Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:44:10.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Opening the Ranks of Constitutional Subjects: Immigration, Identity, and Innovation in Italy and Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relationship between immigration and constitutional identity is simultaneously obvious and evasive. This Article explores that relationship through a comparative case study of Italy and Canada. It begins with a conceptual analysis of the role of immigration against the backdrop of collective identity, constitutional identity, and constitutional subjectivity. The metaphor of immigration as a mirror of constitutional identity orients this analysis. Then, an empirical comparison of the role of immigration in Italy and Canada demonstrates the very different place of immigration in national and constitutional narratives of “self” and “other.” Yet, when the lens is widened to include their recent startup visa programs, their narratives start to converge as the new metonymy of innovation makes an appearance. This convergence marks a conceptual shift in constitutional identity: From immigration as mirror to immigration as display. As a tool of attraction for innovators, immigration law has both internal and external dimensions, which reverberate with implications for constitutional identity. Ultimately, the startup visa programs enlarge the constitutional “us” and make constitutional subjectivity more fluid.

Type
Special Issue Constitutional Identity in the Age of Global Migration
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by German Law Journal, Inc. 

References

1 For a few eminent samples between law and sociology, see Joppke, Christian, Citizenship and Immigration (2010); Gerald Neuman, Strangers to the Constitution: Immigrants, Borders and Fundamental law (1996); T. Alexander Aleinikoff, Semblances of Sovereignty (2002).Google Scholar

2 See Orgad, Liav, The Cultural Defense of Nations: A Liberal Theory of Majority Rights 86 (2015).Google Scholar

3 Id. at 86.Google Scholar

4 See id. at 131.Google Scholar

5 Bernhard Giesen, National Identity and Citizenship: The Cases of Germany and France, in European Citizenship Between National Legacies and Postnational Projects 41 (Klaus Eder & Bernard Giesen eds., 2001).Google Scholar

6 Michel Rosenfeld, Constitutional identity, in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional law 757 (Michel Rosenfeld & András Sajó eds., 2012) [hereinafter Rosenfeld, OUP]. See also Gary Jeffrey Jacobsohn, Constitutional Identity 7 (2010), arguing that the “constitution acquires an identity through experience” and “identity emerges dialogically”.Google Scholar

7 See id. Google Scholar

9 See Rosenfeld, Michel, The Identity of the Constitutional Subject: Selfhood, Citizenship, Culture and Community 12, 26 (2010) [hereinafter Rosenfeld, The Identity].Google Scholar

10 See Benhabib, Seyla, On Michel Rosenfeld's The Identity of the Constitutional Subject, 33 Cardozo L. Rev. 1889, 1890 (2012); Rosenfeld, OUP, supra note 6, at 757.Google Scholar

11 See Loughlin, Martin, The Concept of Constituent Power, 13 (2) Eur. J. Pol. Theory 1 (2013); see also Rosenfeld, OUP, supra note 6, at 149–83.Google Scholar

12 Rosenfeld, The Identity, supra note 9, at 10.Google Scholar

13 Id. at 26.Google Scholar

14 See id. at 41.Google Scholar

15 See id. at 36.Google Scholar

16 See id. at 59–60.Google Scholar

17 See id. at 59–64.Google Scholar

18 See id. Google Scholar

19 See Orgad, supra note 2.Google Scholar

20 See Orgad, supra note 2, at 85–131 (paying particular attention to page 130); see also Joppke, supra note 1, at 147; see generally A Redefinition of Belonging? Language and Integration Tests in Europe (Ricky van Oers et al. eds., 2010); Ricky Van Oers, Deserving Citizenship—Citizenship Tests in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom (2013).Google Scholar

21 Orgad, supra note 2, at 99–100.Google Scholar

22 See id. at 101, 106–08.Google Scholar

23 See id. at 90.Google Scholar

24 See id. at 130–31; Joppke, supra note 1, at 111, 130.Google Scholar

25 Id. at 87.Google Scholar

26 On the narration of national identity and peoplehood, see Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (3d ed., 2006); Roger Smith, Stories of Peoplehood: The Politics and Morals of Political Membership 5 (2003); Joppke, supra note 1, at 120.Google Scholar

27 See, e.g., Zincone, Giovanna, Citizenship Policy Making in Mediterranean States: Italy, EUDO Citizenship Observatory 1, 6 (2010), http://eudo-citizenship.eu/docs/EUDOcom-Italy.pdf; see also Weil, Patrick & Spire, Alexis, France, in 2 Acquisition and Loss of Nationality: Country Analysis: Policies and Trends in Fifteen European Countries 198 (Rainer Bauböck et al. eds., 2006).Google Scholar

28 See Bosniak, Linda, The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership (2008); Catherine Dauvergne, Making People Illegal: What Globalization means for migration and law 123 (2008).Google Scholar

29 Orgad, supra note 2, at 86.Google Scholar

30 See id. at 87–131.Google Scholar

31 See Motomura, Hiroshi, Looking for Immigration Law, 38 Ethnic & Racial Stud. 1305, 1308 (2015).Google Scholar

32 About 27 million Italians left between 1876 and 1988. Of these, 12–14 million never returned. See Golini, Antonio & Amato, Flavia, Uno Sguardo a un Secolo e Mezzo di Emigrazione Italiana, in Storia dell'Emigrazione Italiana 45, 48 (Piero Bevilacqua et al. eds., 2001); see also Zincone, Giovanna & Basili, Marzia, Country Report: Italy, EUDO Citizenship Observatory 1, 6 (2013), http://eudo-citizenship.eu/docs/CountryReports/Italy.pdf.Google Scholar

33 See Pastore, Ferruccio, A Community out of Balance: Nationality Law and Migration Politics in the History of Post-Unification Italy, 9 J. Mod. It. Stud. 27, 27 (2004).Google Scholar

34 See Zincone, supra note 32, at 10.Google Scholar

35 See L. n. 555/1912 (It.); Pastore, supra note 33, at 29.Google Scholar

36 See L. n. 91/1992 (It.).Google Scholar

37 See id. art. 11.Google Scholar

38 See id. art. 1; see also Zincone, supra note 32, at 10.Google Scholar

39 See Zincone, supra note 32, at 11.Google Scholar

40 See L. n. 459/2001 (It.); see also Pastore, supra note 33, at 35–36.Google Scholar

41 The term is the author's translation of 'Italianità“ as used in Sabina Donati, A Political History of National Citizenship and Identity in Italy 1861–1950, 7093 (2013).Google Scholar

42 The resident foreign population increased from 648,000 in 1991, to 1.3 million in 2002 to 5 million in 2016. Italian National Institute for Statistics, Population in Italy, ISTAT (Jun. 2, 2016), https://www.istat.it/en/files/2017/06/2.pdf. See also Pastore, supra note 33, at 28.Google Scholar

43 See L. n. 91/92 (It.), art. 4(2), art. 9(1)(f). For an overview of ius soli rules under the 1992 Citizenship Act, see Nascimbene, Bruno, Proposte di Riforma delle Norme Sulla Cittadinanza, 2 Rivista di diritto internazionale 555–64 (2004).Google Scholar

44 See id. at 557; see also Zincone, supra note 32, at 15.Google Scholar

45 See Zincone, supra note 32, at 16–17.Google Scholar

46 See Senato, Atto, n. 2092, http://www.senato.it/leg/17/BGT/Schede/Ddliter/46079.htm-; see also Bazzucchi, Maura, Senato, torna lo ius soli ed è già rissa. Salvini: “Bloccheremo il Parlamento”, Politica (July 4, 2017), http://www.huffingtonpost.it/2017/07/04/senato-torna-lo-ius-soli-ed-e-gia-rissa-salvini-bloccheremo_a_23015890/.Google Scholar

47 For instance, in terms of access to education and healthcare. For an overview, see Zincone, Giovanna, The Making of Policies: Immigration and Immigrants in Italy, 32 J. Ethn. & Mig. Stud. 347 (2006); see also Interno, Ministero Dell, Primo Rapporto sugli Immigrati in Italia 26–39 (2007), http://www1.interno.gov.it/mininterno/export/sites/default/it/assets/files/15/0673_Rapporto_immigrazione_BARBAGLI.pdf.Google Scholar

48 See D. Lgs. n. 286/1998 (It.).Google Scholar

49 See id. art. 3, para. 4.Google Scholar

50 See, e.g. id. art. 10, art. 12.Google Scholar

51 See id. art. 28–30, 34–41.Google Scholar

52 See id. art. 2.Google Scholar

53 Art. 3, par. 3 also includes among the objectives of immigration policy the one of favoring the reintegration of migrants in the countries of origin.Google Scholar

54 See, e.g., Italian Ministry of the Interior, Memorandum K.60.1 of 5 January 2007 (Jan. 5, 2007), http://www.meltingpot.org/IMG/pdf/circolare_ministero_interno_citadinanza_-_linee_interpretative.pdf.Google Scholar

55 Consiglio di Stato, n. 3006/2011 (It.); Consiglio di Stato, n. 4080/2009 (It.).Google Scholar

56 See L. n. 94/2009, amending D. Lgs. n. 286/1998 (It.). See also D. Lgs. n. 286/1998, art. 4; see also Ministry of the Interior, Integration Agreement, http://www.integrazionemigranti.gov.it/en/latest-news/highlights/Pages/Integration-agreement.aspx (last visited Jun. 8, 2017).Google Scholar

57 Zincone, supra note 32, at 1.Google Scholar

58 See, e.g., Costituzione [Cost.] [Constitution] (It.), art. 3 and 4 (covering rights intended for ‘citizens'); cf. Costituzione [Cost.] [Constitution] (It.) arts 19, 21, 24 (providing that fundamental rights extended to ‘everyone').Google Scholar

But see Corte Costituzionale, 15 Novembre 1967, n.120, Racc. uff. corte. cost. 1967 (It.) (stating that the principle of equality under art. 3 should apply to foreigners as it is a fundamental liberty).Google Scholar

59 See Cost. (It.), art. 10. For an overview of the status of foreigners under Italian law, see Nascimbene, Bruno, la condizione giuridica dello straniero (2004); francesca biondi dal monte, dai diritti sociali alla cittadinanza: la condizione giuridica dello straniero tra ordinamento italiano e prospettive sovranazionali (2013); cecilia corsi, lo Stato e lo Straniero (2001).Google Scholar

60 It remains “eclectic” in this respect. See Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, National and European Citizenship: The Italian Case in Historical Perspective, 7 (1) Citizenship Stud. 85, 98 (2003).Google Scholar

61 Corte Costituzionale, 10 Febbraio 1994, n. 62, Racc. uff. corte. cost. 1994 (It.).Google Scholar

62 Corte Costituzionale, 19 Giugno 1969, n. 104, Racc. uff. corte. cost. 1969 (It.).Google Scholar

63 See Dauvergne, Catherine, The New Politics of Immigration and the End of Settler Societies (2016).Google Scholar

64 Id. at 11.Google Scholar

65 Immigration Act 1869, S.C. 1869, c. 10 (Can.).Google Scholar

66 David Fitzgerald & David Cook-Martin, Culling the Masses: The Democratic Origins of Racist Immigration Policy in the Americas (2014).Google Scholar

67 On the growth imperative, see Ninette Kelley & M.J. Trebilcock, The Making of the Mosaic: A History of Canadian Immigration Policy 12 (2d ed. 2010); Triadafilos Triadafilopoulos, Becoming Multicultural: Immigration and the Politics of Membership in Canada and Germany 2–5 (2013).; Dauvergne, supra note 63. But see id. Google Scholar

68 See Dauvergne, supra note 63, at 19.Google Scholar

69 Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 (Can.).Google Scholar

70 Note that these types of individual behaviors were already prohibited through other means—this was a rhetorical statement.Google Scholar

71 See Adams, Eric M., Canadian Constitutional Identities, 38 (2) Dalhousie L.J. 311, 333 (2015). (“[I]n 1946, Canada enacted its first Canadian Citizenship Act, as an expression of its growing sense of national distinctiveness and identity.”).Google Scholar

72 Citizenship Act, R.S.C 1985, ch. C-29, § 5 (Can.).Google Scholar

73 Statistics Canada, Obtaining Canadian Citizenship (2011), http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-010-x/99-010-x2011003_1-eng.cfm (last visited Oct. 24, 2017).Google Scholar

74 See Citizenship & Immigration Canada, Discover Canada: The Rights and Responsibilities of Citizenship (2012), http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/pub/discover.pdf. Note that the current government retained almost all of these changes.Google Scholar

75 The former Minister of Citizenship & Immigration and the former Prime Minister both made public statements about upholding the Canadian values of openness and transparency. Former Minister Jason Kenney characterized citizenship as “a quintessentially public act” that must be taken openly. See Smith, Joanna, Muslim Women Must Show Face to Become Canadian Citizens, Toronto Star (Dec. 12, 2012), http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2011/12/12/muslim_women_must_show_face_to_become_canadian_citizens (last visited Oct. 24, 2017) (“[The ban was] … a matter of deep principle that goes to the heart of our identity and our values of openness and equality.”); Morgan Lowrie, Harper Says Ottawa Will Appeal Ruling Allowing Veil During Citizenship Oath, Globe and Mail (Feb. 12, 2015), https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/harper-says-ottawa-will-appeal-ruling-allowing-veil-during-citizenship-oath/article22979142/?ref=http://www.theglobeandmail.com; (providing a statement by Prime Minister Stephen Harper that “[t]his is a society that is transparent, open and where people are equal”).Google Scholar

76 See Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act, S.C. 2014, ch. 22, § 10 (Can.).Google Scholar

77 George Lakoff & Mark Johnson, Metaphors We Live By (2003).Google Scholar

78 Dauvergne, supra note 63, at 20. The new online Express Entry system, closely tied to the labor market, reconfigures the points system into its threshold qualifications.Google Scholar

79 See Act, Constitution, 1867, 30 & 31 Vict., ch. 3 (U.K.), reprinted in R.S.C. 1985, app II, no 5, §§ 91, 95 (Can.).Google Scholar

80 See Union Colliery Co. of British Columbia, Ltd. et al. v. John Bryden [1899] UKPC 58, [1899] AC 580 (PC) (appeal taken from B.C.); see also Ryder, Bruce, Racism and the Constitution: The Constitutional Fate of British Columbia Anti-Asian Immigration Legislation, 1884–1909, 29 Osgoode Hall L. J. 621 (1991). Because provincial legislation was discriminatory against Chinese laborers, placing them under federal jurisdiction improved their condition. This was specifically accomplished by understanding them to have the full rights of citizenship.Google Scholar

81 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act, 1982, c. 11 (U.K.), §§ 2-24. In section 6(1), the Charter explicitly articulates the distinction between citizens and others, stating: “Every citizen of Canada has the right to enter, remain in, and leave Canada.” (emphasis added).Google Scholar

82 See Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v. Chiarelli, [1992] 1 S.C.R 711, [1992] S.C.J No. 27 (Can.), stating: “[N]on-citizens do not have an unqualified right to enter or remain in the country” at 733; Hilewitz v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 SCC 57, [2005] 2 S.C.R 706 (Can.); Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9, [2007] 1 S.C.R 350 (Can.).Google Scholar

83 The United States has had for a longer time an immigrant (EB5) and non-immigrant (E) investor scheme. The US policy in this sense predates the wave of programs adopted as part of the “race for talent.” See, e.g., Strumia, Francesca, New Generation Skilled Migration Policies and the Changing Fabric of Membership: Talent as Output and the Headhunting State, Investment Migration Council, Working Paper 2016/4 (2016); Ayelet Shachar, Picking Winners: Olympic Citizenship and the Global Race for Talent, 120 Yale L. J. 2088 (2011).Google Scholar

84 See, e.g., Malta Individual Investor Programme, Legal Notice 47/2014 (2014), http://iip.gov.mt/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/LN-47-2014.pdf; see also Dzankic, Jelena, The Pros and Cons of Ius Pecuniae: Investor Citizenship in Comparative Perspective, EUDO Citizenship Observatory, EUI Working Paper No. 2012/14 (2012).Google Scholar

85 Francesca Strumia has been involved in advising the Italian Ministry of Economic Development on a pro bono basis on the startup visa policy.Google Scholar

86 See L. n. 221/2012 (It.).Google Scholar

87 See Act, Immigration, supra note 48, art. 26. For further implementation measures in respect of Italian self-employment visas, see D.P.R. n. 394/1999 (It.), art. 39.Google Scholar

88 Strumia, supra note 83, at 16.Google Scholar

89 See Italian Ministry of Economic Development, Italia Startup Visa Guidelines, MISE 13 (May 19, 2017), http://italiastartupvisa.mise.gov.it/media/documents/Guidelines%20ISV%20ENG%2019_05_2017%20fin.pdf [hereinafter Italia Startup Visa Guidelines]. Google Scholar

90 Decisions are made within thirty days of submission, compared with the self-employment visa decisions which are made within 120 days. See Act, Immigration, supra note 48, art. 26.Google Scholar

91 See Italia Startup Visa Guidelines, supra note 89.Google Scholar

92 See Immigration Act supra note 48, art. 26; D.P.R. n. 394/1999, art. 39.Google Scholar

93 See Immigration Act supra note 48, art. 27.Google Scholar

94 Italia Startup Visa Guidelines, supra note 89, at 22.Google Scholar

95 Id. at 3.Google Scholar

96 There is no exception for startup visa holders to the requirement of art. 4bis of the Immigration Act.Google Scholar

97 Italia Startup Visa Guidelines, supra note 89, at 4.Google Scholar

98 Maura Rodgers, Drawing Entrepreneurs to Canada, BCBusiness (Apr. 4, 2011), https://www.bcbusiness.ca/drawing-entrepreneurs-to-canada; Boris Wertz, Mission Accomplished: Startup Visa Canada is Here VersionOne Blog (Jan. 24, 2013), http://versionone.vc/startup-visa-canada-is-here/ (last visited Oct. 24, 2017).Google Scholar

99 Andre Garber & Kailin Che, Canada's StartUp Visa Program for Entrepreneurs, CABI (Oct. 28, 2016), http://www.cabi.ca/articles/canadas-startup-visa-program-for-entrepreneurs; Harjit Grewal, Canada Start Up Google Scholar

Visa: Get Accepted into a Canadian Business Incubator and Secure a Work Permit in 7 Days, Sterling Immigration Blog, http://www.sterlingimmigrationltd.com/startup-visa/canada-startup-visa-get-accepted (last visited Oct. 24, 2017).Google Scholar

100 Ministerial Instructions Respecting the Startup Business Class (May 23, 2015) C. Gaz, Part I, 149/21, http://gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2015/2015-05-23/pdf/g1-14921.pdf, at sch. 1-3.Google Scholar

101 Id. Google Scholar

102 See Robinson, Renee, The Startup Visa Program: Wooing International Technology Entrepreneurs, Canadian Media Fund Blog (Jul. 18, 2013), http://trends.cmf-fmc.ca/blog/the-startup-visa-program-wooing-international-technology-entrepreneurs.Google Scholar

103 See, e.g., Italian Ministry of Economic Development and Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Why Italy?, http://italiastartupvisa.mise.gov.it/#Why_Italy (last visited Jun. 8, 2017).Google Scholar

104 Citizenship & Immigration Canada, The Canadian Advantage (2015), http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/pub/startup-entrepreneurs-eng.pdf; Citizenship & Immigration Canada, Canada Wants Entrepreneurs! (2015), http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/publications/entrepreneurs.asp.Google Scholar

105 Id. Google Scholar

106 1 23 visas have actually been issued, as some beneficiaries have changed their plans – but the numbers have been increasing constantly in any case. See Italian Ministry of Economic Development, Italia Startup Visa & Hub—1st Quarterly Report 2017 4 (2017).Google Scholar

107 The startup visa pilot is in its fourth year and it remains to be seen whether the government will renew it.Google Scholar

108 Startup Visa Continues to Grow, Government of Canada (May 5, 2016), https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/2016/05/startup-visa-continues-to-grow.html (last visited Oct. 24, 2017).Google Scholar

109 See Strumia, supra note 83, at 28.Google Scholar