Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:18:38.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A lower bound on the homological bidimension of a non-unital C*-algebra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

Olaf Ermert
Olaf Ermert
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let A be a C*-algebra. For each Banach A-bimodule X, the second continuous Hochschild cohomology group H2(A, X) of A with coefficients in X is defined (see [6]); there is a natural correspondence between the elements of this group and equivalence classes of singular, admissible extensions of A by X. Specifically this means that H2(A, X) ≠ {0} for some X if and only if there exists a Banach algebra B with Jacobson radical R such that R2 = {0}, R is complemented as a Banach space, and B/R ≅ A, but B has no strong Wedderburn decomposition; i.e., there is no closed subalgebra C of B such that B ≅ C © R. In turn this is equivalent to db A ≥ 2, where db A is the homological bidimension of A; i.e., the homological dimension of A#, the unitization of A, as an,A-bimodule [6, III. 5.15]. This paper is concerned with the following basic question, which was posed in [7].

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 435 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1998

References

REFERENCES

1.Aristov, O. Yu., The global dimension theorem for non-unital and some other separable C*-algebras, Mat. Sbornik 186 (1995), 3–18 = Russ. Acad. Sci. Sb. Math. 186 (1995), 1223–1229.Google Scholar
2.Bade, W. G., Dales, H. G. and Lykova, Z. A., Algebraic and strong splittings of extensions of Banach algebras, Mem. American Math. Soc, to appear.Google Scholar
3.Diestel, J., Sequences and series in Banach spaces, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 92 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dixmier, J., C*-algebras (North-Holland, 1977).Google Scholar
5.Goodearl, K.. R., Notes on real and complex C*-algebras (Shiva Publishing Ltd. Nantwich, 1982).Google Scholar
6.Helemskii, A. Ya., The Iwmology of Banach and topological algebras (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1986).Google Scholar
7.Helemskii, A. Ya., 31 problems of the homology of the algebras of analysis in Linear complex analysis problem book, Part I, Lecture Notes in Mathematics No. 1573, (Springer-Verlag, 1994), 54–78.Google Scholar
8.Helemskii, A. Ya., The global dimension of a Banach function algebra is different from one, Fund. anal, i pril. 6 (1972), 95–96 = Functional Anal. Appl. 6 (1972), 166–168.Google Scholar
9.Johnson, B. E., Approximate diagonals and cohomology of certain annihilator Banach algebras, Amer. J. Math. 94 (1972), 685–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Johnson, B. E., Cohomology in Banach algebras, Mem. American Math. Soc. 127 (1972).Google Scholar
11.Lykova, Z. A., The lower estimate of the global homological dimension of infinite-dimensional CCR algebras, in Operator algebras and topology (Proceedings of the OATE 2 Conference, Roumania, 1989), Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics, No. 270, (Longman, 1992), 93–129.Google Scholar
12.Pederson, G. K., C*-algebras and their automorphism groups (Academic Press, London, 1979).Google Scholar