Article contents
Recent Developments in Austrian Asylum Law: A Race to the Bottom?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Abstract
The Austrian asylum policy is shifting from a showcase of support to asylum seekers to one of the most restrictive in Europe. Recent amendments to the asylum law are due to the massive influx of asylum seekers in 2015/2016 as a result of which Austria has accepted the second largest number of asylum seekers per capita in Europe. The Austrian government first responded by setting an upper limit of asylum applications from 2016 and then by creating the possibility of suspending its obligations under international and European asylum law. Both measures are legally doubtful and based on the assumption that if the upper limit is met this may threaten the maintenance of public order and the protection of internal security, which is not possible to prove. The contribution provides a legal analysis of the recent legal developments in Austrian asylum law, which are reviewed from the perspective of international and European asylum law as well as human rights. It concludes that the Austrian measures are part of a race to the bottom of European countries with the purpose of keeping refugees away. They cannot be justified from a legal perspective and create a threat to the respect for the rule of law.
- Type
- Special issue - Constitutional Dimensions of the Refugee Crisis
- Information
- German Law Journal , Volume 17 , Issue 6: Special issue - Constitutional Dimensions of the Refugee Crisis , 01 November 2016 , pp. 949 - 966
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2016 by German Law Journal, Inc.
References
1 See Volker Türk, A World in Turmoil, in European Yearkbook on Human Rights 27–30 (Wolfgang Benedek, Florence Benoît-Rohmer, Kettemann, Matthias C., Reinhard Klaushofer & Manfred Nowak eds., 2016); Manfred Nowak & Antonia Elisabeth Walter, The Crises of the European Refugee Policy, in European Yearkbook on Human Rights 31–55 (Wolfgang Benedek, Florence Benoît-Rohmer, Kettemann, Matthias C., Reinhard Klaushofer & Manfred Nowak eds., 2016).Google Scholar
2 Bundesministerium für Inneres, 50 Jahre Genfer Flüchtlingskonvention In Österreich (2005).Google Scholar
3 According to the Federal Ministry of Interior, between September 5, 2015, and June 6, 2016, 803,600 aliens entered Austria of which 56,600 applied for international protection. See the proposed Regulation of the Federal Government on the Finding of the Endangerment of the Maintance of Public Order and the Protection of Internal Security [Verordnung der Bundesregierung zur Feststellung der Gefährdung der Aufrechterhaltung der öffentlichen Ordnung und des Schutzes der inneren Sicherheit], [hereinafter Regulation on the Finding of Endangerment], Justification according to Para. 36 (2) of the Austrian Asylum Law.Google Scholar
4 See Kurz, Sebastian, Australien Weiter Vorbild, Die Presse (Aug. 18, 2016), https://www.pressreader.com/austria/diepresse/20160818/281676844315791. See also Benedek, Wolfgang, Die Flüchtlinge und der Rechtsstaat, 119 Politicum 50–53 (Apr. 6, 2016), http://politicum.at/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/politicum_119_inn.pdf.Google Scholar
5 Zwischenbilanz Des Expertenrates Zum 50 Punkte-Plan, in Integrationsbericht 2016 (2016), https://www.bmeia.gv.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Zentrale/Integration/Integrationsbericht_2016/Integrationsbericht_2016_WEB.pdf [hereinafter Austrian integration Report].Google Scholar
6 Id.; see also Bundesministerium für Inneres, http://www.bmi.gv.at/cms/bmi_asylwesen/statistik/start.aspx.Google Scholar
7 See Noch 7,144 Asylanträge bis zur Obergrenze, Die Presse (November 11, 2016, at 11), http://www.pressreader.com/austria/diepresse/20161111/.Google Scholar
8 See, e.g., Fifth Report on Relocation and Resettlement, European Commission (July 13, 2016), http://www.statewatch.org/news/2016/jul/eu-com-relocation-resettlement-5th-report-com-340-annex-3-resettlement.pdf.Google Scholar
9 In Austria alone, 7,200 asylum seekers should be sent back to Hungary, while for several EU-countries the number of Dublin III-cases for which Hungary should be responsible in August 2016 was given as 19,542. See Die Presse (August 23, 2016, at 5),Google Scholar
10 Austrian Integration Report, supra note 5, at 26 and 29.Google Scholar
11 Wolfgang Benedek, Gegen eine polarisierende Obergrenze, Kleine Zeitung 42 (Jan. 27, 2016), https://static.uni-graz.at/fileadmin/projekte/refugee-law-clinic/KZ__Gegen_eine_polarisierende_Obergrenze__27.1.2016_.pdf.Google Scholar
12 Walter Obwexer & Bernd-Christian Funk, Gutachten, Völker-, Unions- und Verfassungsrechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für den beim Asylgipfel am 20.01.2016 in Aussicht genommenen Richtwert für Flüchtlinge (Mar. 29, 2016), http://www.bundeskanzleramt.at/DocView.axd?CobId=62571 [hereinafter Opinion].Google Scholar
13 Id. at 84.Google Scholar
14 Id. at 85; Verfassungsgerichtshof [VfGH] [Constitutional Court of Austria] Mar. 14, 2012, Case No. U 466/11 (2012).http://diepresse.com/home/politik/aussenpolitik/5072787/Osterreich_Ungarn-nahm-nur-vier-von-7200-abgeschobenen-Fluchtlingen.Google Scholar
15 opinion, supra note 12, at 56–58.Google Scholar
16 See Directive on Common Procedures for Granting and Withdrawing International Protection 2013/32/EU, 2013 O.J. (L 180/60) [hereinafter Asylum Procedure Directive].Google Scholar
17 opinion, supra note 12, at 18–20.Google Scholar
18 Asylum Procedure Directive, supra note 16, at art. 33 (2) (a)-(b), 35.Google Scholar
19 European Convention of Human Rights art. 3 [hereinafter ECHR]Google Scholar
20 Id. at art. 8.Google Scholar
21 EU Charter on Fundamental Rights art. 47 [hereinafter EU CFR].Google Scholar
22 Id. art. 19.Google Scholar
23 Id. at art. 18.Google Scholar
24 Gesamtändernder Abänderungsantrag mit dem das Asylgesetz 2005, das Fremdenpolizeigesetz 2005 und das BFA-Verfahrensgesetz geändert werden, [hereinafter Motion on the Amended Law on Asylum] https://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/VHG/XXV/AUA/AUA_00004/imfname_525278.pdf.Google Scholar
26 Id. No.17 on paras. 37 and 38.Google Scholar
27 Id. No. 17 on para. 38.Google Scholar
28 ECHR, supra note 19, at arts. 2, 3.Google Scholar
29 Id. at art. 8; Amendment to Law on Asylum, supra note 25, No.17 on paras. 40 (2), 41 (1).Google Scholar
30 Explanations to para. 41 of the Motion on the Amended Law on Asylum, supra note 24, at 31–32.Google Scholar
31 Law on Asylum 2005, BGBl. I, No. 100/2005 as amended.Google Scholar
32 See Verfassungsgerichtshof [VfGH] [Constitutional Court of Austria] Press Release, Bundespräsidenten-Stichwahl Muss in ganz Österreich und komplett wiederholt werden, (July 1, 2016), https://www.vfgh.gv.at/downloads/verkuendung_w_presseinformation.pdf; see for the decision Verfassungsgerichtshof [VfGH] [Constitutional Court of Austria], July 1, 2016, No. W I 6/2016-125.Google Scholar
33 UNHCR Press Release, Alarmierende Änderungen im Österreichischen Flüchtlingsschutz Geplant (Apr. 21, 2016), http://www.unhcr.at/presse/pressemitteilungen/artikel/d3ec3a9914ed0dd212109d971067ae06/alarmierende-aenderungen-im-oesterreichischen-fluechtlingsschutz.html.Google Scholar
34 ,Stellungnahme zum Bundesgesetz betreffend die Änderung des AsylG 205, FPG 2005 u dBFA-Verfahrensänderungsgesetz 2005, Uni. of Graz, https://refugee-law-clinic.uni-graz.at/de/neuigkeiten/ [hereinafter Uni. of Graz].Google Scholar
35 EU CFR, supra note 21, at art. 47.Google Scholar
36 Uni. of Graz, supra note 34, at 8–9.Google Scholar
37 Mohammed v. Austria, App. No. 2283/12, para 81 (June 6, 2013), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press#{“fulltext”:[“2283/12”]}.Google Scholar
38 Regulation on the Finding of Endangerment, supra note 3, para.1.Google Scholar
39 Justification to the Regulation on the Finding of Endangerment, supra note 3, at 5–8.Google Scholar
40 Id. at 4.Google Scholar
41 Id. at 8.Google Scholar
42 See, AMS (Arbeitsmarktservice), Übersicht über den Arbeitsmarkt (Sept. 2016), http://www.ams.at/_docs/001_uebersicht_aktuell.pdf.Google Scholar
43 Justification to the Regulation on the Finding of Endangerment, supra note 3, at 3 and 4.Google Scholar
44 See Ruhe an der Grenze hat ihren Preis, KLEINE ZEITUNG 19 (Aug. 27, 2016), https://www.pressreader.com/austria/kleine-zeitung-steiermark/20160827/textview.Google Scholar
45 See Law, Austrian Asylum, as amended, supra note 31, at para. 3 (4).Google Scholar
46 See Law, Austrian Asylum, as amended, supra note 31, paras. 36 (1), 35 (2).Google Scholar
47 See Bonavida, Iris, Asylrecht: Eine Reform in der Dauerschleife, Die Presse (Aug. 23, 2016), http://diepresse.com/home/politik/innenpolitik/5073079/Asylrecht_Eine-Reform-in-der-Dauerschleife.Google Scholar
48 The Austrian Council of Ministers adopted the requirement to get education until the age of 18 on July 6, 2016, published on July 7, 2016 as the Jugendausbildungsgesetz, July 30, 2016, BGBl. I 62/2016, https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblAuth/BGBLA_2016_I_62/BGBLA_2016_I_62.pdf.Google Scholar
49 N.N. “Deckel verfassungswidrig”. Mindestsicherung. Die SPÖ lehnt eine Obergrenze von 1500 Euro weiterhin ab. Sozialminister Alois Stöger verweist auf zwei Gutachten, Die Presse 5 (July 27, 2016), http://www.pressreader.com/austria/diepresse/20160727/281590944927068.Google Scholar
50 See Aichinger, Phillip, Iris Bonavida & Thomas Prior, ÖVP: Illegale Einreise als Straftat, Die Presse (Aug. 17, 2016, 6:23 PM), http://diepresse.com/home/politik/innenpolitik/5070452/OVP_Illegale-Einreise-als-Straftat; see also Bonavida, Iris, Sobotka: Ohne Wohnsitzpflicht keine Grundversorgung, Die Presse (Aug. 24, 2016, 6:21 PM) http://diepresse.com/home/politik/innenpolitik/5073779/Sobotka_Ohne-Wohnsitzpflicht-keine-Grundversorgung.Google Scholar
51 See Kocina, Erich, Juncker maßregelt Platter und “Landesobermuftis,” Die Presse 3 (Aug. 28, 2016), http://diepresse.com/home/alpbach/5072398/Juncker-massregelt-Platter-und-Landesobermuftis.Google Scholar
52 See Towards a Reform of the Common European Asylum System and Enhancing Legal Avenues to Europe, European Commission (Apr. 6, 2016), http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/proposal-implementation-package/docs/20160406/towards_a_reform_of_the_common_european_asylum_system_and_enhancing_legal_avenues_to_europe_-_20160406_en.pdf.Google Scholar
53 European Commission Press Release IP/16/2433, Completing the Reform of the Common European Asylum System: Towards an Efficient, Fair, and Humane Asylum Policy (July 13, 2016).Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by