Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T01:36:15.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tax Amnesty 2004/2005 – An Appropriate Revenue Tool?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Martin Kellner

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Tax evasion is punishable. However, by tax amnesty the state waives punishment and gives tax dodgers the chance to return to honesty. The “Act To Promote Tax Honesty” offers people who evaded taxes between the years 1993 and 2002 an opportunity to wipe the slate clean by declaring their concealed income up to 2005. This offer applies to income tax, corporate tax, turnover tax, wealth tax, trade tax, inheritance tax, gift tax and tax deductions pursuant to the Einkommensteuergesetz (Income Tax Act). Amnesty participants must pay a reduced tax rate of 25 percent on declared income within ten days after the declaration. For income and corporate tax the assessment basis is reduced to 60 percent. Thereby the new law grants the repentant tax evaders a tax rate of 15 percent rather then usual up to 48 percent on the profits they gained in the past ten years.

Type
Public Law
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , 01 March 2004 , pp. 339 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Steuerhinterziehung, § 370 Abgabenordnung.Google Scholar

2 Gesetz zur Förderung der Steuerehrlichkeit, Dec. 23, 2003, BGBl. I, 2928.Google Scholar

3 See for more details Peter Bilsdorfer, NJW 57, 321 (2004); Karsten Randt & Jörg Schauf, DStR 41, 1369 (2003); and the “Merkblatt zur Anwendung des Gesetzes über die strafbefreiende Erklärung,” available at http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de.Google Scholar

4 The so-called “Generalpardon”, § 68 Wehrbeitragsgesetz, RGBl. 1913, 505.Google Scholar

5 See, Sebastian Düll, Verfassungsrechtliche Voraussetzungen einer Steueramnestie im Rahmen der Neuordnung der Zinsbesteuerung 28 (2003).Google Scholar

6 Gesetz über die strafbefreiende Erklärung von Einkünften aus Kapitalvermögen und von Kapitalvermögen, 25 July 1988, BGBl. I, 1093.Google Scholar

7 Article 60 para. 2 GG.Google Scholar

8 Herzog, Roman, in Grundgesetz, Feb., 2003, Article 60 note 33 (Theodor Maunz & Günter Dürig eds.).Google Scholar

9 BVerfGE 25, 352 (358).Google Scholar

10 Id. at 360-361.Google Scholar

11 BVerfGE 2, 213 (219); Roman Herzog, supra note 8, at Article 60 note 32.Google Scholar

12 Selbstanzeige, § 371 Abgabenordnung.Google Scholar

13 Seer, Roman, in Klaus Tipke & Joachim Lang (eds.), Steuerrecht § 23 note 55 (17th ed. 2002).Google Scholar

14 See, Seer, Roman, supra note 13, at § 23 note 55; Klaus Tipke, Die Steuerrechtsordnung 1439 (Vol. III 1993).Google Scholar

15 See, Düll, Sebastian, supra note 5, at 32-33.Google Scholar

16 BVerfGE 2, 213 (222); Detlef Merten, Rechtsstaatlichkeit und Gnade 13 (1978).Google Scholar

17 See, Wieland, Joachim, Für eine bessere Steuerrechtskultur (unpublished lecture at the 1st Deutscher Finanzgerichtstag in Cologne, 26 January 2004).Google Scholar

18 Articles 74 para. 1 no. 1, 72 para. 2; see, BVerfGE 2, 213 (222); 10, 234 (238).Google Scholar

19 BVerfGE 10, 234 (241-242).Google Scholar

20 E.g., BVerfGE 84, 233 (238); Bernd Schünemann, StVj 1, 6 (1989).Google Scholar

21 BVerfGE 10, 238 (241); see, Detlef Merten, supra note 16, at 16-17; Uwe Wesel, Geschichte des Rechts 566-569 (2nd ed. 2001).Google Scholar

22 See, Limbach, Jutta, DtZ 4, 66 (1993); this discussion resumes regularly on annuals, e.g., Uwe Wesel, Die Zeit, 6 Jan. 1995, 3; Friedrich Schorlemmer & Joachim Gauck, DRiZ 77 88-90 (1999).Google Scholar

23 See, Arndt, Hans-Wolfgang, in Veranlagung – Abgeltung – Steuerfreiheit, Besteuerung von Kapitalerträgen im Rechtsstaat 55, 57 (Gerhard Schick ed., 2003); Sebastian Düll, supra note 5, at 36-37; Detlef Merten, supra note 16, at 27.Google Scholar

24 Arndt, Hans-Wolfgang, supra note 23, at 55-57; Sebastian Düll, supra note 5, at 36-37; Detlef Merten, supra note 16, at 27; Bernd Schünemann, ZRP 17, 137-138 (1984); StVj 1, 3, 25 (1989); ZRP 36, 433-437 (2003).Google Scholar

25 Schünemann, Bernd, ZRP 17, 137-138 (1984); StVj 1, 3, 25 (1989); ZRP 36, 433, 438 (2003).Google Scholar

26 See, Joachim Wieland, supra note 17.Google Scholar

27 BVerfGE 1, 14 (52); 83, 1 (23); 89, 132 (141).Google Scholar

28 BVerfGE 84, 233 (238); skeptically: Bernd Schünemann, ZRP 36, 433-436 (2003).Google Scholar

29 Arndt, Hans-Wolfgang, supra note 23, at 55-59; Lars P. Feld, in Veranlagung – Abgeltung -Steuerfreiheit, Besteuerung von Kapitalerträgen im Rechtsstaat 43-45 (Gerhard Schick ed., 2003); Klaus Tipke, supra note 14, at 1439.Google Scholar

30 See, Joecks, Wolfgang, DStR 41, 1417-1418 (2003).Google Scholar

31 See, the report on the poor success in the first weeks of Tax Amnesty 2004/2005 Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 23 Feb 2004, 9.Google Scholar