Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:45:13.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

QF-3 endomorphism rings of Σ-quasi-projective modules†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

José L. Gómez Pardo  and
Nieves Rodríguez González
José L. Gómez Pardo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Algebra, Faculted de Ciencials Químicas y Matemáticals, Universidad de Murcia, 30001 Murcia, Spain
Nieves Rodríguez González
Affiliation:
Departamento de Algebra, Faculted de Ciencials Químicas y Matemáticals, Universidad de Murcia, 30001 Murcia, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A ring R is called left QF-3 if it has a minimal faithful left R-module. The endomorphism ring of such a module has been recently studied in [7], where conditions are given for it to be a left PF ring or a QF ring. The object of the present paper is to study, more generally, when the endomorphism ring of a Σ-quasi-projective module over any ring R is left QF-3. Necessary and sufficient conditions for this to happen are given in Theorem 2. An useful concept in this investigation is that of a QF-3 module which has been introduced in [11]. If M is a finitely generated quasi-projective module and σ[M] denotes the category of all modules isomorphic to submodules of modules generated by M, then we show that End(RM) is a left QF-3 ring if and only if the quotient module of M modulo its torsion submodule (in the torsion theory of σ[M] canonically defined by M) is a QF-3 module (Corollary 4). Finally, we apply these results to the study of the endomorphism ring of a minimal faithful R-module over a left QF-3 ring, extending some of the results of [7].

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , May 1988 , pp. 215 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1988

References

1.Albu, T. and Năstăsescu, C., Relative finiteness in module theory (Marcel Dekker, 1984).Google Scholar
2.Anderson, F. W. and Fuller, K. R., Rings and categories of modules (Springer-Verlag, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Colby, R. R. and Rutter, E. A. Jr, QF-3 rings with zero singular ideal, Pacific J. Math. 28 (1969), 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Faith, C. and Walker, E. A., Direct sum representations of injective modules, J. Algebra 5 (1967), 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Hernández, J. L. García and Pardo, J. L. Gómez, Self-injective and PF endomorphism rings, Israeli. Math., 58 (1987), 324–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kasch, F., Modules and rings (Academic Press, 1982).Google Scholar
7.Page, S. S., FPF endomorphism rings with applications to QF-3 rings, Comm. Algebra 14 (1986), 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ringel, C. M. and Tachikawa, H., QF-3 rings, J. Reine Angew. Math. 272 (1975), 49–72.Google Scholar
9.Rutter, E. A. Jr, PF and QF-3 rings, Arch. Math. 19 (1968), 608–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Tachikawa, H., On left QF-3 rings, Pacific J. Math. 32 (1970), 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Wisbauer, R., Decomposition properties in module categories Acta Univ. Carolinae Math. Phys. 26 (1985), 57–68.Google Scholar