Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:21:51.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP OF A HEEGAARD SPLITTING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2013

CHARALAMPOS CHARITOS ,
IOANNIS PAPADOPERAKIS  and
GEORGIOS TSAPOGAS
CHARALAMPOS CHARITOS
Affiliation:
Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, Athens 118 55, Greece e-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
IOANNIS PAPADOPERAKIS
Affiliation:
Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, Athens 118 55, Greece e-mails: [email protected], [email protected]
GEORGIOS TSAPOGAS
Affiliation:
University of the Aegean, Samos 832 00, Greece e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For the mapping class group of 3-manifold with respect to a Heegaard splitting, a simplicial complex is constructed such that its group of automorphisms is identified with the mapping class group.

Keywords

57N1057N35
Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 93 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2013 

References

REFERENCES

1.Akbas, E., A presentation for the automorphisms of the 3-sphere that preserve a genus two Heegaard splitting, Pacific J. Math. 236 (2) (2008), 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Charitos, Ch., Papadoperakis, I. and Tsapogas, G., A complex of incompressible surfaces and the mapping class group, Monatshefte für Mathematic, 167 (3–4) (2012), 405–415. doi:10.1007/s00605-012-0379-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cho, S., Homeomorphisms of the 3-sphere that preserve a Heegaard splitting of genus two, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (3) (2008), 1113–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Fomenko, A. T. and Matveev, S. V., Algorithmic and computer methods in 3-manifolds (Kluwer, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Goeritz, L., Die Abbildungen der Brezelfläche und der Volbrezel vom Gesschlect 2, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 9 (1933), 244–259.Google Scholar
6.Harvey, W., Boundary structure of the modular group, Riemann surfaces and related topics, in Proceedings of the 1978 Stony Brook conference, State University New York, Stony Brook, NY (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1978) (Ann. Math. Stud. 97 (1981), 245–251).Google Scholar
7.Hatcher, A., Lochak, P. and Schneps, L., On the Teichmüller tower of mapping class groups, J. Reine Angew. Math. 521 (2000), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Hatcher, A. and Thurston, W., A presentation for the mapping class group of a closed orientable surface, Topology 19 (3) (1980), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Margalit, D., Automorphisms of the pants complex, Duke Math. J. 121 (3) (2004), 457–479.Google Scholar
10.Masur, H. and Minsky, Y. N., Quasiconvexity in the curve complex, in The tradition of Ahlfors and Bers, III, Contemporaty Mathematics, vol. 355 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004), 309–320.Google Scholar
11.McCullough, D., Virtually geometrically finite mapping class groups of 3-manifolds, J. Differ. Geom. 33 (1) (1991), 1–65.Google Scholar
12.Scharlemann, M., Automorphisms of the 3-sphere that preserve a genus two Heegaard splitting, Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana 10 (3) (2004), 503–514 (special issue).Google Scholar