Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:25:08.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zooming in on norm research: Towards a suitable scale for the Shanghai Mixed Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

STEFAN KROLL
STEFAN KROLL*
Affiliation:
Goethe University and Cluster of Excellence ‘The Formation of Normative Orders’, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 6, 60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Research on norms in international relations has recently focused increasingly on the localisation and translation of normative patterns. While there is a strong interest in studying local diversity as embedded in global contexts, the question of how to accomplish this still poses a methodological challenge. In order to make visible the different global, national, local, and situational dimensions of diffusion processes, this article applies the technique of ‘zooming in’ on the respective levels. The article studies the case of a mixed court in Shanghai at the end of the nineteenth century. The court is both a special court in the context of extraterritoriality and a representative case of hybrid normativity and decision making. As this article shows, the practices of the mixed court are not reducible to its single foreign, national or local components. On the contrary, it represents an original normative institution combining various normative and procedural elements. In describing this hybrid institution, the article refers to the concept of multinormativity, understood as an extension of what has been discussed as legal pluralism, since it does not take Western concepts of the law as a major point of reference.

Keywords

Chinacontestationmultinormativitynorm diffusionscale
Type
Research Article
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 383 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Finnemore, M and Sikkink, K, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’ (1998) 52(4) International Organization 887.Google Scholar

2 Deitelhoff, N and Zimmermann, L, ‘Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Validity of International Norms’ (2013) No 18 PRIF Working Paper 1, 1Google Scholar.

3 Acharya, A, ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’ (2004) 58(2) International Organization 239.Google Scholar

4 Acharya, A, ‘Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies’ (2014) 58 International Studies Quarterly 647, 652Google Scholar.

5 Vec, M, ‘Multinormativität in der Rechtsgeschichte’ in Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ed), Jahrbuch 2008 (Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 2009) 155Google Scholar.

6 Duve, T, ‘European Legal History – Global Perspectives. Working Paper for the Colloquium ‘‘European Normativity – Global Historical Perspectives’’, Max-Planck-Institute for European Legal History, September, 2–4, 2013’ (2013) Max Planck Institute for European Legal History – Research Paper Series 1, 21Google Scholar.

7 Ruskola, T, Legal Orientalism: China, the United States, and Modern Law (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2013) 185–97.Google Scholar

8 Cassel, PK, Grounds of Judgment: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Power in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012) 63–84Google Scholar.

9 Rublack, U, ‘The Status of Historical Knowledge’ in Rublack, U (ed), A Concise Companion to History (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011) 57, 61.Google Scholar

10 Finnemore and Sikkink (n 1).

11 Meyer, JW et al., ‘World Society and the Nation State’ (1997) 103 American Journal of Sociology 144.Google Scholar

12 Chorev, N, ‘Changing Global Norms through Reactive Diffusion: The Case of Intellectual Property Protection of AIDS Drugs’ (2012) 77(5) American Sociological Review 831Google Scholar; Halliday, TC and Carruthers, BG, ‘The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm Making and National Lawmaking in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes’ (2007) 112(4) American Journal of Sociology 1135Google Scholar.

13 Risse, T, Ropp, S and Sikkink, K (eds), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).Google Scholar

14 Acharya (n 3).

15 Zimmermann, L, ‘Same Same or Different? Norm Diffusion between Resistance, Compliance, and Localization in Post-Conflict States’ (2016) 17(1) International Studies Perspectives 98Google Scholar.

16 For a short overview over different approaches see Wolff, J and Zimmermann, L, ‘Between Banyans and Battle Scenes: Liberal Norms, Contestation, and the Limits of Critique’ (2016) 42(3) Review of International Studies 516–18.Google Scholar

17 Ibid 518.

18 Ibid 533.

19 Wiener, A, A Theory of Contestation (Springer, Heidelberg, 2014) 45Google Scholar.

20 In her Theory of Contestation Antje Wiener argues that ‘international relations are located within a global context where formal political borders and invisible cultural boundaries do not necessarily overlap. Therefore, inter-national relations need to be understood as inter-cultural relations’. See Wiener, A, A Theory of Contestation (Springer, Heidelberg, 2014) 3Google Scholar.

21 Ibid 41–2.

22 Cluster of Excellence ‘Asia and Europe in a Global Context’ 2015: Conference Concept. Available at <http://www.asia-europe.uni-heidelberg.de/en/newsevents/events/annual-conference/archive/annual-conference-2015.html>.

23 Nicolini, D, ‘Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections’ (2009) 30(12) Organization Studies 1391, 1396Google Scholar.

24 Junk, J and Rauer, V, ‘Combining Methods: Connections and Zooms in Analysing Hybrids’ in Schlag, G, Junk, J and Daase, C (eds), Transformations of Security Studies: Dialogues, Discipline and Diversity (Routledge, London, 2016) 232Google Scholar.

25 Ibid 231.

26 Knorr Cetina, K and Bruegger, U, ‘Global Microstructures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets’ (2002) 107(4) American Journal of Sociology 908–9Google Scholar.

27 Bueger, C and Gadinger, F, ‘The Play of International Practice’ (2015) 59(3) International Studies Quarterly 449, 456Google Scholar.

28 Ibid 451.

29 Ibid 453.

30 Ibid 456.

31 Heintz, B, ‘Emergenz und Reduktion: Neu Perspektiven auf das Mikro-Makro-Problem’ (2004) 56(1) Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 1, 27Google Scholar.

32 Osterhammel, J, Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts (CH Beck, München, 2009) 422.Google Scholar

33 Ibid 423.

34 Lee, TV, ‘Risky Business: Courts, Culture, and the Marketplace’ (1993) 47 University of Miami Law Review 1335, 1347Google Scholar.

35 Ibid 1345.

36 Dezalay, Y and Garth, BG, Asian Legal Revivals: Lawyers in the Shadow of Empire (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2010) 35Google Scholar.

37 Ibid 36.

38 Cassel (n 8) 67–8.

39 Ibid 72.

40 Berchtold, J, ‘Exterritorialität im Zeitalter der ungleichen Verträge’ in Klump, R and Vec, M (eds) Völkerrecht und Weltwirtschaft im 19. Jahrhundert (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2012) 221, 222Google Scholar.

41 Benton, L, Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002) 210Google Scholar.

42 Wang, D, China’s Unequal Treaties: Narrating National History (Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, 2005) 10.Google Scholar

43 Horowitz, RS, ‘International Law and State Transformation in China, Siam, and the Ottoman Empire during the Nineteenth Century’ (2005) 15(4) Journal of World History 445, 461–62Google Scholar.

44 Oppenheim, L, International Law: A Treatise, Vol. I Peace (Longmans, Green, and Co, London, 1905) 481Google Scholar.

45 Gong, GW, The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984) 8Google Scholar.

46 Cassel (n 8) 63; Wang (n 42) 11.

47 Oppenheim (n 44) 482.

48 Berchtold (n 40) 221.

49 Hammond, K, The Shanghai Mixed Court 1863–1880: Colonial institution building and the creation of legal knowledge as a process of interaction and mediation between the Chinese and the British, Master Thesis (Simon Fraser University, 2007) 44Google Scholar.

50 Lee, TV, Law and Local Autonomy at the International Mixed Court of Shanghai, unpublished PhD Thesis (Yale University, 1990) 215Google Scholar.

51 Art 2 ‘Rules for the Mixed Court (1869)’ in Mayers, WF (ed), Treaties between the Empire of China and Foreign Powers together with Regulations for the Conduct of Foreign Trade (J. Broadhurst Tootal, ‘North China Herald’ Office, Shanghai, 1877) 222–3Google Scholar.

52 Benton (n 41) 211.

53 Stephens, TB, Order and Discipline in China: The Shanghai Mixed Court 1911–27 (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA and London, 1992) 66Google Scholar.

54 Art 4 (n 51).

55 Seward, GF, ‘Report on the working of the Mixed Court’ (1875) 12 June The North China Herald 582Google Scholar.

56 Lee (n 50) 117.

57 Anon., ‘The Mixed Court: A Court of first instance’ (1884) 24 December The North China Herald 702Google Scholar.

58 Yates, MT, ‘Report on the working of the Mixed Court’ (1875) 12 June The North China Herald 582Google Scholar.

59 Hammond (n 49) 53.

60 Anon. (n 57) 702.

61 Hudson, MO, ‘The Rendition of the International Mixed Court at Shanghai’ (1927) 21(3) The American Journal of International Law 451, 452Google Scholar.

62 Hammond (n 49) 24–5.

63 Thomson, JS, The government of the International Settlement at Shanghai: A Study in the Politics of an International Area, PhD Thesis (Columbia University, 1954) 4Google Scholar.

64 Jackson, I, Managing Shanghai: The International Settlement Administration and the Development of the City, 1900–1943, PhD Thesis (University of Bristol, 2012) 6Google Scholar.

65 Thomson (n 63) 22.

66 Lee (n 50) 380.

67 See also Meighen, JFD, ‘The International Mixed Court of Shanghai’ (1926) 31 Commercial Law League Journal 529, 529Google Scholar.

68 Lee (n 50) Abstract.

69 Ibid 10.

70 Ibid 381.

71 Meighen (n 67) 529.

72 Anon., ‘The Mixed Court,’ (1884) 8 August The North China Herald, 151Google Scholar.

73 Stephens (53) 45.

74 Ruskola (n 7).

75 Lee (n 50) 297–306.

76 Ibid 306–8.

77 Stephens (n 53) 98.

78 Hammond (n 49) 52–3.

79 Luhmann, N, Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1993) 129 and 134–5Google Scholar.

80 Wiener, A, ‘Global Constitutionalism: Mapping an Emerging Field’ (2011) Paper Prepared for the Conference Constitutionalism in a New Key? Cosmopolitan, Pluralist and Public-Reason Oriented, Berlin, WZB, Humboldt University, 28–29 January, 1, 2. Available at <https://cosmopolis.wzb.eu/content/programs/conkey_Wiener_Mapping-Field.pdf>>Google Scholar.

81 Wiener, A et al., ‘Global constitutionalism: Human rights, democracy and the rule of law’ (2012) 1(1) Global Constitutionalism 1, 7–8Google Scholar.

82 Cassel (n 8) 9.

83 Bermann, PS, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012) 13Google Scholar.

84 Bermann, PS, ‘From International Law to Law and Globalization’ (2005) 43(2) Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 485, 508Google Scholar.

85 Zumbansen, P, ‘Defining the Space of Transnational Law: Legal Theory, Global Governance, and Legal Pluralism’ (2012) 21 Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 305Google Scholar.

86 Merry, SE, ‘Legal Pluralism’ (1988) 22(5) Law & Society Review 869, 874Google Scholar.

87 Tamanaha, BZ, ‘A Non-Essentialist Version of Legal Pluralism’ (2000) 27(2) Journal of Law and Society 296, 313Google Scholar.

88 Merry (n 86) 878.

89 Günther, K, ‘Normativer Rechtspluralismus: Eine Kritik’ (2014) No 3 Normative Orders Working Paper 1, 4Google Scholar.

90 M Vec (n 5).

91 Vec, M, ‘Die Bindungswirkung van Standards aus rechtsgeschichtlicher Perspektive: Globale Normsetzung und Normiplementation am Beispiel des Weltpostvereins von 1878’ in Möllers, TMJ (ed), Geltung und Faktizität von Standards (Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2009) 221, 232Google Scholar.

92 Heintz (n 31) 27.

93 Ruskola (n 7) 185ff.

94 On judicial law-making see generally Cardozo, BN, The Nature of the Judicial Process (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1921)Google Scholar; von Bogdandy, A and Venzke, I, ‘Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 979Google Scholar.

95 Hoyle, MSW, ‘The Structure and Laws of the Mixed Courts of Egypt’ (1985) 1(3) Arab Law Quarterly 327Google Scholar.