Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T11:41:10.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on uniqueness for anisotropic fluids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

R. N. Hills
Affiliation:
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1960 Ericksen [1] introduced a simple theory of anisotropic fluids. This theory differs from the classical theory of fluids in that the deformation of the material is no longer solely described by the usual vector displacement field but requires in addition the specification of a further vector field di, termed the director. Moreover, corresponding to this increased kinematic flexibility new types of stress, body force and inertia are introduced. Leslie [2], adopting the conservation laws of [1], formulated constitutive equations similar to those considered by Ericksen and discussed the thermodynamical restrictions imposed by the Clausius–Duhem inequality. Here we shall consider the case in which at each point the director is constrained to remain a unit vector. Then the usual interpretation is to regard di as indicating a single preferred direction in the material (see for example [3]). It is thought that the physical applications of this theory are likely to lie in such areas as polymeric fluids and suspensions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1974

References

REFERENCES

1.Ericksen, J. L., Anisotropic fluids, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 4 (1960), 231237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Leslie, F. M., Some constitutive equations for anisotropic fluids, Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 19 (1966), 357370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ericksen, J. L., Continuum theory of liquid crystals, Appl. Mech. Rev. 20 (1967), 10291032.Google Scholar