(1) WH Auden [2000], “If I Could Tell You”, in J Fuller, Poems selected by John Fuller (London: faber and faber). The review essay is translated from the German by Malcolm Maclaren.Google Scholar

(2) See generally: Zumbansen, P [2000], Ordnungsmuster im modernen Wohlfahrtsstaat, Lernerfahrungen zwischen Staat, Gesellschaft und Vertrag (Baden-Baden: Nomos).Google Scholar

(3) Grewlich, K [2001], Konstitutionalisierung des ”Cyberspace“ – zwischen europa-rechtlicher Regulierung und völkerrechtlicher Governance (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 15.Google Scholar

(4) Grewlich, [2001], 17.Google Scholar

(5) Grewlich, [2001], 17.Google Scholar

(6) Grewlich, K [2000], “Governance im Cyberspace – Regulierung globaler Netze im Sy-stemwettbewerb?”, 337 Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft 5, 338.Google Scholar

(7) See, hereto, e.g. Wilkinson, M, Postnationalism, (Dis)organised civil society and De-mocracy in the European Union: Is Constitutionalism Part of the Solution or Part of the Pro-blem?, in: 3 German Law Journal No. 9 (1 September 2002), available at: http://www.germanlawjournal.com/past_issues.php?id=192.Google Scholar

(8) Grewlich, [2001], 21.Google Scholar

(9) See also Baelz, /Baldwin, [2002] and Mock [2002], both in this issue; and Schanze/Jütters, in: Die Aktiengesellschaft [2003], issue 1, forthcoming; cf. the comprehensive study by E-M Kieninger, Wettbewerb der Privatrechtsordnungen im Europäischen Binnenmarkt (Mohr Siebeck: Tübingen 2002); Heine and Kerber, European Corporate Laws, Regula-tory Competition and Path Dependence, European Journal of Law and Economics 13 (2002), 47–71; Esty and Geradin (ed.), Regulatory Competition and Economic Integration, (Ox-ford/New York 2001).Google Scholar

(10) Grewlich, [2001], 53.Google Scholar

(11) Grewlich, [2001], 54.Google Scholar

(12) Fassbender, B [1998], “The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community”, 529 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 37; P Dupuy [1997], “The Constitutional Dimension of the Charter of the United Nations Revisited”, 1 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 1; R Uerpmann [2001], “Internationales Verfas-sungsrecht”, 565 Juristenzeitung 56; C Tomuschat [1993], “Obligations Arising for States Without or Against Their Will”, 195 Recueil des Cours; S Oeter [2000], “Inter-nationale Organisation oder Weltföderation? Die organisierte Staatengemeinschaft und das Verlangen nach einer ‘Verfassung der Freiheit'” in H Brunkhorst (ed.), Globalisierung und Demokratie: Wirtschaft, Recht, Medien (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp); C Walter [2001], “Con-stitutionalizing (Inter)national Governance: Possibilities for and Limits to the Development of an International Constitutional Law”, 170 German Yearbook of International Law 44; J Paust [2002], “Human Rights Responsibilities of Private Corporations”, 801 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 35; P Muchlinski [2001], “Human Rights and Multination-als: Is There a Problem?”, 31 International Affairs 77. In the context of the European integration process: C Joerges, Y Meny and JHH Weiler (eds.) [2000], What Kind of Con-stitution for What Kind of Polity? Responses to Joschka Fischer (Florence: Robert Schuman Centre); U Di Fabio [2000], “Eine europäische Charta”, 737 Juristenzeitung 55; A v Bogdandy [1999], Supranationaler Föderalismus als Wirklichkeit und Idee einer neuen Herrschaftsform: Zur Gestalt der Europäischen Union nach Amsterdam (Ba-den-Baden: Nomos).Google Scholar

(13) Mayer, FC [2002], “Das Internet, das Völkerrecht und die Internationalisierung des Rechts”, 93 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 23; HH Perritt [2000], “The Internet is Changing the Public International Legal System”, 885 KY L. R. 88.Google Scholar

(14) To resolve any misunderstanding: as Gunther Teubner also explicitly mentions an autonomous legal formation does not exclude an external political intervention. Each Global Law in question (lex mercatoria, lex electronica etc.) is expressly viewed from a legal pluralistic perspective as an empirically variable mixture of autonomous societal and political legal formation. See G Teubner [1997] “Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World So-ciety” in G Teubner (ed.), Global Law Without a State (Aldershot: Darmouth Gower).Google Scholar

(15) Reidenberg, JL [1998], “Lex Informatica:The Formulation of Information Policy Rules Through Technology”, 553 Texas Law Review 76; P Mayer [2000], “Selbstregulierung im Internet: Institutionen und Verfahren zur Setzung technischer Standards”, 13 Kommunikation & Recht 1.Google Scholar

(16) Lessig, L (1999), Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace (New York: Basic Books). For a similiar argument, though diametrically opposite to the regulatory aspirations of Lessig see: DG Post [1995], “Anarchy, State and the Internet: An Essay on Law Making in Cyberspace”, Journal of Online Law art. 3, available at (http://www.temple.edu/lawschool/dpost/Anarchy.html)Google Scholar

(17) Mueller, ML [2002], Ruling the Root: Internet Governance and the Taming of Cyber-space (Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press); V Karavas and G Teubner [2003 forthcoming], “http://www.CompanyNameSucks: Grundrechte gegenüber “Privaten” im autonomen Recht des Internet?” in W Hoffmann-Riem and KH Ladeur (eds.), Innovationsoffene Regu-lierung des Internet (Baden-Baden: Nomos); GP Calliess [2002 forthcoming], “Reflex-ive Transnational Law: The Privatisation of Civil Law and the Civilisation of Private Law”, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 24; D Lehmkuhl [2002], “The Resolution of Domain Names vs. Trademark Conflikts”, 61 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 23; K Blackman [2001], “The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy: A Cheaper Way to Hijack Domain Names and Supress Critics”, 211 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 15; A Goldstein [2002], “ICANNSucks.biz (And Why You Can't Say That): How Fair Use of Trademarks in Domain Names is Being Restrained, 1151 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 12; D Hancock [2001], “An Assessment of ICANN's Mandatory Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy in Resolving Disputes Over Domain Names”, The Journal of Information, Law and Technology 1, available at (http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01-3/hancock.html); DC Najarian [2001], “Internet Domains and Trademark Claims: First Amendment Considerations”, 127 Journal of Law & Technology 41; RS Sorgen [2001], “Trademark Confronts Free Speech on the Information Super-highway: “Cybergripers” Face a Constitutional Collision”, 115 Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review 22.Google Scholar

(18) Ladeur, KH [2002], “Rechtsfragen des Ausschlusses von Teilnehmern an Diskussions-foren im Internet: Zur Absicherung von Kommunikationsfreiheit durch netzwerkgerechtes Privatrecht”, 787 Multimedia und Recht 5; P Zumbansen [2003 forthcoming], “Die engen Wände der Internetwelt: Autonomie und Kontrolle jenseits staatlicher Steuerung und gesellschaftlicher Eigenorganisation” in W Hoffmann-Riem and KH Ladeur (eds.), Innovationsoffene Regulierung des Internet (Baden-Baden: Nomos); A Mefford [1997], “Lex Informatica: Foundations of Law on the Internet”, 211 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 5; P Flichy [2001], L’ Imaginaire d’ Internet (Paris: éditi-ons la découverte).Google Scholar

(19) GE Evans [1999], “Opportunity Costs of Globalising Information Licences: Embed-ding Consumer Rights within the Legislative Framework for Information Contracts”, 267 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 10; JH Reich-man and JA Franklin [1999], “Privately Legislated Intellectual Property Rights: Reconciling Freedom of Contract with Public Good Uses of Information”, 875 U. Pa. L. Rev. 147; CR McManis [1999], “The Privatization (or “Shrink-Wrapping”) of American Copyright Law”, 173 California Law Review 87.Google Scholar

(20) Tangl, A [2000], “Elektronische” Geschäftsbedingungen (“e-AGB”): Ein Blick auf einschlägige Rechtsgrundlagen und Entwicklungen in der EU (insbes. Österreich) und in den USA, Überlegungen zu einer ”internetspezifischen“ Einbeziehungskontrolle” in Jahrbuch Junger Zivilrechtswissenschaftler2000 (Stuttgart: Richard Boorberg).Google Scholar

(21) Zumbansen, P [2002], “Piercing the Legal Veil: Commercial Arbitration and Transnational Law”, 8 European Law Journal pp. 400–432, also available at http://www.iue.it/PUB/law02-11.pdf Google Scholar

(22) Teubner, G [2003 forthcoming], “Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-centred Constitutional Theory” in C Joerges, IJ Sand, G Teubner (eds.), Constitutionalism and Transnational Governance (London: Hart).Google Scholar