Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:12:34.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Walking a Fine Line – A Contextual Perspective on the Purchase of “Stolen” Banking Data by German Authorities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

On 14 February 2008, German prosecutors and investigative authorities made a sensational catch. That day, it became public that they had initiated criminal investigations against Klaus Zumwinkel, then head of the DAX-listed corporation Deutsche Post. Additionally, the top manager's villa in Cologne was searched in a dawn raid and, as the media apparently had been tipped off, TV cameras could film the corporate executive while accompanied out of his home by prosecutor Margit Lichtinghagen. About one year later, Zumwinkel, no longer head of Deutsche Post, was convicted of tax evasion to two years of prison placed on probation. Although hailed by many as a triumph for the prosecution of white-collar crimes and the fight against corporate executives' recklessness, some already questioned the approach of prosecutors and investigators in the early stages. This criticism first and foremost referred to the fact that important information used as evidence in the investigations as well as the subsequent criminal court proceedings stemmed from banking data “stolen” by a Liechtenstein banker from his (former) employer Liechtenstein Global Trust, a bank based in Liechtenstein, and subsequently purchased by German authorities. This phenomenon, the purchase of “stolen banking data by German authorities, was not unprecedented as the so called “Liechtenstein tax affair” (“Liechtensteinische Steueraffäre”) had already been going on for some time. Zumwinkel, however, was the first widely known defendant in that context.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 See for an example, Deutscher Postchef von Polizei aus dem Haus geführt (Deutsche Post chief executive marched off his house by police), Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ, 14 Feb. 2008), available at: www.nzz.ch/aktuell/wirtschaft/uebersicht/ermittlungen-gegen-deutschen-post-chef-zumwinkel-1.670960 (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

2 Bochum, LG, 12 KLs 350 Js 1/08, available at: www.justiz.nrw.de/nrwe/lgs/bochum/lg_bochum/j2009/12_KLs_350_Js_1_08urteil20090126.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

3 Holger Steltzner, Staat, Steuer und Moral (State, taxation and ethics), Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ, 21 Feb. 2008), available at: www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/wirtschaftskriminalitaet-staat-steuer-und-moral-1512742.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013): “defeat for the rule of law” (translation by the author); Schünemann, Bernd, Die Liechtensteiner Steueraffäre als Menetekel des Rechtsstaats (The Liechtenstein tax affair as a warning to the rule of law), 27 Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (NStZ) 305 (2008): “warning to the rule of law” (translation by the author); also see Rudolf Stahl & Ralf Demuth, Strafrechtliches Verwertungsverbot bei Verletzung des Steuergeheimnisses – Ein Zwischenruf im Fall Zumwinkel (Violations of tax secrecy bring along the inadmissibility of evidence - An interjection in the Zumwinkel Case), 47 Deutsches Steuerrecht (DStR) 600 (2008).Google Scholar

4 As to the facts and selected legal aspects of the entire affair, see Ulrich Göres & Jens Kleinert, Die Liechtensteinische Finanzaffäre – Steuer- und steuerstrafrechtliche Konsequenzen (The Liechtenstein financial affair— consequences related to tax and criminal tax law), 62 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 1353 (2008); Sieber, Ulrich, Ermittlungen in Sachen Liechtenstein – Fragen und erste Antworten (Investigations concerning Liechtenstein – preliminary questions and answers), 62 NJW 881 (2008); Kölbel, Ralf, Zur Verwertbarkeit privat-deliktisch beschaffter Bankdaten – Ein Kommentar zur Causa “Kieber” (On the admissibility of banking data obtained in breach of civil law - a commentary on the “Kieber” case), 27 NStZ 241 (2008); Dönch, Uli & Kusitzky, Alexandra, Der Fall Liechtenstein: Strafen, Steuern, Skandale (The Liechtenstein case – penalties, tax and scandals) 14 (22 Feb. 2008, FAZ).Google Scholar

5 Specifically as to the Zumwinkel case and selected legal aspects, see Stahl & Demuth, supra note 3, at 600.Google Scholar

6 Trüg, Gerson, Steuerdaten-CDs und die Verwertung im Strafprozess (CDs containing fiscal data and their admissibility in criminal proceedings), 31 Strafverteidiger (StV) 111, 111–112 (2011): LS-StGB as well as § 17 UWG and § 202a StGB; Michael Pawlik, Zur strafprozessualen Verwertbarkeit rechtswidrig erlangter ausländischer Bankdaten (On the admissibility of banking data illegally obtained abroad), 65 Juristenzeitung (JZ) 693, 694 at fn. 21 (2010): §§ 122–124 and § 131a LS-StGB as well as § 14 BankG in junction with § 63 LS-StGB; Valentin Spernath, Strafbarkeit und zivilrechtliche Nichtigkeit des Ankaufs von Bankdaten (The Purchase of banking data - Criminal liability and invalidity under civil law) 29 NStZ 307, 307–308 (2010): § 17 UWG; Alexander Ignor & Matthias Jahn, Der Staat kann auch anders – Die Schweizer Daten-CDs und das deutsche Strafrecht (That's not all the State can do – Swiss CDs containing banking data and German criminal law), 50 Juristische Schulung (JuS) 390, 391–393 (2010): § 17 UWG; Stahl & Demuth, supra note 3, at 600 (§ 17 UWG); Trüg, Gerson & Habetha, Jörg, Die “Liechtensteiner Steueraffäre” – Strafverfolgung durch Begehung von Straftaten? (The ‘Liechtenstein tax affair’ -Criminal prosecution by the commission of crimes?), 62 NJW 887, 888–889 (2008): § 17 UWG or § 202a StGB; Evelyn Kelnhofer & Björn Krug, Der Fall LGT Liechtenstein – Beweisführung mit Material aus Straftaten im Auftrag des deutschen Fiskus? (The LGT Liechtenstein case – establishing facts through material illegally obtained on behalf of the German Government?), 28 StV 660, 661–662 (2008): §§ 122–124 and § 131a LS-StGB and/or § 17 UWG, § 202a StGB, §§ 43, 44 BDSG; Schünemann, supra note 3, at 308 (§ 124 LS-StGB). As for the respective cases involving Switzerland, see Günter Stratenwerth & Wolfgang Wohlers, Schwarzgeld - Strafbarkeitsrisiken für die Mitarbeiter schweizerischer Banken (Illicit funds - criminal liability risks for employees of Swiss banks), 128 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Strafrecht (ZStR) 429, 438 (2010): Art. 47 CH-BankG; Art. 273 CH-StGB.Google Scholar

7 The last CD was supposedly purchased by Rhineland-Palatinate authorities in spring 2013.Google Scholar

8 As to more details, see again, supra, note 4.Google Scholar

9 As to potential criminal liability risks for Swiss bank employees dealing with the financial assets of foreign tax evaders, see Stratenwerth & Wohlers, supra note 6, at 429, 430436.Google Scholar

10 The income is said to amount to a total of up to 3 billion euro, see Ministry of Finance of North Rhine-Westphalia, Press release, 24 September 2012, available at: www.nrw.de/landesregierung/steuer-cds-sind-das-wirksamste-instrument-gegen-steuerhinterzieher-13449 (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

11 See the corresponding media coverage e.g., Jens Tartler, Welle von Selbstanzeigen nach CD-Kauf (Wave of voluntary declarations after purchase of CD), Financial Times Deutschland (FTD, 15 Aug. 2012), available at: www.ftd.de (last accessed: 27 June 2013); Steuer-CD-Käufe lösen Welle von Selbstanzeigen aus (Purchase of tax CDs causes wave of voluntary declarations), NZZ, 15 Aug. 2012, available at: www.nzz.ch/aktuell/wirtschaft/wirtschaftsnachrichten/steuer-cd-kaeufe-loesen-welle-von-selbstanzeigen-aus-1.17481546 (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

12 Walter-Borjans, quoted from: Ministry of Finance of North Rhine-Westphalia, Press release, supra note 10 (translation by the author).Google Scholar

13 Schäuble kritisiert Ankäufe von Steuer-CDs (Schäuble criticizes purchase of tax CDs), FAZ, 16 Jul. 2012, available at: www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/bankkunden-in-der-schweiz-schaeuble-kritisiert-ankaeufe-von-steuer-cds-11821664.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013; Schäuble: “Zufällige CD-Käufe immer nur eine Behelfskrücke” (Schäuble: “Random purchases of CDs not more than auxiliary instrument”), Die Welt, 127 June 2012, available at: www.welt.de/newsticker/news3/article108299850/Schaeuble-Zufaellige-CD-Kaeufe-immer-nur-eine-Behelfskruecke.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

14 As to the first, see Dietmar Neure, Donata Riedel & Oliver Stock, Wirtschaftsverband wirft NRW-Minister Hehlerei vor (Business association accuses NRW Minister of receiving), Handelsblatt, 24 Aug. 2012, available at: www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/ankauf-von-steuer-cds-wirtschaftsverband-wirft-nrw-minister-hehlerei-vor/7049750.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013), as to the second, see the interview with Rudolf Mellinghoff Steuergerechtigkeit: “Folter kann auch sehr erfolgreich sein” (Fair taxation: “Torture can also be very effective”), SpiegelOnline, 15 March 2013, available at: www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/interview-mit-finanzhof-praesident-mellinghoff-zu-erbschaftsteuer-a-888636.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

15 Marcel, Gyr, Das Geschäft mit den Steuer-CD (The trade with tax CDs), NZZ, 13 Dec. 2012, available at: www.nzz.ch/aktuell/wirtschaft/wirtschaftsnachrichten/das-geschaeft-mit-den-steuer-cd-1.17888569 (last accessed: 27 June 2013); Benz, Matthias, Die Kavallerie wird nicht ausgemustert (The Cavalry is not being discharged), 14 Dec. 2012, NZZ, available at: www.nzz.ch/aktuell/wirtschaft/wirtschaftsnachrichten/die-kavallerie-wird-nicht-ausgemustert-1.17888615 (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

16 See Hassemer, Winfried, Unverfügbares im Strafprozess (The inaccessible in criminal proceedings), in Festschrift für Werner Maihofer 183, 204 (René Bloy, Martin Böse, Thomas Hillenkamp, Carsten Momsen & Peter Rackow eds., 1988) although referring to a different context.Google Scholar

17 As for the major contributions in this respect, see Trüg, supra note 6, at 111, 116–120; Ignor & Jahn, supra note 6, at 390, 394–395; Pawlik, supra note 6, at 693; Stratenwerth & Wohlers, supra note 6, at 436–444; Andreas Schwörer, Schranken grenzüberschreitender Beweisnutzung im Steuer- und Strafverfahren (The Limits to the crossborder use of evidence in fiscal and criminal proceedings), 28 Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Steuerstrafrecht (wistra) 452, 457–458 (2009); Heine, Günter, Beweisverbote und Völkerrecht: Die Affäre Liechtenstein in der Praxis (Inadmissibility of evidence and public international law: The Liechtenstein affair in practice), 10 Online-Zeitschrift für höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung im Strafrecht (HRRS) 540 (2009); Trüg, Gerson & Habetha, Jörg, Beweisverwertung trotz rechtswidriger Beweisgewinnung – insbesondere mit Blick auf die “Liechtensteiner Steueraffäre” (Use of evidence despite of illegal gathering – with a particular view to the “Liechtenstein tax affair”), 27 NStZ 481 (2008); Schünemann, supra note 3, at 305, 309–310; Trüg & Habetha, supra note 6, at 887, 890; Kölbel, supra note 4, at 241; Göres & Kleinert, supra note 4, at 1356–1357; Sieber, supra note 4, at 886; Stahl & Demuth, supra note 3, at 600, 603; Kelnhofer & Krug, supra note 6, at 660, 664667. Finally see Valentin Pfisterer, “Der Reformauftrag betrifft das Steuerrecht” – Lehren aus dem Ankauf, ,gestohlener” Bankdaten und dem Scheitern des deutsch-schweizerischen Steuerabkommens (“The reforming mission concerns the tax law” – Lessons from the purchase of “stolen” banking data and the failure of the German-Swiss tax agreement), 131 ZStR forthcoming (2013).Google Scholar

18 Trüg, supra note 6, at 111, 112–115: § 17 UWG, §27 StGB; §§ 257, 266 StGB; Ignor & Jahn, supra note 6, at 390, 393–394: § 17 UWG, §§ 26, 27 StGB; §§ 257, 266 StGB; Spernath, supra note 6, at 307, 309: § 17 UWG, §§ 26, 27 StGB; Heine, supra note 17, at 540: § 17 UWG; Trüg & Habetha, supra note 17, at 481, 489: § 17 UWG, § 27 StGB and § 257 I StGB; Trüg & Habetha, supra note 6, at 887, 888–890: § 257 I StGB; § 17 UWG, § 27 StGB; Schünemann, supra note 3, at 305, 308 (§ 17 UWG, § 26 StGB and § 261 StGB); Sieber, , supra note 4, at 883–885: § 17 UWG, § 27 StGB; Kelnhofer & Krug, supra note 6, at 660, 662–664: §§ 257, 266 StGB; § 17 UWG; § 44 BDSG.Google Scholar

As to the legal situation from a Swiss perspective, see Stratenwerth & Wohlers, supra note 6, at 429; Vera Delnon & Marcel Niggli, Verkaufen und Kaufen von strafbar erlangten Bankkundendaten durch ausländische Behörden als schweizerisch-deutsches Tatgeschehen (Sale and purchase of illegally obtained banking data by foreign authorities – a Swiss-German crossborder matter), Jusletter, 8 Nov. 2010, available at: www.jusletter.ch (last accessed: 27 June 2013); Eicker, Andreas, Zur Strafbarkeit des Kopierens und Verkaufens sowie des Ankaufens von Bankkundendaten als schweizerisch-deutsches Tatgeschehen (On the culpability of the copying, sale and purchase of banking data – a Swiss-German crossborder matter), Jusletter, 30 Aug. 2010, available at: www.jusletter.ch (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

19 Heine, , supra note 17, at 540, 541; Schünemann, supra note 3, at 305–308; Trüg & Habetha, supra note 17, at 481, 489; Kelnhofer & Krug, supra note 6, at 660, 664665.Google Scholar

20 As to the division of authority principle in general, see Fredrik Roggan & Nils Bergemann, Die “neue Sicherheitsarchitektur” der Bundesrepublik Deutschland – Anti-Terror-Datei, gemeinsame Projektdateien und Terrorismusbekämpfungsergänzungsgesetz (The “new security architecture” of the Federal Republic of Germany – Anti-terror database, shared project files and the law amending the law on the fight against terrorism), 61 NJW 876, 876–877 (2007); Nehm, Kay, Das nachrichtendienstliche Trennungsgebot und die neue Sicherheitsarchitektur (The division of authority principle and the new security architecture), 58 NJW 3289 (2004). Also see the relevant remarks of the BVerfG in its recent decision on the anti-terror database, BVerfG, 1 BvR 1215/07, mn. 123 and 202–203, available at: http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/rs20130424_1bvr121507.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

21 Roggan, & Bergemann, , supra note 20, at 876, 876–877; Nehm, supra note 20, at 3289.Google Scholar

22 Schünemann, supra note 3, at 305–308; Kelnhofer & Krug, supra note 6, at 660, 665.Google Scholar

23 Heine, , supra note 17, at 540, 541–544; Schwörer, supra note 17, at 452, 457; Trüg & Habetha, supra note 6, at 887, 890; Schünemann, supra note 3, at 307; Kelnhofer & Krug, supra note 6, at 660, 666667.Google Scholar

24 Trüg, supra note 6, at 111, 116–118; Heine, supra note 17, at 540, 546; Trüg, & Habetha, supra note 17, at 481, 491; Trüg & Habetha, supra note 6, at 887, 890; Ignor & Jahn, supra note 6, at 390, 394–395; Schünemann, supra note 3, at 309; differentiating Sieber, supra note 4, at 886.Google Scholar

25 Stratenwerth, & Wohlers, , supra note 6, at 429, 441; Göres & Kleinert, supra note 4, at 1357.Google Scholar

26 Pawlik, , supra note 6, at 693, 695–697; Kölbel, supra note 4, at 241, 243–244; Göres & Kleinert, supra note 4, at 1356–1357; Sieber, supra note 4, at 885.Google Scholar

27 Pawlik, , supra note 6, at 693, 694–695; Stratenwerth & Wohlers, supra note 6, at 429, 443444.Google Scholar

28 As far as proceedings in fiscal courts and the admissibility of such evidence in these proceedings are concerned, this is certainly due to the fact that only few respective tax assessment notes have been judicially rescinded, see Joachim Jahn, Kaum Klagen nach Kauf von Steuer-CD (Only few lawsuits after purchase of tax CD), FAZ, 19 Feb. 2013, available at: www.faz.net/aktuell/finanzen/fonds-mehr/zahme-steuersuender-kaum-klagen-nach-kauf-von-steuer-cds-12086241.html. (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

29 BVerfG, 64 NJW 2417 (2010).Google Scholar

30 As to the latter, see LG Bochum, 29 NStZ 352 (2010).Google Scholar

31 Id. at 351.Google Scholar

32 Id. at 351.Google Scholar

33 BVerfG, supra note 29, at 2417.Google Scholar

34 Id. at 2417.Google Scholar

35 See supra, notes 18 through 24.Google Scholar

36 See BVerfG, supra note 29, at 2417.Google Scholar

37 European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, 20 April 1959; Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime, 8 November 1990, available at: www.conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/141.htm (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

38 See BVerfG, supra note 29, at 2417; cf. the argument, see supra note 23.Google Scholar

39 LG Bochum, supra note 30, at 352.Google Scholar

40 See BVerfG, supra note 29, at 2417; cf. the argument, see supra note 19.Google Scholar

41 See Id. at 2417; cf. the argument, see supra note 22.Google Scholar

42 LG Bochum, supra note 30, at 352.Google Scholar

43 See BVerfG, supra note 29, at 2417; cf. the argument, see supra note 18.Google Scholar

44 LG Bochum, supra note 30, at 352.Google Scholar

45 BVerfG, supra note 29, at 2417.Google Scholar

46 Id. at 2418.Google Scholar

47 Id. at 2418–2419.Google Scholar

48 Id. at 2419.Google Scholar

49 Id. at 2419–2420.Google Scholar

50 Id. at 2419.Google Scholar

51 Id. at 2420.Google Scholar

54 Wohlers, Wolfgang, Anmerkung (Annotation), 66 JZ 252 (2011).Google Scholar

55 Supra notes 25 through 27.Google Scholar

56 See, amongst others, Ingo Kaiser, Zulässigkeit des Ankaufs deliktisch erlangter Steuerdaten (Legality of the purchase of illegally obtained tax data), 30 NStZ 383 (2011); Coen, Christoph, Ankauf und Verwertung deliktisch beschaffter Beweismittel in Steuerstrafverfahren aus völkerrechtlicher Sicht (Purchase and use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal tax proceedings – a public international law perspective), 30 NStZ 433 (2011) specifically from a international law perspective.Google Scholar

57 Trüg, Critically, supra note 6, at 111: “Obviously no sound analysis of the relevant issues” (translation by the author).Google Scholar

58 Demuth, Björn, Kein Freibrief für die Strafverfolgung (No licence for the prosecution), Legal Tribune Online, 28 Dec. 2010, available at: www.lto.de/recht/hintergruende/h/bverfg-zu-steuersuender-cds-kein-freibrief-fuer-die-strafverfolgung (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

59 Wohlers, , supra note 54, at 252, 254: “ambiguous impression” (translation by the author).Google Scholar

60 FG Köln, 49 DStR-E 1076 (2011).Google Scholar

61 Id. at 1076–1077.Google Scholar

62 Id. at 1076.Google Scholar

65 Id. at 1076–1077.Google Scholar

67 Id.; cf. the arguments, supra note 25.Google Scholar

68 Id. at 1077.Google Scholar

69 Id. cf. the arguments, supra note 27.Google Scholar

70 Wohlers, , supra note 54, at 252.Google Scholar

71 Leading decisions are e.g. BGH, BGHSt 38, 214 and BGHSt 52, 110. As for a more detailed account, see Lutz Meyer-Goßner, Einl, in Kommentar zur Strafprozessordnung para. 55a (Lutz Meyer-Goßner ed., 55th ed., 2012).Google Scholar

72 Wohlers, , supra note 54, at 252, 253; Trüg & Habetha, supra note 17, at 481, 485486.Google Scholar

73 Wohlers, , supra note 54, at 252, 254.Google Scholar

74 Trüg, supra note 6, at 111, 117118.Google Scholar

75 Klein, Franz, § 370, in Kurzkommentar zur Abgabenordnung para. 2 (Franz Klein ed., 11th ed., 2012).Google Scholar

76 Bilsdorfer, Peter, Die Entwicklung des Steuerstraf- und Steuerordnungswidrigkeitenrechts (The development of the criminal tax law and the law of tax-related administrative offenses), 66 NJW 1413 (2012).Google Scholar

77 BGH, 63 NJW 528 (2009).Google Scholar

78 BGH, 64 NJW 2146 (2010).Google Scholar

79 BGH, 66 NJW 1458 (2012).Google Scholar

80 See supra notes 18 and 25.Google Scholar

81 Klengel, Jürgen & Gans, Tobias, Datenhehlerei – Über die Notwendigkeit eines neuen Straftatbestands (Receiving of data – on the necessity of a new statutory offense), 46 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik (ZRP) 16, 17–19 (2013).Google Scholar

82 Id. at 17–19.Google Scholar

83 Justizministerin will Kauf von Steuer-CDs unter Strafe stellen (Minister of Justice wants to penalize the purchase of tax CDs), Handelsblatt, 1 Sept. 2012, available at: www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/iustizministerin-will-ankauf-von-steuer-cds-bestrafen-schweiz-a-853315.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013); Justizministerin will Ankauf von Steuer-CDs unter Strafe stellen, FTD, 1 Sept. 2012, available at: www.ftd.de/politik/deutschland/:leutheusser-schnarrenberger-justizministerin-will-ankauf-von-steuer-c-ds-unter-strafe-stellen/70084449.html (last accessed: 27June 2013).Google Scholar

84 Klengel, Siehe & Gans, , supra note 81, at 16, 17–19, fn. 19; SPD-Bundestagsfraktion, FDP-Klientelpolitik für kriminelle Reiche (FDP clientelism for rich criminals), Press release, 1 Sept. 2012, available at: www.spdfraktion.de/themen/fdp-klientelpolitik-für-kriminelle-reiche (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

85 Switzerland to adopt OECD standard on administrative assistance in fiscal matters, Federal Department of Finance, Press release, 13 Mar. 2009, available at: www.efd.admin.ch/dokumentation/medieninformationen/00467/index.html?lang=en&msg-id=25863 (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

86 Federal Department of Finance, Strategic directions for Switzerland's financial market policy (16 Dec. 2009), available at: www.efd.admin.ch/dokumentation/zahlen/00578/01622/?lang=en (last accessed: 27 June 2013), at 30 and 49–54; as to the Financial Integrity Strategy, see Monika Roth, Schweiz: Tax Compliance und Weißgeldstrategie (Tax compliance and Financial Integrity Strategy), 7 Risk, Fraud & Compliance 37 (2012).Google Scholar

87 Federal Department of Finance, Report on international financial and tax matters 2012 (January 2012), available at: www.sif.admin.ch/00714/index.html?lang=en (last accessed: 27 June 2013), at 20–23; Federal Department of Finance, Report on Switzerland's financial market policy, 19 December 2012, available at: www.efd.admin.ch/dokumentation/zahlen/00578/02679/index.html?lang=en (last accessed: 27 June 2013), 12–16 & 26–33; Federal Department of Finance, Report on international financial and tax matters 2013, January 2013, available at: www.efd.admin.ch/dokumentation/00737/00782/02690/index.html?lang=en (last accessed: 27 June 2013) at 29–31 and 32–35.Google Scholar

88 Federal Department of Finance, Report on international financial and tax matters 2013, supra note 87, at 32; as to the revised German-Swiss double tax agreement, see Anton-Rudolf Götzenberger, Die neue Steuer-Amtshilfe nach dem DBA Schweiz (The new administrative cooperation in tax matters according to the DTA Switzerland), 66 Betriebsberater (BB) 1954 ff. (2011); as for the text of the protocol, see www.news.admin.ch/NSBSubscriber/message/attachments/20989.pdf (last accessed; 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

89 Switzerland and Germany sign double taxation agreement and declaration on the initiation of negotiations on tax matters, Federal Department of Finance, Press release (27 Oct. 2010), available at: www.efd.admin.ch/dokumentation/medieninformationen/00467/index.html?lang=de&msg-id=35927 (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

90 Abkommen zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft über Zusammenarbeit in den Bereichen Steuern und Finanzmarkt (Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Swiss Confederation on the cooperation in the area of taxation and financial markets), 22 September 2011. The text of the Agreement can be found (in German) at: www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Standardartikel/Themen/Steuern/Internationales_Steuerrecht/Staatenbezogene_Informationen/Laender_A_Z/Schweiz/05-04-2012-abkommen-schweizanl2.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3 (last accessed: 27 June 2013). As for contributions on selected legal aspects of the Agreement, see Matthias Gehm, Das geplante Abkommen über Zusammenarbeit in den Bereichen Steuern und Finanzmarkt zwischen Deutschland und der Schweiz The proposed Agreement on the cooperation in the area of taxation and financial markets between Germany and Switzerland), 45 ZRP 45 (2012); Ebner, Christian & Tobias Ebel/Sebastian Hartrott, Handlungsoptionen des “Schwarzgeldabkommens” zwischen Deutschland und der Schweiz (Courses of action in view of the agreement on illicit funds between Germany and Switzerland), 67 BB 287 (2012); Samson, Erich & Wulf, Martin, Steuerstrafrecht und deutsch-schweizerisches Steuerabkommen (Criminal tax law and the German-Swiss tax agreement), 31 wistra 245 (2012); Joecks, Wolfgang, Das deutschschweizerische Steuerabkommen - verfassungsgemäß? (Is the German-Swiss tax agreement constitutional?), 30 wistra 441 (2011). Finally see Pfisterer, supra note 17.Google Scholar

91 Gehm, , supra note 90, at 45, 46.Google Scholar

92 Id. at 46–47. As to the retroactive taxation in particular, see Ebner, Ebel & Hartrott, supra note 90, at 287, 287290.Google Scholar

93 Ebner, , Ebel & Hartrott, supra note 90, at 287, 287288.Google Scholar

94 Gehm, , supra note 90, at 45, 46.Google Scholar

95 Id. at 47.Google Scholar

96 Id. at 48; Ebner, Ebel & Hartrott, supra note 90, at 287, 293294.Google Scholar

97 Samson, & Wulf, , supra note 90, at 245; Joecks, supra note 90, at 441.Google Scholar

98 Bundestag, , Protocoll of Session No. 17/130, 29 September 2011, available at: dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btp/17/17130.pdf (last accessed: 27 June 2013), at 15274 and 15279; also see, Kritik an Steuerabkommen mit Schweiz lebt wieder auf (Critique of the tax agreement with Switzerland resurges), Reuters Deutschland, 31 May 2012, available at: de.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idDEBEE84U03L20120531 (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

100 Schmid, Ulrich, Peer Steinbrück oder die Lust am Brüskieren (Peer Steinbrück or the lust for the snub), NZZ, 18 March 2009, available at: www.nzz.ch/aktuell/startseite/peer-steinbrueck-oder-die-lust-am-brueskieren-1.2216591 (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

101 Schwarzgeld in der Schweiz: Gabriel wirft Banken bandenmäßige Steuerhinterziehung vor (Illicit funds in Switzerland: Gabriel accuses banks of collaborative tax evasion), SpiegelOnline, 12 Aug. 2012, available at: www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/gabriel-wirft-schweizer-banken-bandenmaessige-steuerhinterziehung-vor-a-849582.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013); Gabriel wirft Schweizer Banken organisierte Kriminalität vor (Gabriel accuses Swiss banks of organized crime), FAZ, 12 Aug. 2012, available at: www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/steuerhinterziehung-gabriel-wirft-schweizer-banken-organisierte-kriminalitaet-vor-11853255.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013)‥Google Scholar

102 Jahn, Joachim, SPD droht Banken mit Lizenzentzug (SPD threatens banks with resumption), FAZ, 27 Dec. 2012, available at: www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/steuerbetrug-spd-droht-banken-mit-lizenzentzug-12007430.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013); Hebel, Christina & Medick, Veit, Kampf gegen Steuerhinterziehung: SPD-Länder drohen Schweizer Banken mit Lizenzentzug Fight against tax evasion: SPD-governed states threaten Swiss banks with resumption), SpiegelOnline, 27 Dec. 2012, available at: www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/spd-laender-wollen-schweizer-steuersuender-banken-lizenz-nehmen-a-874326.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

103 Credit Suisse legt Kundendaten offen (Credit Suisse reveals customer data), Handelsblatt, 13 Nov. 2011, available at: www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/banken/konten-von-us-buergern-credit-suisse-legt-kundendaten-offen/5831634.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013); Streit um Schwarzkonten: Schweizer Banken legen Tausende Daten offen (Controversy on illicit funds: Swiss banks reveal thousands of data records), SpiegelOnline, 1 Feb. 2012, available at: www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/soziales/streit-um-schwarzkonten-schweizer-banken-legen-tausende-daten-oft~en-a-812812.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013);Google Scholar

104 Häfliger, Markus & Schöchli, Hansueli, Bundesrat billigt Facta-Abkommen (Federal Council adopts FACTA Agreement), NZZ, 13 Feb. 2013, available at: www.nzz.ch/aktuell/schweiz/bundesrat-billigt-fatca-abkommen-1.17999556 (last accessed: 27 June 2013); as to FACTA, see Kevin Packman/Maurizio Rivero, The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, 22 Journal of Accountancy, August 2010, available at: www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2010/Aug/20102736.htm (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

105 Häfliger & Schöchli, supra note 104.Google Scholar

106 Amrein, Marcel & Häfliger, Markus, Die «Lex USA» scheitert im Nationalrat (The “lex USA” fails in the National Council), NZZ, 18 June 2013, available at: www.nzz.ch/aktuell/schweiz/lex-usa-scheitert-im-nationalrat-1.18100993 (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

107 Swiss bank Wegelin to pay $58 mln in US tax evasion case, Reuters, 5 Mar. 2013, available at: www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/05/wegelin-sentence-idUSL1N0BWKIK20130305 (last accessed: 27 June 2013); Älteste Schweizer Bank in Amerika verurteilt (Oldest Swiss bank sentenced in America), FAZ, 5 Mar. 2013, available at: www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/unternehmen/wegelin-aelteste-schweizer-bank-in-amerika-verurteilt-12103403.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013); Beihilfe zu Steuerbetrug: US-Gericht verurteilt älteste Schweizer Bank (Assistance in tax evasion: US court convicts oldest Swiss bank), SpiegelOnline, 5 Mar. 2013, available at: www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/schweiz-wegelin-wegen-beihilfe-zur-steuerhinterziehung-verurteilt-a-886880.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

108 Raymond, Nate & Browning, Lynnley, Swiss bank Wegelin to close after guilty plea, Reuters, 4 Jan. 2013, available at: www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/04/us-swissbank-wegelin-idUSBRE9020O020130104 (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar

109 Baumann, Claude, Miami: Das Steuerparadies im Sonnenstaat (Miami: The tax haven in the sunshine state), Handelszeitung, 7 Mar. 2013, available at: www.handelszeitung.ch/politik/miami-das-steuerparadies-im-sonnenstaat (last accessed: 27 June 2013); Baumann, Claude, Deutsche Steuerflüchtlinge: Miami wird die neue Schweiz German tax evaders: Miami turning the new Switzerland), SpiegelOnline, 7 Mar. 2013, available at: www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/soziales/florida-steuerfluechtlinge-aus-der-schweiz-fliehen-in-die-usa-a-887381.html (last accessed: 27 June 2013).Google Scholar