Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:45:26.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the fourth-powerfree part of x2 + 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

Benjamin M. M. de Weger
Benjamin M. M. de Weger
Affiliation:
Sportsingel 30, 2924 XN Krimpen aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that x = 59 is the largest positive integer for which the fourth-powerfree part of x2 + 2 is at most 100. This implies the solution of the problem, posed recently by J. H. E. Cohn, to prove that (x, y) = (1, 1) is the only solution in nonnegative integers to the diophantine equation x2 – 3y4 = –2, as well as a new solution to the problem, posed a long time ago by the same J. H. E. Cohn and solved before by R. Bumby and N. Tzanakis, to prove that (x, y) = (1, 1), (11, 3) are the only solutions in nonnegative integers to the diophantine equation 2x2 – 3y4 = – 1.

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 299 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1998

References

REFERENCES

1.Baker, A. and Wustholz, G., Logarithmic forms and group varieties, J. Reine Angew. Math. 442 (1993), 19–62.Google Scholar
2.Bumby, R., The diophantine equation 3x 4 – 2y 2 = 1, Math. Scand. 21 (1967), 144–148.Google Scholar
3.Cohn, J. H. E., Eight diophantine equations, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 16 (1966), 153–166.Google Scholar
4.Cohn, J. H. E., Twelve diophantine equations, Arch. Math. (Basel) 65 (1995), 130–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Laurent, M., Mignotte, M. and Nesterenko, Y., Formes linéaires en deux logarithmes et déterminants d'interpolation, J. Number Th. 55 (1995), 285–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Mignotte, M. and Pethő, A., On the system of diophantine equations x 2 – 6y 2 = –5 and x = 2z 2 –1, Math. Scand. 76 (1995), 50–60.Google Scholar
7.Tzanakis, N., Solving elliptic diophantine equations by estimating linear forms in elliptic logarithms. The case of quartic equations, Ada Arith. 75 (1996). 165–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Tzanakis, N. and de Weger, B. M. M., On the practical solution of the Thue equation, J. Number Th. 31 (1989), 99–132.Google Scholar
9.Voutier, P., Linear forms in three logarithms, Canad. J. Math, (1998), to appear.Google Scholar
10.de Weger, B. M. M., Algorithms for Diophantine equations (CWI Tract 65, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam, 1989).Google Scholar