Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:48:39.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cosmopolitan legal order: Constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

ALEC STONE SWEET
ALEC STONE SWEET*
Affiliation:
Yale Law School, 127 Wall Street, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The European Convention on Human Rights is rapidly evolving into a cosmopolitan legal order: a transnational legal system in which all public officials bear the obligation to fulfill the fundamental rights of every person within their jurisdiction. The emergence of the system depended on certain deep, structural transformations of law and politics in Europe, including the consolidation of a zone of peace and economic interdependence, of constitutional pluralism at the national level, and of rights cosmopolitanism at the transnational level. Framed by Kantian ideas, the paper develops a theoretical account of a cosmopolitan legal system, provides an overview of how the ECHR system operates, and establishes criteria for its normative assessment.

Keywords

ECHRhuman rightsKantcosmopolitanismjudicial review
Type
Research Article
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 53 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, Karen. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anagnostou, Dia, and Psychogiopoulou, Evangelia (eds). 2010. European Court of Human Rights and the Rights of Marginalised Individuals and Minorities in National Context. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andenæs, Mads, and Bjørge, Eirik. 2011. “National Implementation of ECHR Rights: Kant’s Categorical Imperative and the Convention.” University of Oslo Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, No. 2011/15: 59 pp.Google Scholar
Anderson-Gold, Sharon. 2001. Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Anderson-Gold, Sharon. 1988. “War and Resistance: Kant’s Implicit Doctrine of Human Rights.” Journal of Social Philosophy 19(1):37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 2001. “Human Rights as a Common Concern.” American Political Science Review 95(2):269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2011. “Cosmopolitanism without Illusions.” In Dignity in Adversity. Human Rights in Troubled Times, edited by Benhabib, Seyla. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2009. “Claiming Rights across Borders: International Human Rights and Democratic Sovereignty.” American Political Science Review 103(4):691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Citizens and Residents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, Samantha. 2012. “The Erga Omnes Effect of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.” In The European Court of Human Rights after Protocol 14 – First Assessment and Perspectives, edited by Besson, Samantha. Zürich: Schulthess.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha. 2008. “The Reception Process in Ireland and the UK.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller, Helen and Stone Sweet, Alec, 31–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bjørge, Eirik. 2011. “National Supreme Courts and the Development of ECHR Rights.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 9(1):5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Garrett Wallace. 2009. Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Garrett Wallace. 2006. “Kantian Cosmopolitan Law and the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution.” History of Political Thought 27(4):661–84.Google Scholar
Brown, Garrett Wallace, and Held, David. 2010. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael, Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven (eds). 1996. Debating the Democratic Peace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buyse, Antoine, and Hamilton, Michael. 2011. “Conclusions.” In Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR: Justice, Politics and Rights, edited by Buyse, A. and Hamilton, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyse, Antoine, and Hamilton, Michael (eds). 2011. Transitional Jurisprudence and the ECHR: Justice, Politics and Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candela Soriano, Mercedes. 2008. “The Reception Process in Spain and Italy.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller, H. and Stone Sweet, A., 393–450. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2001. “Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the Democratic Peace as a Macrohistorical Learning Process.” American Political Science Review 96(1):15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 2004. “Minimalism About Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For?” Journal of Political Philosophy 12(2):190–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey, and Trachtman, Joel. 2009. Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael. 1986. “Liberalism and World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80(4):1151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Alessandro. 2003. “Two Notions of Humanity and the Judgment Argument for Human Rights.” Political Theory 31(3):392–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin. 2000. Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen. 2008. “Human Rights as International Constitutional Rights.” The European Journal of International Law 19(4):749–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlicki, Lech. 2007. “Constitutional Courts versus Supreme Courts.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5(1):44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gondek, Michael. 2009. The Reach of Human Rights in a Globalizing World: Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Cambridge: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Hammer, Leonard, and Emmert, Frank. 2011. The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in Central and Eastern Europe. The Hague: Eleven.Google Scholar
Held, David. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideas and Realities. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Voeten, Erik. 2011. “Do European Court of Human Rights Judgments Promote Legal and Policy Change?” Working Paper available at:http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2402/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmeister, Frank. 2006. “Germany: Status of European Convention on Human Rights in Domestic Law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 4(4):722–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, Wade. 1996. “Kant’s Third Image: Systemic Sources of the Liberal Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 40(1):45–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. 2001. Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaboğlu, İbrahim, and Koutnatzis, Stylianos-Ioannis. 2008. “The Reception Process in Greece and Turkey.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller, Helen and Stone Sweet, Alec, 451–529. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1996 (1797) (Gregor, M. (ed)). The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2006 (1795; trans. Clocasure, D.). Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1994 (1784). “What is Enlightenment?” In Kant’s Political Writings, 2nd edn edited by Reiss, H., 54–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelemen, Daniel. 2010. Eurolegalism: The Rise of Adversarial Legalism in the European Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Helen, and Stone Sweet, Alec (eds). 2008. A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne, and Ulfstein, Geir. 2009. The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. 2011. Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, Nico. 2010. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. 2009. “The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State.” In Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, edited by Dunhoff, Jeffrey and Trachtman, Joel, 258–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. 2005. “The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty.” European Law Journal 11(3):262–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. 2004. “Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 2(3):574–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert Abdelgawad, Elisabeth, and Weber, Anne. 2008. “The Reception Process in France and Germany.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller, Helen and Stone Sweet, Alec, 107–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nichol, Danny. 2005. “Original Intent and the European Convention on Human Rights.” Public Law [2005]:152–72.Google Scholar
Nickel, John. 2006. Making Sense of Human Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nußberger, Angelika. 2008. “The Reception Process in Russia and Ukraine.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller, Helen and Stone Sweet, Alec, 603–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neal, John, and Russett, Bruce. 1999. “The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” World Politics, 52(1):1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neal, John, Russett, Bruce, and Berbaum, Michael. 1999. “The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” International Studies Quarterly 47(3):371–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. 2006. “Multilevel Trade Governance Requires Multilevel Constitutionalism.” In Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation, edited by Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E-U., 5–36. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2009. “Kant’s Vision of a Just World Order.” In The Blackwell Guide to Kant’s Ethics, edited by Hill, T., 196–208. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2000. “The International Significance of Human Rights.” Journal of Ethics, 4(1-2):45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech. 2009. “Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalization of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments.” Human Rights Law Review 9(3):397–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Stone Sweet, Alec, and Weiler, Joseph (eds). 1998. The European Court and the National Courts––Doctrine and Jurisprudence: Legal Change in its Social Context. Oxford: Hart Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Matthew. 2008. “Rethinking Sovereignty, Rethinking Revolution.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 36(4):405–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajo, Andre (ed). 2004. Human Rights with Modesty: The Problem of Universalism. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin, and Stone Sweet, Alec. 2002. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Eric. 1981. “Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution.” American Journal of International Law 75(1):1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Alec. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2010a. “Constitutions, Rights, and Judicial Power.” In Comparative Politics, edited by Caramani, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2010b. “The European Court of Justice and the Judicialization of EU Governance.” Living Reviews in European Union Governance. Published online at: http://europeangovernance.livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2010-2/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2009. “Sur la constitutionnalisation de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme: la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme conçue comme une Cour constitutionnelle” Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme 80:923–44.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2004. The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 1999. “Judicialization and the Construction of Governance.” Comparative Political Studies 32(2):147–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec and Mathews, Jud. 2008. “Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 47(1):68–149.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec and Stranz, Kathleen. 2012. “Rights adjudication and constitutional pluralism in Germany and Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 19(1):91–107.Google Scholar
Von Staden, Andreas. 2009. Shaping Human Rights Policy in Liberal Democracies: Assessing and Explaining Compliance with the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. Doctoral Dissertation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1994. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Ola. 2009. “The Reception Process in Sweden and Norway.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Keller, Helen and Stone Sweet, Alec, 165–228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar