Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:00:19.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the spectrum of n-tuples of p-hyponormal operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

B. P. Duggal
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 36, Al-Khod 123, Sultanate of Oman, E-Mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let B(H) denote the algebra of operators (i.e., bounded linear transformations) on the Hilbert space H. AB (H) is said to be p-hyponormal (0<p<l), if (AA*)γ < (A*A)p. (Of course, a l-hyponormal operator is hyponormal.) The p-hyponormal property is monotonic decreasing in p and a p-hyponormal operator is q-hyponormal operator for all 0<q <p. Let A have the polar decomposition A = U |A|, where U is a partial isometry and |A| denotes the (unique) positive square root of A*A.If A has equal defect and nullity, then the partial isometry U may be taken to be unitary. Let ℋU(p) denote the class of p -hyponormal operators for which U in A = U |A| is unitary. ℋU(l/2) operators were introduced by Xia and ℋU(p) operators for a general 0<p<1 were first considered by Aluthge (see [1,14]); ℋU(p) operators have since been considered by a number of authors (see [3, 4, 5, 9, 10] and the references cited in these papers). Generally speaking, ℋU(p) operators have spectral properties similar to those of hyponormal operators. Indeed, let A ε ℋU(p), (0<p <l/2), have the polar decomposition A = U|A|, and define the ℋW(p + 1/2) operator  by A = |A|1/2U |A|l/2 Let  = V |Â| Â= |Â|1/2VÂ|ÂAcirc;|1/2. Then we have the following result.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1998

References

REFERENCES

1.Aluthge, Ariyadasa, On p-hyponormal operators for 0<p< 1, Integral Equations Operator Theory 13 (1990), 307315.Google Scholar
2.Chō, Muneo, On the joint Weyl spectrum III, Ada Sci. Math. (Szeged) 56 (1992), 365367.Google Scholar
3.Chō, Muneo, spectral properties of p-hyponormal operators, Glasgow Math. J. 36 (1994), 117122.Google Scholar
4.Chō, Muneo and Dash, A. T., On the joint spectra of doubly commuting n-tuples of semi-normal operators, Glasgow Math. J. 26 (1985), 4750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chō, M. and Itoh, M., On spectra of p-hyponormal operators, Integral Equations Operator Theory 23 (1995), 287293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Chō, Muneo and Takaguchi, Makoto, Some classes of commuting n-tuples of operators, Studia Math. 80 (1984), 245259.Google Scholar
7.Curto, Raul E., On the connectedness of invertible n-tuples, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 29 (1980), 393406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Dash, A. T., Joint essential spectra, Pacific J. Math. 64 (1976), 119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Duggal, B. P., On quasi-similar p-hyponormal operators, Integral Equations Operator Theory, 26 (1996), 338345.Google Scholar
10.Fujii, Masatoshi, Izumino, Saichi and Nakamoto, Ritsuo, Classes of operators determined by the Heinz-Kato-Furuta inequality and the Holder-McCarthy inequality, Nihonkai Math. J. 5 (1994), 6167.Google Scholar
11.Furuta, T., On the polar decomposition of an operator, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 46 (1983), 261268.Google Scholar
12.Putnam, C. R., On the spectra of semi-normal operators, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 119 (1965), 509523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Taylor, J. L., A joint spectrum for several commuting operators, J. Functional Analysis 6 (1970), 172191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Xia, D., Spectral theory of hyponormal operators (Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar