1 Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft (1988)Google Scholar

2 Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft (1990)Google Scholar

3 Das Recht der Gesellschaft (1993)Google Scholar

4 Die Politik der Gesellschaft (2000, published posthumously).Google Scholar

5 Die Religion der Gesellschaft (2000, published posthumously).Google Scholar

6 Published in 1997.Google Scholar

7 See e.g. Federal Constitutional Court judge Udo di Fabio, Luhmann im Recht – Die juristische Rezeption soziologischer Betrachtung, in Niklas Luhmanns Denken. Interdisziplinäre Einflüsse und Wirkungen (Helga Gripp-Hagelstange ed. 2000), 139.Google Scholar

8 Niklas Luhmann, Law as a Social System (K. Ziegert transl., Kastner, Nobles, Schiff, R. Ziegert eds., 2004), see also the book review by Peer Zumbansen in 15 Social and Legal Studies 453 (2006), available here (listing many of Luhmann's monographs published in the English language).Google Scholar

9 Gunther Teubner, Law as an Autopoietic System (1993).Google Scholar

10 See e.g. note 108 on the beach as a social system, note 411 explaining non-verbal communication by reference to an interview with soccer player Preetz, Michael, and note 902 referring to Max Weber's dire existence in the footnotes of legal theory.Google Scholar

11 Heinz von Foerster, Observing Systems (1982)Google Scholar

12 George Spencer-Brown, Laws of Form (1969)Google Scholar

13 See further Niklas Luhmann, Tautology and Paradox in the Self-Description of Modern Society, 6 Sociological Theory 26, 33-4 (1988).Google Scholar

14 Derrida, Jacques, Force of Law: The mythical foundations of authority, 11 Cardozo L. Rev. 909 (1990).Google Scholar

15 See further Jean-François Lyotard, La condition postmoderne: rapport sur le Savoir (1985)Google Scholar

16 See further Schlag, Pierre, Hiding the Ball, 71 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 1681 (1996)Google Scholar

17 Teubner, Gunther, Dealing with Paradoxes of Law: Derrida, Luhmann, Wiethölter, in: On Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in Law (Oren Perez and Gunther Teubner eds., 2006), 41-64Google Scholar

18 For a recent attempt see Kjaer, Poul, Systems in Context. On the Outcome of the Habermas/Luhmann-Debate, Ancilla Juris 2006, 66, available at http://www.anci.ch/doku.php?id=beitrag:systems.Google Scholar

19 See most notably Teubner, Gunther, Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law, 17 Law and Society Review 239, 244 (1983).Google Scholar

20 Kennedy, David, Autumn Weekends: An Essay on Law and Everyday Life, in: Law in Everyday Life (Austin Sarat & Thomas R. Kearns eds., 1993), 191-235Google Scholar