Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T22:09:00.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Outrageous Hunters: Does Headhunting Violate Business Standards?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Andreas Maurer

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the last few years the German courts have had to face several cases in which companies — especially from the IT-sector — filed lawsuits against “headhunters.” “Headhunters” in this context are (usually) executive consultants who try to poach personnel from other companies by simply calling them and asking whether or not they want to change companies. Since skilled and qualified workers and employees are desperately but often unsuccessfully searched by innumerable German companies on the domestic and most recently also the European and international job-market, the methods of poaching have reached and sometimes crossed the borders of unfair practices. The courts faced with these cases had to draw these borders, a process this article attempts to outline.

Type
Research Article
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 2 , Issue 17 , 2001 , E7
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

(1) Even the German state supports the companies? efforts to recruit skilled and specialized foreign IT-personnel with the German “Green Card” regulations (Verordnung ueber die Arbeitsgenehmigung fuer hoch qualifizierte ausländische Fachkräfte der Informations-und Kommunikationstechnologie published on 11 July 2000 [BUNDESGESETZBLATT I 2000, p. 1146 seq.]; Verordnung über Aufenthaltserlaubnisse fuer hoch qualifizierte auslaendische Fachkräfte der Informations-und Kommunikationstechnologie published on 11 July 2000 [BUNDESGESETZBLATT I 2000 p. 1176 seq.]). With this “Green Card” foreign IT-specialists can receive a temporary employment permit.Google Scholar

(2) Reufels, Neue Fragen der wettbewerbsrechtlichen Beurteilung von “Headhunting,” GEWERBLICHER RECHTSSCHUTZ UND URHEBERRECHT, p. 214, 215 (2001).Google Scholar

(3) Landgericht (Regional Court) Heilbronn, Decision of 21/05/1999, reg. no.: 1 KfH 152/99, published in: NEUE JURISTISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT-RECHTSPRECHUNGS REPORT, 1999, p. 1567 et seq; the decision can also be found under: http://www.jupc.de/rechtspr/20010045.htm (last visited 18 October 2001).Google Scholar

(4) Id at p. 1568.Google Scholar

(5) Oberlandesgericht (Higher Regional Court) Stuttgart, Decision of 17 December 1999, reg.no.: 2 U 133/99, published in BETRIEBS BERATER 2000, p. 633–635.Google Scholar