Article contents
Progressive Eras, Periods of Reaction, and Constitutional Change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Abstract
This article argues that “political herding” plays a crucial role in driving and shaping constitutional change. It links the prevalence of political herding to a psychological phenomenon, “social influence.” It goes on to argue that constitutional change is often driven by the desire for certain substantive policies, which in turn are determined by whether, in a particular epoch, the political community is herding in a progressive or reactionary direction. Contending that the general phenomenon whereby political communities go through recurrent swings to the left or to the right has been neglected by scholars, this essay aims to give this phenomenon the centrality it merits in relation to the evolution of the British constitution. Accordingly it considers the 1906 Liberal government, the 1945 Labour government and the lengthy succession of post-1979 neoliberal governments, analyzing how substantive progressive and reactionary programs led to constitutional change. Finally this article considers the legitimacy both of political herding itself, and of political herding's impact on constitutional change.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2014 by German Law Journal GbR
References
1 See Brummer, Alex, The Crunch: How Greed and Incompetence Sparked the Credit Crisis (2009).Google Scholar
2 The transnational dimension of herding is not the focus of this essay. On this aspect, see Nicol, Danny, The Constitutional Protection of Capitalism (2010). See also Ian Bartle, Globalization and EU Policy-making: The Neoliberal Transformation of Telecommunications and Electricity (2005).Google Scholar
3 See Wright, Anthony, The Constitution, in Party Ideology in Britain 191 (Leonard Tivey & Anthony Wright eds., 1989).Google Scholar
4 It is not part of my argument that constitutional change is always so driven.Google Scholar
5 See Hayward, J.E.S., The Political Science of Muddling Through: a de facto Paradigm?, in The Political Science of British Politics 3 (J.E.S. Hayward & Philip Norton eds., 1986).Google Scholar
6 See Norton, Philip & Hayward, J.E.S., Retrospective Reflections, in The Political Science of British Politics (J.E.S. Hayward & Philip Norton eds., 1986).Google Scholar
7 Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebook 322 (1971).Google Scholar
8 Kassin, Saul, Fein, Steven & Markus, Helen Rose, Social Psychology 95 (7th ed. 2008).Google Scholar
9 See id. at 252–59.Google Scholar
10 See, e.g., Moscovici, Serge, The Invention of Society: Psychological Explanations for Social Phenomena (1993).Google Scholar
11 Billig, Michael, Ideology and Options 11 (1991).Google Scholar
12 Billig, Michael, Condor, Susan, Edwards, Derek, Gane, Mike, Middleton, David & Radley, Alan, Ideological Dilemmas (1988). The authors accept that one can differentiate between lived ideology—the culture of a society—and intellectual ideology—the very different concept of an intellectual system of ideas. Nonetheless there are contrary themes both between and within lived and intellectual ideologies.Google Scholar
13 A pioneering attempt to link psychology to constitutional matters is made in Dawn Oliver, Psychological Constitutionalism, 69 Cambridge L.J. 639 (2010).Google Scholar
14 Watts, Duncan, Whigs, Radicals and Liberals 1815–1914 137–38 (2002).Google Scholar
15 Cook, Chris, A Short History of the Liberal Party 1900–84 47 (1984).Google Scholar
16 See Oliver, , supra note 13, at 139.Google Scholar
17 See Watts, , supra note 14, at 47.Google Scholar
18 Id. at 48.Google Scholar
19 G.R. Searle, The Liberal Party: Triumph and Disintegration 1886–1929 97 (1992).Google Scholar
20 See Oliver, , supra note 13, at 148.Google Scholar
21 See Watts, , supra note 14, at 55.Google Scholar
22 See Oliver, , supra note 13, at 156.Google Scholar
23 Craig, Paul, Sovereignty of the United Kingdom Parliament after Factortame, 11 Y.B. Eur.L. 221, 237 (1991).Google Scholar
24 See e.g., Nicol, Danny, The Constitutional Protection of Capitalism ch. 1 (2010) (describing the conception of democracy).Google Scholar
25 “Balance,” like “the rule of law,” is a word/phrase which has a force or power of its own. For a constitution to lack balance automatically casts it in an unfavourable light. But, as Paul Craig himself has observed, one has to be clear as to the conception of balance which is being posited, and the particular theory of justice on which that conception is based. See Craig, Paul, Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework, Pub.L. 467, 487 (1997).Google Scholar
26 See Watts, supra note 14, at 96.Google Scholar
27 Bentley, M., The Liberal Response to Socialism 1918–29, in Essays in Anti-Labour History (K.D. Brown ed., 1974).Google Scholar
28 Barker, Ernest, Essays on Government 124 (1914).Google Scholar
29 Pimlott, Ben, Labour and the Left in the 1930s 145–47 (1977).Google Scholar
30 Morgan, Kenneth, The Labour Party Since 1945, in UK Political Parties Since 1945 (Anthony Seldon ed., 1990).Google Scholar
31 Attlee, Clement, The Labour Party in Perspective (1937).Google Scholar
32 Douglas, Jay, Change and Fortune 63 (1980).Google Scholar
33 Pimlott, Ben, Hugh Dalton 223 (1985).Google Scholar
34 Foote, Geoffrey, The Labour Party's Political Thought: A History 183–99 (1985).Google Scholar
35 Thorpe, Andrew, A History of the British Labour Party 98 (1987).Google Scholar
36 Id. at 99–101.Google Scholar
37 Pearce, Robert, Attlee's Labour Governments 1945–51 14 (1994).Google Scholar
38 See Thorpe, , supra note 35, at 108.Google Scholar
39 Friedrich. A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (1986).Google Scholar
40 Laybourne, Keith, The Rise of Labour 105 (1988).Google Scholar
41 Martin, Kingsley, Harold Laski (1953).Google Scholar
42 See Thorpe, , supra note 35, at 123.Google Scholar
43 See Pearce, , supra note 37, at 48.Google Scholar
44 Miliband, Ralph, Parliamentary Socialism 288 (1972).Google Scholar
45 Morgan, Kenneth, Labour in Power 1945–1951 (1984).Google Scholar
46 See Thorpe, , supra note 35, at 125.Google Scholar
47 See Attlee, , supra note 31, at 172.Google Scholar
48 See Pearce, , supra note 37, at 56.Google Scholar
49 Theakston, Kevin, The Labour Party and Whitehall 73 (1992).Google Scholar
50 Id. at 101.Google Scholar
51 See Brummer, , supra note 1, at ch. 1.Google Scholar
52 Tivey, Leonard, Economic and Industrial Policy, in Party Ideology in Britain 132 (Leonard Tivey & Anthony Wright eds., 1989).Google Scholar
53 See Laybourne, , supra note 40, at 120.Google Scholar
54 Morgan, , supra note 30.Google Scholar
55 Mitchell, Austin, Election '45 119 (1995).Google Scholar
56 O'Sullivan, Noel, Conservatism, the New Right and the Limited State, in The Political Science of British Politics (Jack Hayward & Philip Norton eds., 1996).Google Scholar
57 See Pearce, , supra note 37, at 51, 54–6.Google Scholar
58 Letwin argues that the Charter unequivocally committed the Tories to maintaining full employment and the welfare state, to lavish spending of public money, and generally to expanding the power of the State, which accepted nationalization as irreversible. She points out that it sold 2.5 million copies in six months. Harold Macmillan rejoiced that the ‘progressive element in the party’ had ‘seized control … by the vigour of its intellectual and spiritual power.‘ Shirley Letwin, The Anatomy Of Thatcherism 56 (1992).Google Scholar
59 Ryan, Alan, Party Ideologies Since 1945, in UK Political Parties Since 1945 81–3 (Anthony Selden ed., 1990).Google Scholar
60 Francis Beckett argues there was no real post-war consensus because of deep Conservative skepticism about the welfare state. See Beckett, Francis, Clem Attlee 264 (1997).Google Scholar
61 See Wright, Anthony, The Constitution, in Party Ideology in Britain 187 (Leonard Tivey & Anthony Wright eds., 1989).Google Scholar
62 See id. Google Scholar
63 Skidelsky, Robert, Introduction, in Thatcherism 1 (Robert Skidelsky ed., 1988).Google Scholar
64 See Joseph, Keith, The Humanity of Capitalism, The Times, Jul. 28, 1986.Google Scholar
65 See Cockett, Richard, Thinking the Unthinkable: Think Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution 1931–1989 243 (1995).Google Scholar
66 See Gamble, Andrew, The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism 116 (1988).Google Scholar
67 See Letwin, , supra note 58, at ch. 12.Google Scholar
68 See Jenkins, Simon, Thatcher and Sons: A Revolution in Three Acts ch. 8 (2006).Google Scholar
69 See Bogdanor, Vernon, The Constitution, in The Thatcher Effect 137 (Dennis Kavanagh & Anthony Seldon eds., 1989).Google Scholar
70 See Hayek, Friedrich, The Constitution of Liberty 184–85 (1978).Google Scholar
71 See Gamble, Andrew, The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism ch. 4 (1994).Google Scholar
72 See Brittan, Samuel, The Thatcher Government's Economic Power, in The Thatcher Effect: A Decade of Change 3 (Dennis Kavanagh & Anthony Seldon, eds., 1989).Google Scholar
73 Jenkins, , supra note 68, at 4.Google Scholar
74 See Seldon, Anthony, Major: A Political Life 502–07 (1997).Google Scholar
75 See Jenkins, , supra note 68, at 206.Google Scholar
76 Major, John, The Autobiography 734 (1999).Google Scholar
77 See Colin, Hay, The Political Economy of New Labour, in The New Labour Reader 59 (Andrew Chadwick & Richard Heffernan eds., 2003). The Policy Review accepted that the privatizations of the Thatcher government ought not to be reversed. See Fielding, Steven, The Labour Party 203 (2003).Google Scholar
78 See Driver, Stephen & Martell, Luke, New Labour: Politics after Thatcherism 40 (1998).Google Scholar
79 See Heffernan, Richard, New Labour and Thatcherism, in The New Labour Reader 49 (Andrew Chadwick & Richard Heffernan, eds., 2003).Google Scholar
80 Jenkins, , supra note 68, at 258.Google Scholar
81 See Fielding, Steven, The Labour Party: Continuity and Change in the Making of ‘New‘ Labour 203 (2003).Google Scholar
82 For example, by the end of New Labour's tenure eighty percent of care homes had been privatized.Google Scholar
83 See Rawnsley, Andrew, Servants of the People: The Inside Story of New Labour 110 (2000).Google Scholar
84 See Brummer, , supra note 1, at 88–90.Google Scholar
85 See Thatcher, Margaret, The Downing Street Years ch. 18 (1993).Google Scholar
86 Turner comments that post-SEA there was a growing realization within the party that the single market was merely a prelude to further integrationist moves. Having sold membership to the public on the pragmatic basis that “Europe” was essentially an economic and trading organization, Mrs. Thatcher distanced herself from the Treaty she had signed. See Turner, John, The Tories and Europe 104–08 (2000).Google Scholar
87 Gamble, , supra note 71, at 239.Google Scholar
88 See Turner, , supra note 86, at 557.Google Scholar
89 It is after all the leader of the party best able to secure a Commons majority who becomes Prime Minister, and the rules of the party determine who becomes leader.Google Scholar
90 Mair, Peter, Partyless Democracy, 2 New Left Rev. 21 (2000).Google Scholar
91 Id. Google Scholar
92 See Quinn, Thomas, Modernising the Labour Party: Organisational Change Since 1983 191 (2004). In any event, the “Prussian discipline” ultimately backfired, with backbench MPs becoming somewhat more independent. See Cowley, Philip, The Rebels (2005).Google Scholar
93 See Shaw, Eric, The Labour Party Since 1945 202 (1994).Google Scholar
94 See Russell, Meg, Building New Labour: The Politics of Party Organisation 282–83 (2005).Google Scholar
95 See Marquand, David, Progressive or Populist? The Blair Paradox, in The Progressive Dilemma: From Lloyd George to Blair 225–46 (David Marquand ed., 1999).Google Scholar
96 Ludlam, Steve & Smith, Martin, Governing as New Labour: Policy and Politics Under Blair 126 (2004).Google Scholar
97 See Mair, , supra note 90, at 26.Google Scholar
98 Id. at 27.Google Scholar
99 See Arend Lijphart, Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries (1984).Google Scholar
100 See Nicol, Danny, Professor Tomkins' House of Mavericks, 2006 Pub. L. 467. Cf. Adam Tomkins, Professor Tomkins' House of Mavericks: A Reply, 2007 Pub. L. 33.Google Scholar
101 See Driver, & Martell, , supra note 78, at 2–3.Google Scholar
102 See Hayek, Friedrich, Law, Legislation and Liberty ch. 18 (1982).Google Scholar
103 See generally Kogan, David & Kogan, Maurice, The Battle for the Labour Party (1982).Google Scholar
104 The Labour leadership of the 1980s and 1990s did not share the respect of the Attlee generation for the Party's internal structures and delegate democracy, which was itself a reaction against the experiences of MacDonaldism. See Minkin, Lewis, The Labour Party Conference 277 (1980).Google Scholar
105 See Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement 1 (1999).Google Scholar
106 Griffith, John, The Political Constitution, 42 Mod. L. Rev. 1, 19 (1979).Google Scholar
107 Ewing, Keith, The Politics of the British Constitution, 2000 Pub. L. 405, 436.Google Scholar
108 See Nicol, , supra note 2, at ch. 1.Google Scholar
109 See Foley, Michael, The Politics of the British Constitution 286 (1999). See also Nicol, Danny, The Legal Constitution: United Kingdom Parliament and European Court of Justice, 5 J. Legis. Stud. 135 (1999).Google Scholar
110 See Ewing, , supra note 107, at 405, 436.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by