¹ Press Release, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Myanmar: UN Expert Raises Alarm on Rakhine State, U.N. Press Release (Apr. 7, 2014), http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=14476&LangID=E.Google Scholar

² Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Myanmar, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Myanmar, Human Rights Council, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/25/64 (Apr. 2, 2014) (by Tomás Ojea Quintana), http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session25/Pages/ListReports.aspx.Google Scholar

³ Id. at 13.Google Scholar

⁴ Tansubhapol, Thanida, Surapong Renews Case for ICC Intervention in Clashes, Bangkok Post, Nov. 8, 2012; see also Achara Ashayagachat, Rally Will Be Litmus Test for Both Sides, Bangkok Post, Apr. 17, 2014.Google Scholar

⁵ Thailand signed the Rome Statute on 2 October 2000, but has not yet ratified it.Google Scholar

⁶ According to Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute, a State which is not a Party to the Statute “may, by declaration lodged with the Registrar, accept the exercise of jurisdiction by the Court.” Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court art. 12, para. 3, July 17, 1993, 2187 U.N.T.S. 3 [hereinafter Rome Statute].Google Scholar

⁷ Indonesia; Religious Minorities Targets of Rising Violence, Hum. Rts. Watch, Feb. 28, 2013, http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/02/2S/indanesia-religious-minorities-targets-rising-violence.Google Scholar

⁸ See McDonald, Mark, Teachers Being Targeted and Murdered in Thailand, N.Y. Times, Dec. 16, 2012; see also Bomb Kills Three Policemen in Thai South, NewStraitsTimes, Apr. 26, 2014, http://cached.newslookup.com/cached.php?ref_id=433&siteid=2354&id=5818638&t=1398488301.Google Scholar

⁹ For the referral mechanisms under the Rome Statute, see infra Part C.II.1.Google Scholar

¹⁰ The ten Member States of ASEAN are: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam.Google Scholar

¹¹ The Special Panels were set up by the United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET). U.N. Transitional Administration in Timor, East, On the Establishment of Panels with Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Serious Criminal Offences, Regulation No. 2000/15 (June 6, 2000), http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/past/etimor/untaetR/Reg0015E.pdf.Google Scholar

¹² Id. at § 22.1.Google Scholar

¹³ Id. at § 1.3.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Freeland, Steven, International Criminal Justice in the Asia-Pacific Region: The Role of the International Criminal Court Treaty Regime, 11 J. Int'l Crim. Just. 1029, 1043 (2013).Google Scholar

¹⁵ See Introduction to the ECCC, Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, http://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/about-eccc/introduction.Google Scholar

¹⁶ G.A. Res. 57/228, Khmer Rouge Trials, U.N. Doc. A/RES/57/228 B (22 May 2003) [hereinafter ECCC Agreement], http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Cam%20ARES%2057%20228B.pdf.Google Scholar

¹⁷ ECCC Agreement art. 3(2)(a).Google Scholar

¹⁸ ECCC Agreement art. 9.Google Scholar

¹⁹ For the proceedings against Kaing Guek Eav, see Kaing Guek Eav: Biography, Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, http://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/indicted-person/kaing-guek-eav; for proceedings against Nuan Chea, see Nuon Chea: Biography, Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, http://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/indicted-person/nuori-chea.Google Scholar

²⁰ UN Voices Concern as Second Judge Resigns from Cambodia Genocide Court, U.N. News Centre (Mar. 19, 2012), http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=41578&Cr=Cambodia&Cr1=#.U2ckl6LBeDY; see also Joe Freeman, Pauw, Pestman and Ianuzzi Leave Khmer Rouge Court “Farce” Behind, The Phonm Phen Post (Dec. 21, 2012), http://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/pauw-pestmari-and-ianuzzi-leave-khmer-rouge-court-farce-behind.Google Scholar

²¹ Sperfeldt, Christoph, From the Margins of internationalized Criminal Justice: Lessons Learned at the Extraordinary Chambers of Cambodia, 11 J. Int'l Crim. Just., 1111, 1136 (2013); see also Suzannah Linton, Putting Cambodia's Extraordinary Chambers into Context, 11 Singapore Year Book of Int'l Law 195, 256 (2007) (“Disturbingly substandard as it is, this form of court was the best that could be agreed upon.”).Google Scholar

²² United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, Rome, It., June 15-July 17, 1998, Summary Records of the Plenary Meetings and of the Meetings of the Committee of the Whole, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.183/13 (Vol. II), 106 [hereinafter Rome Conference] (statement of Somboon Sangiambut, Head of the Thailand Delegation), http://legal.un.org/icc/rome/praceedings/E/Rome%20Proceedings_v2_e.pdf.Google Scholar

²³ On 11 June 2010, the Assembly of States Parties, on its review conference in Kampala, Uganda, adopted amendments of the Rome Statute on the definition of the crime of aggression. However, the Court will not exercise its jurisdiction before 1 January 2017. For the amendments, see Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Kampala, Uganda, May 31-June 11, 2010, ICC Doc. RC/9/11 (2010).Google Scholar

²⁴ For all current situations and cases, see Situations and Cases, International Criminal Court, http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situatians%20and%20cases/Pages/situations%20and%20cases.aspx.Google Scholar

²⁵ Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyllo, Case No. ICC 01/04-01/06, Judgment (Mar. 14, 2012), http://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/doc1379838.pdf; Prosecutor v. Mathieu Ngudjala Chui?, Case No. ICC-01/04-02/12, Judgment (Dec. 18, 2012), http://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/dac1579080.pdf; Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/07 (Mar. 7, 2014), http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/situation%20icc%200104/related%20cases/icc%200104%200107/Pages/democratic%20republic%20of%20the%20congo.aspx.Google Scholar

²⁶ See Akhavan, Payam, The Rise, and Fall, and Rise, of International Criminal Justice, 11 J. Int'l Crim. Just. 527, 527–536 (2013); Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Ambiguities and Lacunae: The International Criminal Court Ten Years On, 11 J. Int'l Crim. Just. 553, 553-561 (2013); Isanga, Joseph M., The International Criminal Court Ten Years Later: Appraisal and Prospects, 21 Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L. 235, 235-323 (2013); Schabas, William A., The International Criminal Court at Ten, 22 Crim. L.F., 493, 493-509 (2011).Google Scholar

²⁷ Schabas, William A., The Banality of International Justice, 11 J. Int'l Crim. Just. 545, 545-551 (2013); Struett, Michael J., Why the International Criminal Court Must Pretend to Ignore Politics, 26 Ethics & Int'L Aff. 83, 33-92 (2012).Google Scholar

²⁸ See, e.g., Kapur, Amrita, Asian Values v. The Paper Tiger: Dismantling the Threat to Asian Values Posed by the International Criminal Court, 11 J. Int'l Crim. Just. 1059, 1087 (2013). For a review of the ICC's practice in this regard, see Daniel Nsereko, The ICC and Complementarity in Practice, 26 Leiden J. Int'l L., 427, 427-447 (2013).Google Scholar

²⁹ See Symposium, , Justice for All? Ten Years of the International Criminal Court in the Asia-Pacific Region, 11 J. Int'l Crim. Just. 1023, 1023-1137 (2013).Google Scholar

³⁰ Cambodia signed the Rome Statute on 23 October 2000 and deposited its instrument of ratification on 11 April 2002.Google Scholar

³¹ The Philippines signed the Rome Statute on 28 December 2000.Google Scholar

³² In November 2012, a Government panel that was set up in 1999 in order to consider ratification of the ICC Statute had been revived but did not reach a consensus. See Thanida Tansubhapal & King-Oua Laohong, Panel Revived to Mull ICC Cover, Bangkok Post (Nov. 30, 2012).Google Scholar

³³ United Nations Regional Groups of Member States, Dep't for Gen. Assembly & Conf. Mgmt., http://www.un.org/depts/DGACM/RegionalGroups.shtml (last modified May 9, 2014).Google Scholar

³⁴ Rome Conference, supra note 22, at 73 (statement of Muladi, Head of the Indonesia delegation).Google Scholar

³⁵ Id. at 111 (statement of Nguyen Ba Son, Head of the Vietnam delegation).Google Scholar

³⁶ Id. at 91 (statement of Pengiran Maidin Pengiran Haji Hashim, Head of the Brunei Darussalam delegation).Google Scholar

³⁷ Id. at 200 (statement of Arizal Effendi, Deputy Head of the Indonesia delegation).Google Scholar

³⁸ Id. at 109 (statement of R. Vengadesan, Head of the Malaysia delegation).Google Scholar

³⁹ Id. at 308 (statement of Nguyen Ba Son, Head of the Vietnam delegation).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Id. at 82 (statement of Lauro L. Baja, Jr., Head of the Philippines delegation).Google Scholar

⁴¹ Id. at 199 (statement of Piyawat Niyomrerks, Deputy Director-General, Dep't of Treaties and Legal Affairs, Thai Ministry of Foreign Affairs).Google Scholar

⁴² Thanarajasingam, S., Deputy Permanent Representative of Malaysia, Statement on Agenda Item 142 (Nov. 1, 1995), http://www.iccnow.org/documents/Malaysia1PrepCmt1Nov95.pdf.Google Scholar

⁴³ Rome Conference, supra note 22, at 73 (statement of Muladi, Head of the Indonesia delegation).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Id. at 337–38 (statement of Arizal Effendi, Deputy Head of the Indonesia delegation).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Id. at 81–82 (statement of Lionel Yee, Deputy Head of the Singapore delegation).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Id. at 124 (statement of Lionel Yee, Deputy Head of Singapore delegation).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Id. at 109 (statement of R. Vengadesan, Head of the Malaysia delegation).Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Id. at 287 (statement of Pham Truong Giang, First Secretary, Vietnam Permanent Mission).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Id. at 106-07 (statement of Somboon Sangiambut, Head of the Thailand Delegation).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Bangladesh joined on 23 March 2010, the Philippines on 30 August 2011, the Maldives on 21 September 2011, Vanuatu on 2 December 2011, and Palestine on 2 January 2015. See Asia Pacific States, Int'l Crim. Ct., http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/asian%20states/Pages/asian%20states.aspx.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Kapur, , supra note 28, at 1061; Song, Sang-Hyun, Preventive Potential of the International Criminal Court, 3 Asian J. Int'l L., 203, 212 (2013).Google Scholar

⁵² See U.N. Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, National Plans of Action for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/lssues/PlansActions/Pages/PlansofActionIndex.aspx.Google Scholar

⁵³ U.N. Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Indonesia, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/21/7, 14-22 (July 5, 2012), http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A-HRC-21-7_en.pdf.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Saragih, Bagus B.T., Denny to leave for The Hague for Study on Rome Statute, Jakarta Post (Mar. 4, 2013).Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Id. Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Don't Worry, We Don't Look Back: ICC President Ensures, Jakarta Post (Dec. 18, 2013). According to Article 11(1), the Court has jurisdiction ratione ternporis only with respect to crimes committed after the entry into force of the Statute; Article 11(2) further provides that the Court may exercise its jurisdiction only with respect to crimes committed after the entry into force of the Statute for each respective state; additionally, according to Article 124, a State may declare that, for a period of seven years after the entry into force of the Statute for the State concerned, it does not accept the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to war crimes when a crime is alleged to have been committed by its nationals or on its territory. See Rome Statute, supra note 6, art. 12, para. 3.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Saragih, , supra note 54, at para. 11.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Sihaloho, Markus Junianto, Defense Minister Dodges Question on Blocking ICC Treaty's Ratification, Jakarta Globe (May 21, 2013), http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/defense-minister-dodges-question-on-blocking-icc-treatys-ratification/.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ See Human Rights Resource Centre (HRRC), The Institute for Policy Research and Advocacy (ELSAM) & Indonesian Coalition for the International Criminal Court (CICC), Progress Report: Indonesia Efforts to Ratify the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 7 (Dec. 14, 2012), http://www.elsam.or.id/downloads/1357181136_Bahan_Untuk_Diplomatic_Briefing_14_Des_2012.pdf.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Press Release, Coalition for the International Criminal Court (CICC), Laos: Acceding to Rome Statute Is in Line with Commitment to Rule of Law (Sept. 27, 2013), http://www.iccnow.org/documents/CICC_PR_URC_Laos_ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

⁶¹ For an early assessment, see Toon, Valeriane, Internationa! Criminal Court: Reservations of Non-State Parties in Southeast Asia, 26 Contemp. Southesast Asia, 218, 224 (2004).Google Scholar

⁶² See Coalition for the International Criminal Court, Country Factsheet Malaysia, http://www.iccnow.org/?mad=cau ntry&iduct=106.Google Scholar

⁶³ Id. Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Carvalho, Martin, Nazri: Moves to Accede to Rome Statute of International Criminal Court, Star Online (June 12, 2012), http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Natian/2012/06/12/Nairi-Moves-to-accede-to-Rome-Statute-of-International-Criminal-Court/.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Tansubhapol, & Laohang, , supra note 32.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Id. Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Id. Google Scholar

⁶⁸ See Press Release, CICC, supra note 60, at 1.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Southeast Asian countries may consider Australia's and New Zealand's experiences with regard to the adjustment of their domestic legal systems. See Boas, Gideon, An Overview of Implementation by Australia of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2 J. Int'lCrim. Just. 179 (2004); Juliet, Hay, Implementing the ICC Statute in New Zealand, 2 J, Int'l. Crim. Just. 191 (2004).Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Charter pmbl., para. 7, http://www.asean.org/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf.Google Scholar

⁷¹ See Gillian, Goh, The “ASEAN Way,” Non-Intervention and ASEAN's Role in Conflict Management, 3 Stan. J. E. Asian Aff. 113 (2003).Google Scholar

⁷² Brunei Darussalam joined in 1984, Vietnam in 1995, Laos and Myanmar in 1997, and Cambodia in 1999. Overview, Association or Southeast Asian Nations, http://www.asean.org/asean/about-asean/overview (last visited Feb. 13, 2015). In 2011, Timor-Leste submitted an application to become the eleventh member of ASEAN. Press Release, ASEAN Secretariat News, Timor-Leste Remains Committed to Join ASEAN (Nov. 4, 2014), http://www.asean.org/news/asean-secretariat-news/item/timor-leste-remains-committed-to-join-asean. Timor-Leste ratified the Rome Statute in 2002. Timor-Leste, Int'l Crim. Ct., http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/asp/states%20parties/asian%20states/Pages/timor%20leste.aspx.Google Scholar

⁷³ The Asean Declaration (Bangkok Declaration), §§ 1-2, Aug. 8, 1967, 6 I.L.M. 1223, available at http://www.asean.org/news/item/the-asean-declaration-bangkok-declaration.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Id. at pmbl., para. 4.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Kapur, , supra note 28, at 1063; Nasu, Hitoshi, Revisiting the Principle of Non-Intervention: A Structural Principle of international Law or a Political Obstacle to Regional Security in Asia?, 3 Asian J. Int'l L., 25, 46 (2013).Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Nasu, , supra note 75, at 36. The ASEAN principles are particularly being expressed when faced or challenged by the views of other states or organizations. Goh, supra note 71, at 115.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Goh, , supra note 71, at 114; Nasu, , supra note 75, at 36.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia, art. 2, Feb. 24, 1976, 27 I.L.M. 610, available at http://www.asean.org/news/item/treaty-of-amity-and-cooperation-in-southeast-asia-indonesia-24-february-1976-3. These principles have been reiterated by the ASEAN Bali Concords II (2003) and III (2011).Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Kapur, , supra note 28, at 1074; Nasu, , supra note 75, at 36; Simon, Sheldon, ASEAN and Multilateralism: The Long, Bumpy Road to Community, 30 Contemp. Southeast Asia, 264, 269 (2008). After Vietnamese troops entered Cambodia in 1978, ASEAN called for the withdrawal of all foreign troops from Cambodia. Goh, supra note 71, at 117.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Nasu, , supra note 75, at 36.Google Scholar

⁸¹ G.A. Res. 25/2625, U.N. Doc. A/RES/25/2625 (Oct. 24, 1970), http://www.un-documents.net/a25r2625.htm.Google Scholar

⁸² Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicar. v. U.S.), 1986 I.C.J. 14, ¶ 108 (June 27).Google Scholar

⁸³ For an analysis of this development, see Hiro Katsumata, Why is ASEAN Diplomacy Changing? From “Non-Interference” to “Open and Frank Discussions,” 44 Asian Surv. 237 (2004).Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Nasu, , supra note 75, at 38; Thayer, Carlyle A., Re-inventing ASEAN: From Constructive Engagement to Flexible Intervention, 3 Harv. Asia Pac. Rev. 67, 70 (1999).Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Nasu, , supra note 75, at 39.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Goh, , supra note 71, at 118.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ See Nasu, supra note 75, at 41.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ By the end of the year 2015, the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC)—envisaged as ASEAN's most integrated pillar—shall be achieved.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ ASEAN Charter pmbl. para. 7.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Desierto, Diane A., Universalizing Core Human Rights in the “New” ASEAN: A Reassessment of Culture and Development Justifications Against the Global Rejection of Impunity, 1 Göttingen J. Int'l L. 77, 92 (2009).Google Scholar

⁹¹ Id. at 91.Google Scholar

⁹² ASEAN Should Voice Concern Over Thai Coup: Natalegawa, Globalpost (May 23, 2014, 8:33 AM), http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/kyodo-news-international/140523/asean-should-voice-concern-over-thai-coup-natalegawa-D.Google Scholar

⁹³ Id. Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Pandey, Umesh, Achara Ashayagachat & Thanida Tansubhapol, World Leaders: Return Democracy, Bangkok Post (May 24, 2014).Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Id. Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Philippines House Resolution No 1175: Grave Concern Over Thai Military Coup, ASEAN Parliamentarians for Hum. Rts. (May 28, 2014), http://www.aseanmp.org/?p=3081.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Id. Google Scholar

⁹⁸ In its “Statement of ASEAN Foreign Ministers on the Recent Developments in the Rakhine State, Myanmar” (August 17, 2012), ASEAN “welcomed the steps the Government of Myanmar has taken to address the domestic issue”, http://www.asean.org/images/archive/documents/Statement%20of%20ASEAN%20FM%20on%20Recent%20Developments%20m%20the%20Rakhine%20State.pdf.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Myanmar's New Challenges, Bangkok Post (May 5, 2014, 9:42 AM), http://www.bangkokpost.com/most-recent/408178/myanmar-day-in-the-sun-overshadawed-by-new-challenges.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ Nasu, , supra note 75, at 46.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Statement on the Developments in Thailand, Ass'n of Southeast Asian Nations (May 11, 2014), http://www.asean.org/news/asean-statement-cammuniques/item/asean-foreign-ministers-statement-on-the-developments-in-thailand?category_id=26.Google Scholar

¹⁰² Statute, Rome, supra note 6, art. 12(2)(a)–(b).Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Id. art. 13(1).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Id. art. 13(2).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Kapur, , supra note 28, at 1078.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ This has been criticized by Human Rights Watch. See UN Security Council: Address Inconsistency in ICC Referrals, Hum. Rts. Watch (Oct. 16, 2012), http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/10/16/un-security-council-address-inconsistency-icc-referrals-0.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ See Kapur, , supra note 28, at 1078.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Simmons, Beth A. & Danner, Allison, Credible Commitments and the International Criminal Court, 64 Int'l Org. 225, 244 (2010).Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Statute, Rome, supra note 6, art. 17(1)(b).Google Scholar

¹¹¹ Id. art. 17(3).Google Scholar

¹¹² The Office of the Prosecutor, Report on Preliminary Examination Activities 2013, Int'l Crim. Ct. (Nov. 2013), http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/press%20and%20media/press%20releases/Documents/OTP%20Preliminary%20Examinations/OTP%20-%20Report%20%20Preliminary%20Examination%20Activities%202013.pdf.Google Scholar

¹¹³ Id. at para. 124.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ For details about the investigation, see id. at para. 130.Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ For further citations, see Kapur, supra note 28, at 10S7.Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ Id. at 1087.Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ Freeland, supra note 14, at 1050.Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Office of the Prosecutor, Report on Prosecutorial Strategy, Int'l Crim. Ct., 5 (Sept. 14, 2006), http://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/D673DD8C-D427-4547-BC69-2D363E07274B/143708/ProsecutorialStrategy20060914_English.pdf.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Office of the Prosecutor, Strategic Plan: June 2012-2015, Int'l Crim. Ct., 29 (Oct. 11, 2013), http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/structure%20of%20the%20court/office%20of%20the%20prosecutor/policies%20and%20strategies/Documents/OTP-Strategic-Plan-2012-2015.pdf.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Freeland, supra note 14, at 50.Google Scholar

¹²¹ Establishing the Ad Hoc Human Rights Court, Law No. 26, arts. 8, 9, 42 (2000), 208 State Gazette 23 (Indon.). For the criticism surrounding this law, see Kapur, supra note 28, at 1072.Google Scholar

¹²² Laws of Malaysia, Act A1430, Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2012, § 107, http://54.251.120.208/doc/laws/Act_A1430_Penal_Code_(amendment).pdf.Google Scholar

¹²³ See Toon, supra note 61, at 225.Google Scholar

¹²⁴ In the case of Malaysia, see Coalition for the International Criminal Court, supra note 62.Google Scholar

¹²⁵ Lionel Yee, Deputy Head of Singapore delegation, Rome Conference, 82.Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Statute, Rome, supra note 6, pmbl., paras. 3–4.Google Scholar

¹²⁷ William Theodore de Bary, Asian Values and Human Rights: A Confucian Communitarian Perspective (2000); Fukuyama, Francis, Confucianism and Democracy, 6 J. Democracy 20 (1995), http://www.u.arizona.edu/~zshipley/pol437/docs/fukuyama_1995.pdf; Kim, So Young, Do Asian Values Exist? Empirical Tests of the Four Dimensions of Asian Values, 10 J. E. Asian Stud. 315 (2010); Kapur, , supra note 28; Herman Joseph S. Kraft, Human Rights, ASEAN and Constructivism; Revisiting the “Asian Values” Discourse, 22 Philippine Pol. Sci. J. 33 (2001); Welzel, Christian, The Asian Values Thesis Revisited: Evidence from the World Values Surveys, 12 Japanese]. Pol. Sci. 1 (2011).Google Scholar

¹²⁸ For a deeper analysis of the Asian values debate and its impact on international criminal law, see Kapur, supra note 28, at 1064.Google Scholar

¹²⁹ Chimni, B.S., Asian Civilizations and International Law: Some Reflections, 1 Asian J. Int'l L. 39, 41 (2011).Google Scholar

¹³⁰ Kim, , supra note 127, at 338; Welzel, , supra note 127, at 29.Google Scholar

¹³¹ Ginbar, Yuval, Human Rights in ASEAN—Setting Sail or Treading Water?, 10 Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 504, 506 (2010).Google Scholar

¹³² ASEAN Charter pmbl., para. 8.Google Scholar

¹³³ Id. art. 14.Google Scholar

¹³⁴ Id. art 1(7).Google Scholar

¹³⁵ ASEAN Human Rights Declaration § 7, http://www.asean.org/news/asean-statement-communiques/item/asean-human-rights-declaration.Google Scholar

¹³⁶ Robertson, Phil, Betraying Human Rights, ASEAN Style, Nation (May 14, 2012, 1:00 AM), http://www.nationmultimedia.com/opinian/Betraying-human-rights-ASEAN-stvle-30181860.html.Google Scholar

¹³⁷ Pillay Encourages ASEAN to Ensure Human Rights Declaration is Implemented in Accordance with International Obligations, Office High Commissioner for Hum. Rts. (Nov. 19, 2012), http://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=12809&LangID=E.Google Scholar

¹³⁸ Ginbar, , supra note 131, at 506.Google Scholar

¹³⁹ Joint Communique of the Twenty-Sixth ASEAN Ministerial Meeting Singapore, 23-24 July 1993, Ass'n of Southeast Asian Nations, para. 16, http://www.asean.org/news/item/joint-communique-of-the-twenty-sixth-asean-ministerial-meeting-singapore-23-24-july-1993.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁰ Id. at para. 17.Google Scholar

¹⁴¹ The Commission has been criticized for its inability to protect individuals’ human rights. See Ginbar, supra note 131, at 514; Kapur, , supra note 28, at 1064.Google Scholar

¹⁴² ASEAN Intergovernmental Comm'n on Hum. Rts., Terms of Reference, § 1.6 (Oct. 2009), http://aichr.org/?dl_name=TOR-of-AICHR.pdf.Google Scholar

¹⁴³ Id. § 1.4.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁴ Those Southeast Asian countries that were independent at the time all voted for the adoption of the Declaration, namely the Union of Burma, the Republic of the Philippines, and the (then) Kingdom of Siam.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁵ G.A. Res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc. A/RES/217A(III) (Dec. 10, 1948), http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁶ Statute, Rome, supra note 6, pmbl., paras. 3–4.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁷ Kapur, , supra note 28, at 1068.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁸ Desierto, , supra note 90, at 95, 108; Kapur, , supra note 28, at 1069.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁹ Barcelona Traction (Belg. v. Spain), Judgment, 1970 I.C.J. 3, paras. 33-34 (Feb. 5, 1970).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁰ Currently, Brunei, Indonesia, and Thailand have not signed the Genocide Convention. See Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, United Nations Treaty Collection, https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-1&chapter=4&lang=en.Google Scholar

¹⁵¹ See Kapur, supra note 28, at 1070.Google Scholar

¹⁵² Rome Conference, supra note 22, at 163 (statement of Puyawat Niyomrerks, Deputy Director-General, Department of Treaties and Legal Affairs, Thai Ministry of Foreign Affairs).Google Scholar

¹⁵³ Kapur, , supra note 28, at 1070.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁴ See Tomuschat, Christian, Asia and Internationa! Law—Common Ground and Regional Diversity, 1 Asian J. Int'l L. 217, 227 (2011).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁵ Currently, Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam are observer states to the ASP.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁶ Song, , supra note 51, at 206.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁷ Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation Between the European Community and Its Member States, of the One Part, and the Republic of Indonesia, of the Other Part, Apr. 26, 2014, 2014 O.J. (L 125/17), art. 4(3), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2D14.125.01.0017.01.ENG; the EU-Indonesia PCA entered into force on 1 May 2014.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁸ Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation Between the European Union and Its Member States, of the One Part, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, of the Other Part, June 27, 2012, art. 11(4), http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/vietnam/documents/eu_vietnam/pca.pdf.Google Scholar