Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:51:08.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A CLASS OF EXCHANGE RINGS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

TSIU-KWEN LEE  and
YIQIANG ZHOU
TSIU-KWEN LEE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan. Member of Mathematics Division (Taipei Office), National Center for Theoretical Sciences e-mail: [email protected]
YIQIANG ZHOU*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland A1C 5S7, Canada e-mail: [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is well known that a ring R is an exchange ring iff, for any a ∈ R, a−e ∈ (a2−a)R for some e2 = e ∈ R iff, for any a ∈ R, a−e ∈ R(a2−a) for some e2 = e ∈ R. The paper is devoted to a study of the rings R satisfying the condition that for each a ∈ R, a−e ∈ (a2−a)R for a unique e2 = e ∈ R. This condition is not left–right symmetric. The uniquely clean rings discussed in (W. K. Nicholson and Y. Zhou, Rings in which elements are uniquely the sum of an idempotent and a unit, Glasgow Math. J. 46 (2004), 227–236) satisfy this condition. These rings are characterized as the semi-boolean rings with a restricted commutativity for idempotents, where a ring R is semi-boolean iff R/J(R) is boolean and idempotents lift modulo J(R) (or equivalently, R is an exchange ring for which any non-zero idempotent is not the sum of two units). Various basic properties of these rings are developed, and a number of illustrative examples are given.

Keywords

Primary 16U99
Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 509 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2008

References

REFERENCES

1.Anderson, D. D. and Camillo, V. P., Commutative rings whose elements are a sum of a unit and idempotent, Comm. Algebra 30 (7) (2002), 3327–3336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Ara, P., Extensions of exchange rings, J. Algebra 197 (2) (1997), 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ara, P., Stability properties of exchange rings, International Symposium on Ring Theory, (Kyongju, 1999), 23–42, Trends Math., Birkhaüser Boston, Boston, MA, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ara, P., Goodearl, K. R., O'Meara, K. C. and Pardo, E., Separative cancellation for projective modules over exchange rings, Israel J. Math. 105 (1998), 105–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Camillo, V. P. and Yu, H.-P., Exchange rings, units and idempotents, Comm. Algebra 22 (1994), 4737–4749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Chen, J., Nicholson, W. K. and Zhou, Y., Group rings in which every element is uniquely the sum of a unit and an idempotent, J. Algebra 306 (2) (2006), 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Crawley, P. and Jonsson, B., Refinements for infinite decompositions of algebraic systems, Pacific J. Math. 14 (1964), 797–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Dubrovin, N., Příhoda, P., and Puninski, G., Projective modules over the Gerasimov–Sakhaev counter example, J. Algebra 319 (8) (2008), 3259–3279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Harada, M., Factor categories with applications to direct sum decomposition of modules, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Math. 88, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
10.Lam, T. Y., A crash course on stable range, cancellation, substitution and exchange, J. Algebra Appl. 3 (2004), 301–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Levitzki, J., On the structure of algebraic algebras and related rings, Trans. AMS. 74 (1953), 384–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Mohamed, S. H. and Müller, B. J., Continuous and discrete modules, London Math. Soc. Lectures Note Series 147, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Nicholson, W. K., Lifting idempotents and exchange rings, Trans. AMS. 229 (1977), 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Nicholson, W. K., On exchange rings, Comm. Algebra 25 (6) (1997), 1917–1918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Nicholson, W. K., Strongly clean rings and Fitting's lemma, Comm. Algebra 27 (1999), 3583–3592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Nicholson, W. K. and Zhou, Y., Rings in which elements are uniquely the sum of an idempotent and a unit, Glasgow Math. J. 46 (2004), 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Nicholson, W. K. and Zhou, Y., Strong lifting, J. Algebra 285 (2) (2005), 795–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Nicholson, W. K. and Zhou, Y., Clean general rings, J. Algebra 291 (1) (2005), 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Oshiro, K. and Rizvi, S. T., The exchange property of quasi-continuous modules with the finite exchange property, Osaka J. Math. 33 (1996), 217–234.Google Scholar
20.Pedersen, G. K. and Perera, P., Inverse limits of rings and multiplier rings, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 139 (2005), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Sánchez, E. Campos, On strongly clean rings, 2002 (unpublished).Google Scholar
22.Warfield, R. B. Jr., Exchange rings and decompositions of modules, Math. Ann. 199 (1972), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Zimmermann-Huisgen, B. and Zimmermann, W., Classes of modules with the exchange property, J. Algebra 88 (1984), 416–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar