Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:49:29.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SIMPLICITY CRITERIA FOR RINGS OF DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS

Part of: Rings and algebras arising under various constructions Modules, bimodules and ideals Differential algebra Surfaces and higher-dimensional varieties Local theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2021

V. V. BAVULA
V. V. BAVULA*
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Sheffield, Hicks Building, Sheffield S3 7RH, UK, e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let K be a field of arbitrary characteristic, $${\cal A}$$ be a commutative K-algebra which is a domain of essentially finite type (e.g., the algebra of functions on an irreducible affine algebraic variety), $${a_r}$$ be its Jacobian ideal, and $${\cal D}\left( {\cal A} \right)$$ be the algebra of differential operators on the algebra $${\cal A}$$ . The aim of the paper is to give a simplicity criterion for the algebra $${\cal D}\left( {\cal A} \right)$$ : the algebra $${\cal D}\left( {\cal A} \right)$$ is simple iff $${\cal D}\left( {\cal A} \right)a_r^i{\cal D}\left( {\cal A} \right) = {\cal D}\left( {\cal A} \right)$$ for all i ≥ 1 provided the field K is a perfect field. Furthermore, a simplicity criterion is given for the algebra $${\cal D}\left( R \right)$$ of differential operators on an arbitrary commutative algebra R over an arbitrary field. This gives an answer to an old question to find a simplicity criterion for algebras of differential operators.

MSC classification

Primary: 16D25: Ideals 16S32: Rings of differential operators 16D30: Infinite-dimensional simple rings (except as in ) 13N15: Derivations
Secondary: 13N10: Rings of differential operators and their modules 14J17: Singularities 14B05: Singularities
Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , May 2022 , pp. 347 - 351
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bavula, V. V., Generalized Weyl algebras and their representations, (Russian) Algebra i Analiz , 4(1) (1992), 75–97; translation in St. Petersburg Math. J. 4(1) (1993), 71–92.Google Scholar
Bavula, V. V., Dimension, multiplicity, holonomic modules, and an analogue of the inequality of Bernstein for rings of differential operators in prime characteristic, Represent. Theory, 13 (2009), 182–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavula, V. V., Generators and defining relations for the ring of differential operators on a smooth algebraic variety, Algebras Represent. Theory, 13 (2010), 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavula, V. V., Generators and defining relations for ring of differential operators on smooth algebraic variety in prime characteristic, J. Algebra 323 (2010), 1036–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamarie, M. and Stafford, J. T., When rings of differential operators are maximal orders, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 102 (1987), 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenbud, D., Commutative algebra. With a view toward algebraic geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 150 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995).Google Scholar
Eriksen, E., Differential operators on monomial curves, J. Algebra 264(1) (2003), 186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, J. C. and Robson, J. C., Noncommutative Noetherian rings. With the cooperation of L. W. Small. Revised edition, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 30 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musson, I. M., Some rings of differential operators which are Morita equivalent to the Weyl algebra A 1, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 98(1) (1986), 29–30.Google Scholar
Smith, S. P. and Stafford, J. T., Differential operators on an affine curve. Proc. London Math. Soc. 56(2) (1988), 229–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar