Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:07:44.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why It Is High Time to Reform the Homicide Statutes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Heiko Maas

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Bremen Regional Court is located in a monumental building – the Altes Gerichtshaus (Old Courthouse). A stone slab has adorned its facade since time immemorial. It has been placed directly under the jury courtroom – where the capital crimes come to trial. The inscription on the slab reads: “Thou shalt not kill.” During the National Socialist dictatorship the ruling powers wanted to take down the slab and destroy it. But some citizens of Bremen stopped them. Instead, the commandment against killing was merely covered with a stone slab and not uncovered again until after 1945. The admonition can still be seen today at the Bremen Regional Court. This episode from Bremen's judicial history brings to light three things. First, “Thou shalt not kill” – one of the ten Biblical commandments – is the archetype for all rules associated with human coexistence. Second, the commandment did not suit the agenda of the National Socialists, who perfected the killing of human beings in their extermination camps with industrial means. Third, the people sensed intuitively that rejecting the commandment against killing was a fatal error that would lead to barbarism. That is why they made sure the commandment stayed where it was, even though it became invisible during the Nazi dictatorship.

Type
Speech
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 15 , Issue 6 , 01 October 2014 , pp. 1029 - 1034
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 See Köckert, Matthias, Die zehn Gebote 9 (2007).Google Scholar

2 See Act (Amendment of the Criminal Code) of 4 September 1941, RGBl. I. 549.Google Scholar

3 See Freisler, Roland, Gedanken über das Gesetz zur Änderung des Reichsstrafgesetzbuches, 103 Deutsche Justiz 929, 932 (1941).Google Scholar

4 Mezger, Eduard, Kriminalpolitik auf kriminologischer Grundlage 79 (1934).Google Scholar

5 See Freisler, , supra note 3, at 931. See also Monika Frommel, Die Bedeutung der Tätertypenlehre bei der Entstehung der §§ 211, 212 StGB im Jahr 1941, 29 Juristen Zeitung 559 (1980).Google Scholar

6 Freisler, Roland, Gedanken zur VO gegen Volksschädlinge, 101 Deutsche Justiz 1450, 1451 (1939).Google Scholar

7 See Die Rosenburg. Das Bundesministerium der Justiz und die NS-Vergangenheit (Manfred Görtemaker & Christoph Safferling eds., 2013), available at www.uwk-bmj.de.Google Scholar

8 Wolf, Gerhard, Befreiung des Strafrechts vom nationalsozialistischen Denken?, 36 Juristische Schulung 189, 195 (1996).Google Scholar

9 Jescheck, Hans-Heinrich, Anmerkung zu BGH, 6 Juristen Zeitung 387 (1957).Google Scholar

10 See Rengier, Rudolf, Totschlag oder Mord und Freispruch aussichtslos? Zur Tötung von (schlafenden) Familientyrannen, 23 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 233, 234 (2004).Google Scholar

11 See Decision of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH), 22 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 482 (2003).Google Scholar

12 Based on those released from prison between 2002 and 2010 following a life sentence.Google Scholar

13 Based on those convicted in 2012 of sections 212, 213 of the Criminal Code; including attempts and aiding/abetting.Google Scholar

14 See Fischer, Thomas, § 212, in Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) – Kommentar margin no. 28 (61st ed., 2014).Google Scholar

15 See Grünewald, Anette, Das vorsätzliche Tötungsdelikt 1 (2010).Google Scholar

16 Fischer, , Anmerkung vor §§ 211-212, supra note 14, at margin no. 3.Google Scholar

17 See the proposed legislation by Schleswig-Holstein, BR-Drs. 54/14. On the proposal by the German Bar Association, see Stefan König, Überlegungen zur Reform der Tötungsdelikts-Normen, 50 Recht und Politik 9 (2014).Google Scholar

18 Grünewald, Anette, Zur Abgrenzung von Mord und Totschlag - oder: Die vergessene Reform, 44 Juristische Arbeitsblätter 401 (2012).Google Scholar

19 Eschelbach, Ralf, § 211, in Beck-Online Kommentar zum StGB margin no. 1 (Bernd von Heintschel-Heinegg ed., 3rd ed. 2014).Google Scholar

20 The members of the Commission include: Prof. Dr. Dieter Dölling (Heidelberg), Prof. Dr. Anette Grünewald (Humboldt University of Berlin), Bernhard Jass (Berlin Homicide Squad), Dr. Stefan König und Tanja Brexl (German Bar Association), Prof. Dr. Hans-Ludwig Kröber (Berlin), Prof. Dr. Reinhard Merkel (Hamburg), Martin Reinhard (München), Regina Rieker-Müller, Regional Court presiding judge (Stuttgart), Prof. Dr. Ruth Rissing-van Saan (former Federal Court of Justice presiding judge), Prof. Dr. Christoph Safferling (Marburg), RiAG Dr. Jan Schady, Labour Court Judge (Kiel), BABGH Prof. Dr. Hartmut Schneider, federal prosecutor at the Federal Court of Justice.Google Scholar

21 See police crime statistics of the Federal Criminal Police Office, available at www.bka.de.Google Scholar