No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
1 It was this first case filed against German banks (and it turned out to be the last to be settled as Judge Kram of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York) that almost brought the Agreement between German industry and the German and US governments to falter. The case was finally terminated on 17 May 2001, see: http://laws.findlaw.com/2nd/013017.html (visited 25 June 2004).Google Scholar
2 57 F. Supp.2d 248, 1999 U.S. Dist. Lexis 13864; compare Safferling, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1922 (2000) and Reinisch, IPRax 32 (2000).Google Scholar
3 Juristische Rundschau 6 (2002), reprinted in the reviewed book on p. 233.Google Scholar
4 57 F. Supp.2d 248, 1999 U.S. Dist. Lexis 13864; see in the book at p. 208–209 and p. 237.Google Scholar
5 BGBl. II 1953, 338.Google Scholar
6 See, in the reviewed book p. 238–244.Google Scholar
7 Foundation Law of 2 August 2000, BGBl. I 2000, 1263.Google Scholar
8 Supra, note 5.Google Scholar
9 Adler, and Zumbansen, , in the reviewed book at p. 392.Google Scholar
10 Compare, e.g., the book by Peer's future colleague at Osgoode Hall Law School, C. Scott, Torture as Tort. Comparative Perspectives on the Development of Transnational Human Rights Litigation (2001).Google Scholar
You have
Access