Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:00:02.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Delegation without borders: On individual rights, constitutions and the global order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2012

ERIC BROUSSEAU ,
JEROME SGARD  and
YVES SCHEMEIL
ERIC BROUSSEAU*
Affiliation:
Université Paris Dauphine, Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France
JEROME SGARD*
Affiliation:
Sciences-Po (CERI), 56 rue Jacob, 75006 Paris, France
YVES SCHEMEIL*
Affiliation:
Sciences po Grenoble BP 48, 38040 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
*
*Email: [email protected]
†Email: [email protected]
‡Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political and economic rights are envisaged as the outcome of an ongoing bargain between citizens and their rulers. Over the long run, this constitutive process shapes the development of both the economy and the state. Globalization, however, corresponds to a period where both the market and civil society extend far beyond the borders of the initial political compact. Hence, citizens may not only ask that cross-border transactions be made easier; they may also challenge the institutional cohesion and integrity of the classical, Westphalian state, i.e., its legal and judicial order, and its bureaucratic capabilities. We are proposing a schematic description of how this political process may gradually exit the national perimeter and deliver four possible models of international or global governance, depending upon the potential structuring of coalitions between the potential winners of the globalization both in the elite and in society, and the losers; national games being ultimately arbitrated by the international competition among elites, but also by the possible formation of global coalitions of citizens and merchants.

Keywords

constitutional commitmenteconomic developmenteconomics of institutionsfederalismpolitical economyrule of lawstate
Type
Articles
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 2012 , pp. 455 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. ‘‘Hard Law and Soft Law in International Governance.’’ International Organization 54(3):421–56.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Spolaore, Enrico. 2003. The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2006. ‘‘Delegation to International Courts and the Limits of Recontracting Political Power.’’ In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by Hawkins, Darren G. et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 312–38.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2008. ‘‘Agents or Trustees? International Courts in their Political Context.’’ European Journal of International Relations 14(1):33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, José E. 2006. ‘‘International Organizations: Then and Now.’’ American Journal of International Law 100(2):324–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. [1958] 1998. ‘‘Two Concepts of Liberty.’’ In The Proper Study of Mankind – An Anthology of Essays, edited by Hardy, Henry and Hausheer, Roger. London: Pimlico: 191–242.Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A., and Kelley, Judith G.. 2008. ‘‘The Concept of International Delegation.’’ Law and Contemporary Problems. 71(1):1–37.Google Scholar
Briggs, Adrian. 2008. The Conflict of Laws. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brousseau, Eric, Schemeil, Yves, and Sgard, Jérôme. 2010. ‘‘Bargaining on Law and Bureaucracies, A Constitutional Theory of Development.’’ Journal of Comparative Economics, 38(3):253–66.Google Scholar
Brütsch, Christian, and Lehmkuhl, Dirk. 2007. ‘‘Complex Legalization and the Many Moves to Law.’’ In Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations, edited by Brütsch, C. and Lehmkuhl, D.. London: Routledge: 9–32.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobner, Petra, and Loughlin, Martin, eds 2010. The Twilight of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fassbender, Bardo. 2007. ‘‘The Meaning of International Constitutional Law.’’ In Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Models, edited by Tsagourias, Nicholas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 307–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, Ruide, J. P., and Weingast, Barry R.. 2005. ‘‘Self-Enforcing Federalism,’’ Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 21(1):103–35.Google Scholar
Finer, Samuel E. 1997. The History of Government from the Earliest Times, vol. III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkin, Kathryn. 1998. ‘‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.’’ International Organization 52(4): 887–917.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg. 2001. ‘‘The Meaning of New Medievalism.’’ European Journal of International Relations 7(4):475–502.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and McAdams, Richard. 2004. ‘‘Adjudicating in Anarchy: An Expressive Theory of International Dispute Resolution.’’ William and Mary Law Review 45(4):1229–1339.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Alexis. 1996. ‘‘Squaring the Circle: The Domestic Sources of International Cooperation.’’ International Organization 50(2):349–73.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. 2002. ‘‘Institutions and Impersonal Exchange: From Communal to Individual Responsibility.’’ Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 158(1):168–204.Google Scholar
Grinberg, Martine. 2006. Ecrire les coutumes, les droits seigneuriaux en France, XVIe–XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., and Landsidle, Jennifer. 2008. ‘‘The Myth of International Delegation.’’ California Law Review 96(6):1693–1723.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. ‘‘Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?’’ Political Theory 29(6):766–81.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. 2008. ‘‘International Delegation and State Sovereignty.’’ Law and Contemporary Problems 71(1):115–49.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel L. and Tierney, Michael J.. 2006. ‘‘Delegation under anarchy: states, international organizations, and principal-agent theory.’’ In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by Hawkins, Darren G. et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel. 1998. ‘‘Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions.’’ World Politics 50(2):203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, John H. 1957. ‘‘Rise and Demise of the Territorial State.’’ World Politics 9(4):473–93.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. ‘‘Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational.’’ International Organization 54(3):457–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, B. 2005. ‘‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law.’’ Law and Contemporary Problems 68(3):15–62.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 2008. ‘‘When, What, and Why Do States Choose to Delegate?’’ Law and Contemporary Problems 71(1): 151–92.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. ‘‘Sovereignty and its Discontents.’’ In Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy by Stephen Krasner. Princeton: Princeton University Press: chap 1.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 2004. ‘‘Sharing Sovereignty.’’ International Security 29(2):85:120.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico. 2010. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, Matthias. 2006. ‘‘Beyond Golf Clubs and the Judicialization of Politics: Why Europe Has a Constitution Properly So Called?’’ American Journal of Comparative Law 54:505–30.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N., and Adamson, Hoebel E.. 1941. The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. 1995. ‘‘The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now.’’ European Law Journal 1(3):259–66.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. 2001. ‘‘Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance.’’ European Union Politics 2(1):103–22.Google Scholar
Maloney, William M. 2004. ‘‘Informality Revisited.’’ World Development 32(7):1159–78.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. ‘‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics.’’ International Organization 51(4):513–53.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig N. 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance Since 1850. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C., Wallis, John J., and Weingast, Barry R.. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oates, Wallace E. 1999. ‘‘An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.’’ Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3):1120–49.Google Scholar
Oates, Wallace E. 2005. ‘‘Toward a Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism.’’ International Tax and Public Finance 12(4):349–73.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2001. ‘‘Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth.’’ International Organization 55(2):251–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padoa-Schioppa, Antonio, ed. 1997. Legislation and Justice: Origins of the Modern State in Europe, 13th to 18th Centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Joel R. 2008. ‘‘The Transformation of International Comity.’’ Law and Contemporary Problems 71(3):19–38.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1999. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1973. Economic Analysis of Law. Little, Brown [8th edn, 2011].Google Scholar
Rajan, Raghuram, and Zingales, Luigi. 2004. Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reinalda, Bob, and Verbeek, Bertjan, eds. 1998. Autonomous Policy Making by International Organizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reinalda, Bob, and Verbeek, Bertjan 2004. Decision-Making within International Organizations. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1997. ‘‘The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions.’’ International Organization 51(4):555–89.Google Scholar
Rogoff, Kenneth. 1985. ‘‘The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target.’’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 100(4):1169–90.Google Scholar
Scotchmer, Suzanne. 2004. Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Martin. 2000. Theory of the Global State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Niels S. 2008. ‘‘International Delegations and the Values of Federalism. Law and Contemporary Problems.’’ 71(1):94–113.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 1998. ‘‘Court to Court.’’ American Journal of International Law 92(4):708–12.Google Scholar
Soares de Oliveira, Ricardo. 2007. ‘‘Business Success, Angola-style: Postcolonial Politics and the Rise and Rise of Sonangol.’’ Journal of Modern African Studies 45(4):595–619.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitor: An Analysis of Systems Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 1994. ‘‘What is Supranational Constitution? An Essay in International Relations Theory.’’ The Review of Politics 56(3):441–74.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2009. ‘‘Constitutionalism, Legal Pluralism, and International Regimes. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 16(2):621–45.Google Scholar
Taussig, Michael. 2003. Law in a Lawless Land: Diary of a Limpieza in Colombia. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Teitz, Louise Ellen. 2005. ‘‘The Hague choice of court convention: Validating party autonomy and providing an alternative to arbitration.’’ American Journal of Comparative Law 53(3):543–58.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 1997. ‘‘Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society.’’ In Global Law Without a State, edited by Teubner, Gunther. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth: 3–30.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil. 2008. ‘‘Taking Constitutionalism beyond the State.’’ Political Studies. 56:519–43.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. ‘‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.’’ International Organization 46(2):391–425.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2003. ‘‘Why a World Government is Inevitable.’’ European Journal of International Relations.’’ 9(4):491–542.Google Scholar