Law and Society 38(1): 50–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation . Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar