Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:21:45.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE UNKNOTTING NUMBER AND CLASSICAL INVARIANTS II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2014

MACIEJ BORODZIK  and
STEFAN FRIEDL
MACIEJ BORODZIK
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland e-mail: [email protected]
STEFAN FRIEDL
Affiliation:
Mathematisches Institut, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Germany e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In [3] the authors (M. Borodzik and S. Friedl, Unknotting number and classical invariants (preprint 2012)) associated to a knot K ⊂ S3 an invariant nℝ(K), which is defined using the Blanchfield form and which gives a lower bound on the unknotting number. In this paper, we express nℝ(K) in terms of the Levine-Tristram signatures and nullities of K. We also show in the proof that the Blanchfield form for any knot K is diagonalisable over ℝ[t±1].

Keywords

Primary 57M27
Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 657 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2014 

References

REFERENCES

1.Blanchfield, R. C., Intersection theory of manifolds with operators with applications to knot theory, Ann. Math. 65 (1957), 340–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Borodzik, M. and Friedl, S., Knotorious World Wide Web page. Available at http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~mcboro/knotorious.php, accessed 30 June 2012.Google Scholar
3.Borodzik, M. and Friedl, S., Unknotting number and classical invariants I (preprint 2012) arxiv 1203.3225.Google Scholar
4.Borodzik, M. and Friedl, S., The Algebraic unknotting number and the Blanchfield form (preprint 2013) arxiv 1308.6105.Google Scholar
5.Borodzik, M. and Némethi, A., Hodge-type structures as link invariants, Ann. Inst. Fourier 63 (2013), 269–301.Google Scholar
6.Cha, J. C. and Livingston, C., KnotInfo: Table of knot invariants. Available at http://www.indiana.edu/~knotinfo, accessed 20 June 2012.Google Scholar
7.Kirby, R. (Editor), Problems in low dimensional topology, in Geometric topology: 1993 Georgia international topology conference, American Math. Society, Providence (1997), 35-473.Google Scholar
8.Ko, K. H., A Seifert matrix interpretation of Cappell and Shaneson's approach to link cobordisms, Math. Proc Cambridge Philos. Soc 106 (1989), 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Lang, S., Algebra, Revised 3rd ed, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 211 (Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 2002).Google Scholar
10.Levine, J., Knot cobordism groups in codimension two, Comm. Math. Helv. 44 (1969) 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Livingston, C., Knot 4-genus and the rank of classes in W(ℚ(t)), Pacific J. Math. 252 (2011), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Milnor, J., On isometries of inner product spaces, Inv. Math. 8 (1969), 83–97.Google Scholar
13.Murakami, H., Algebraic unknotting operation, Q&A. Gen. Topology 8, 283–292 (1990).Google Scholar
14.Némethi, A., The real Seifert form and the spectral pairs of isolated hypersurface singularities, Comp. Math. 98 (1995), 23–41.Google Scholar
15.Neumann, W., Invariants of plane curve singularities, in Knots, braids and singularities (Plans-sur-Bex, Seminar 1982), Monogr. Enseign. Math., vol. 31 (Enseignement Math., Geneva, 1983) 223–232.Google Scholar
16.Ranicki, A., Exact sequences in the algebraic theory of surgery, Mathematical Notes, vol. 26 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1981).Google Scholar
17.Rudin, W., Principles of mathematical analysis, 3rd ed., International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1976).Google Scholar
18.Tristram, A., Some cobordism invariants for links, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 66 (1969), 251–264.Google Scholar