Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:39:37.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Results involving Hypergeometric and E-Functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

C. B. Rathie
C. B. Rathie
Affiliation:
Maharana Bhupal College, Udaipur
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recently R. S. Varma [11] gave the generalisation

for the Laplace transform

Since

(1) gives (2) when k = − m + ½.

We shall represent (1) by

and as usual, (2) will be denoted by

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 1955 , pp. 132 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1955

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bromwich, T. J. I'A., Theory of Infinite Series,(1908), p. 457.Google Scholar
(2)Goldstein, S., “Operational representation of Whittaker's confluent liypergeometric function and Weber's parabolic cylinder function”, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., (2), 34 (1932), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Gupta, H. C., “On Operational calculus”, Proc. National Inst. Sci. India, (3), 14 (1948), 131–156.Google Scholar
(4)Shanker, , Hari, , “On confluent hypergeometric functions which are Hankel transforms of each other”, Jour. Indian Math. Soc., 7 (1943), 63–67.Google Scholar
(5)MacRobert, T. M., “Induction proofs of the relations between certain asymptotic expansions and corresponding generalised hypergeometric series”, Proc. Royal Soc. Edin., (1), 58 (1937), 1–13.Google Scholar
(6)MacRobert, T. M., “Some formulae for the E-function”, Phil. Mag., (7), 31 (1941), 254–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)McLachlan, N. W., and Humbert, P., Formulaire pour le Calcul symbolique, (1950), Fasc. 100.Google Scholar
(8)Kumar, , Ram, , “A pair of functions which are Hankel transforms of each other”, Ganita, (2), 3 (1952), 79–84.Google Scholar
(9)Rathie, C. B., “A study of a generalisation of the Laplace's Integral”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India, 21 (1952), 231–249.Google Scholar
(10)Rathie, C. B., “Some infinite integrals involving E-functions”, Jour. Indian Math. Soc., (4), 17 (1953), 167–175.Google Scholar
(11)Varma, R. S., “On a generalisation of Laplace Integral”, Proc Nat. Acad. Sci. India, 20 (1951).Google Scholar
(12)Ragab, F. M., “Integrals of E-functions expressed in terms of E-functions”, Proc Glasg. Math. Ass., 1 (1953), 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar