Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T00:17:15.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recent Developments in Austrian Asylum Law: A Race to the Bottom?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Austrian asylum policy is shifting from a showcase of support to asylum seekers to one of the most restrictive in Europe. Recent amendments to the asylum law are due to the massive influx of asylum seekers in 2015/2016 as a result of which Austria has accepted the second largest number of asylum seekers per capita in Europe. The Austrian government first responded by setting an upper limit of asylum applications from 2016 and then by creating the possibility of suspending its obligations under international and European asylum law. Both measures are legally doubtful and based on the assumption that if the upper limit is met this may threaten the maintenance of public order and the protection of internal security, which is not possible to prove. The contribution provides a legal analysis of the recent legal developments in Austrian asylum law, which are reviewed from the perspective of international and European asylum law as well as human rights. It concludes that the Austrian measures are part of a race to the bottom of European countries with the purpose of keeping refugees away. They cannot be justified from a legal perspective and create a threat to the respect for the rule of law.

Type
Special issue - Constitutional Dimensions of the Refugee Crisis
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by German Law Journal, Inc. 

References

1 See Volker Türk, A World in Turmoil, in European Yearkbook on Human Rights 27–30 (Wolfgang Benedek, Florence Benoît-Rohmer, Kettemann, Matthias C., Reinhard Klaushofer & Manfred Nowak eds., 2016); Manfred Nowak & Antonia Elisabeth Walter, The Crises of the European Refugee Policy, in European Yearkbook on Human Rights 31–55 (Wolfgang Benedek, Florence Benoît-Rohmer, Kettemann, Matthias C., Reinhard Klaushofer & Manfred Nowak eds., 2016).Google Scholar

2 Bundesministerium für Inneres, 50 Jahre Genfer Flüchtlingskonvention In Österreich (2005).Google Scholar

3 According to the Federal Ministry of Interior, between September 5, 2015, and June 6, 2016, 803,600 aliens entered Austria of which 56,600 applied for international protection. See the proposed Regulation of the Federal Government on the Finding of the Endangerment of the Maintance of Public Order and the Protection of Internal Security [Verordnung der Bundesregierung zur Feststellung der Gefährdung der Aufrechterhaltung der öffentlichen Ordnung und des Schutzes der inneren Sicherheit], [hereinafter Regulation on the Finding of Endangerment], Justification according to Para. 36 (2) of the Austrian Asylum Law.Google Scholar

4 See Kurz, Sebastian, Australien Weiter Vorbild, Die Presse (Aug. 18, 2016), https://www.pressreader.com/austria/diepresse/20160818/281676844315791. See also Benedek, Wolfgang, Die Flüchtlinge und der Rechtsstaat, 119 Politicum 50–53 (Apr. 6, 2016), http://politicum.at/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/politicum_119_inn.pdf.Google Scholar

5 Zwischenbilanz Des Expertenrates Zum 50 Punkte-Plan, in Integrationsbericht 2016 (2016), https://www.bmeia.gv.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Zentrale/Integration/Integrationsbericht_2016/Integrationsbericht_2016_WEB.pdf [hereinafter Austrian integration Report].Google Scholar

6 Id.; see also Bundesministerium für Inneres, http://www.bmi.gv.at/cms/bmi_asylwesen/statistik/start.aspx.Google Scholar

7 See Noch 7,144 Asylanträge bis zur Obergrenze, Die Presse (November 11, 2016, at 11), http://www.pressreader.com/austria/diepresse/20161111/.Google Scholar

8 See, e.g., Fifth Report on Relocation and Resettlement, European Commission (July 13, 2016), http://www.statewatch.org/news/2016/jul/eu-com-relocation-resettlement-5th-report-com-340-annex-3-resettlement.pdf.Google Scholar

9 In Austria alone, 7,200 asylum seekers should be sent back to Hungary, while for several EU-countries the number of Dublin III-cases for which Hungary should be responsible in August 2016 was given as 19,542. See Die Presse (August 23, 2016, at 5),Google Scholar

10 Austrian Integration Report, supra note 5, at 26 and 29.Google Scholar

11 Wolfgang Benedek, Gegen eine polarisierende Obergrenze, Kleine Zeitung 42 (Jan. 27, 2016), https://static.uni-graz.at/fileadmin/projekte/refugee-law-clinic/KZ__Gegen_eine_polarisierende_Obergrenze__27.1.2016_.pdf.Google Scholar

12 Walter Obwexer & Bernd-Christian Funk, Gutachten, Völker-, Unions- und Verfassungsrechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für den beim Asylgipfel am 20.01.2016 in Aussicht genommenen Richtwert für Flüchtlinge (Mar. 29, 2016), http://www.bundeskanzleramt.at/DocView.axd?CobId=62571 [hereinafter Opinion].Google Scholar

13 Id. at 84.Google Scholar

14 Id. at 85; Verfassungsgerichtshof [VfGH] [Constitutional Court of Austria] Mar. 14, 2012, Case No. U 466/11 (2012).http://diepresse.com/home/politik/aussenpolitik/5072787/Osterreich_Ungarn-nahm-nur-vier-von-7200-abgeschobenen-Fluchtlingen.Google Scholar

15 opinion, supra note 12, at 56–58.Google Scholar

16 See Directive on Common Procedures for Granting and Withdrawing International Protection 2013/32/EU, 2013 O.J. (L 180/60) [hereinafter Asylum Procedure Directive].Google Scholar

17 opinion, supra note 12, at 18–20.Google Scholar

18 Asylum Procedure Directive, supra note 16, at art. 33 (2) (a)-(b), 35.Google Scholar

19 European Convention of Human Rights art. 3 [hereinafter ECHR]Google Scholar

20 Id. at art. 8.Google Scholar

21 EU Charter on Fundamental Rights art. 47 [hereinafter EU CFR].Google Scholar

22 Id. art. 19.Google Scholar

23 Id. at art. 18.Google Scholar

24 Gesamtändernder Abänderungsantrag mit dem das Asylgesetz 2005, das Fremdenpolizeigesetz 2005 und das BFA-Verfahrensgesetz geändert werden, [hereinafter Motion on the Amended Law on Asylum] https://www.parlament.gv.at/PAKT/VHG/XXV/AUA/AUA_00004/imfname_525278.pdf.Google Scholar

26 Id. No.17 on paras. 37 and 38.Google Scholar

27 Id. No. 17 on para. 38.Google Scholar

28 ECHR, supra note 19, at arts. 2, 3.Google Scholar

29 Id. at art. 8; Amendment to Law on Asylum, supra note 25, No.17 on paras. 40 (2), 41 (1).Google Scholar

30 Explanations to para. 41 of the Motion on the Amended Law on Asylum, supra note 24, at 31–32.Google Scholar

31 Law on Asylum 2005, BGBl. I, No. 100/2005 as amended.Google Scholar

32 See Verfassungsgerichtshof [VfGH] [Constitutional Court of Austria] Press Release, Bundespräsidenten-Stichwahl Muss in ganz Österreich und komplett wiederholt werden, (July 1, 2016), https://www.vfgh.gv.at/downloads/verkuendung_w_presseinformation.pdf; see for the decision Verfassungsgerichtshof [VfGH] [Constitutional Court of Austria], July 1, 2016, No. W I 6/2016-125.Google Scholar

33 UNHCR Press Release, Alarmierende Änderungen im Österreichischen Flüchtlingsschutz Geplant (Apr. 21, 2016), http://www.unhcr.at/presse/pressemitteilungen/artikel/d3ec3a9914ed0dd212109d971067ae06/alarmierende-aenderungen-im-oesterreichischen-fluechtlingsschutz.html.Google Scholar

34 ,Stellungnahme zum Bundesgesetz betreffend die Änderung des AsylG 205, FPG 2005 u dBFA-Verfahrensänderungsgesetz 2005, Uni. of Graz, https://refugee-law-clinic.uni-graz.at/de/neuigkeiten/ [hereinafter Uni. of Graz].Google Scholar

35 EU CFR, supra note 21, at art. 47.Google Scholar

36 Uni. of Graz, supra note 34, at 8–9.Google Scholar

37 Mohammed v. Austria, App. No. 2283/12, para 81 (June 6, 2013), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press#{“fulltext”:[“2283/12”]}.Google Scholar

38 Regulation on the Finding of Endangerment, supra note 3, para.1.Google Scholar

39 Justification to the Regulation on the Finding of Endangerment, supra note 3, at 5–8.Google Scholar

40 Id. at 4.Google Scholar

41 Id. at 8.Google Scholar

42 See, AMS (Arbeitsmarktservice), Übersicht über den Arbeitsmarkt (Sept. 2016), http://www.ams.at/_docs/001_uebersicht_aktuell.pdf.Google Scholar

43 Justification to the Regulation on the Finding of Endangerment, supra note 3, at 3 and 4.Google Scholar

44 See Ruhe an der Grenze hat ihren Preis, KLEINE ZEITUNG 19 (Aug. 27, 2016), https://www.pressreader.com/austria/kleine-zeitung-steiermark/20160827/textview.Google Scholar

45 See Law, Austrian Asylum, as amended, supra note 31, at para. 3 (4).Google Scholar

46 See Law, Austrian Asylum, as amended, supra note 31, paras. 36 (1), 35 (2).Google Scholar

47 See Bonavida, Iris, Asylrecht: Eine Reform in der Dauerschleife, Die Presse (Aug. 23, 2016), http://diepresse.com/home/politik/innenpolitik/5073079/Asylrecht_Eine-Reform-in-der-Dauerschleife.Google Scholar

48 The Austrian Council of Ministers adopted the requirement to get education until the age of 18 on July 6, 2016, published on July 7, 2016 as the Jugendausbildungsgesetz, July 30, 2016, BGBl. I 62/2016, https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblAuth/BGBLA_2016_I_62/BGBLA_2016_I_62.pdf.Google Scholar

49 N.N. “Deckel verfassungswidrig”. Mindestsicherung. Die SPÖ lehnt eine Obergrenze von 1500 Euro weiterhin ab. Sozialminister Alois Stöger verweist auf zwei Gutachten, Die Presse 5 (July 27, 2016), http://www.pressreader.com/austria/diepresse/20160727/281590944927068.Google Scholar

50 See Aichinger, Phillip, Iris Bonavida & Thomas Prior, ÖVP: Illegale Einreise als Straftat, Die Presse (Aug. 17, 2016, 6:23 PM), http://diepresse.com/home/politik/innenpolitik/5070452/OVP_Illegale-Einreise-als-Straftat; see also Bonavida, Iris, Sobotka: Ohne Wohnsitzpflicht keine Grundversorgung, Die Presse (Aug. 24, 2016, 6:21 PM) http://diepresse.com/home/politik/innenpolitik/5073779/Sobotka_Ohne-Wohnsitzpflicht-keine-Grundversorgung.Google Scholar

51 See Kocina, Erich, Juncker maßregelt Platter und “Landesobermuftis,” Die Presse 3 (Aug. 28, 2016), http://diepresse.com/home/alpbach/5072398/Juncker-massregelt-Platter-und-Landesobermuftis.Google Scholar

53 European Commission Press Release IP/16/2433, Completing the Reform of the Common European Asylum System: Towards an Efficient, Fair, and Humane Asylum Policy (July 13, 2016).Google Scholar