Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:41:27.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nurturing Commitment in the Legal Profession: Student Experiences with the Osgoode Public Interest Requirement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Janet Leiper

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

“Eye-opening,” “disheartening,” and “inspiring” are some of the words used by law students who met in 2008–2009 to discuss their mosaic of experience in the field doing public interest work. These students had returned from placements under the first mandatory public interest requirement to be introduced in a Canadian law school (the Osgoode Public Interest Requirement, OPIR). OPIR arose from questions about the relationship between what is learned in law school and what is required to be a professional. Academics have challenged each other to do more to instill an “ethos of professionalism” during law school. Others have suggested that law students who do not receive exposure to the world outside the walls of the law school carry an “idealized conception of the profession” and are often unaware of the many practice contexts available to them. Others have warned that if ethical and professional responsibilities are not modeled and articulated for students, that teaching only the “law of lawyering” does not prepare students for becoming ethical lawyers. Teacher-educator Lee Shulman has bluntly accused law schools of “failing miserably” at connecting its lessons in how to “think like a lawyer” with how to “act like a lawyer.” For years, there have been similar concerns raised about the decline of professionalism among lawyers, both in Canada and in the U.S. A survey of Osgoode graduates revealed that students wanted more opportunities to engage with the community and to experience non-traditional forms of law practice. Osgoode Hall Law School grappled with many of these questions, and in 2007 it approved changes to the curriculum, including a new first year Ethics course (Ethical Lawyering in a Global Community, ELGC) and OPIR. In addition to the more traditional first year mandatory course load, Osgoode Hall law students must also complete ELGC, a minimum of 40 hours of public interest work and then engage in a discussion or written exercise reflecting on their experiences. These reflections are a valuable lens for seeing the profession and the administration of justice through the eyes of first and second year law students. Their experiences remind us in the profession that learning can flow in both directions.

Type
Section 5: ‘Is More More?’ Thinking about Student Organization, Government and Community
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 10 , Issue 6-7: Following the Call of the Wild: The Promises and Perils of Transnationalizing Legal Education , July 2009 , pp. 1087 - 1094
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Student Discussion Session, 30 March 2009.Google Scholar

2 The Osgoode Public Interest Requirement (OPIR) was implemented in September 2007. The first Canadian program of its kind, OPIR requires all graduating law students to complete 40 hours of public interest, law related, uncompensated work and participate in a reflection of notions of professionalism, access to justice and the public interest after completing their hours. The student discussion sessions are moderated discussions which continue working with concepts introduced to students during their first year of law school during the Ethical Lawyering in a Global Community Course.Google Scholar

3 Montgomery, John E., Incorporating Emotional Intelligence Concepts into Legal Education: Strengthening the Professionalism of Law Students 30 University of Toledo Law Review 323. Professor Montgomery, former Dean of University of S. Carolina School of Law proposes a continuum of professional education beginning in law school which intentionally incorporates a stronger “Ethos of Professionalism.”Google Scholar

4 Lupica, Lois R., Professional Responsibility Redesigned: Sparking a Dialogue Between Students and the Bar, 29 Journal of the Legal Profession 71, 74.Google Scholar

5 Liz Curran, Judith Dickson & Noone, Mary Anne, Pushing the Boundaries or Preserving the Status Quo? Designing Clinical Programs to Teach Law Students a Deep Understanding of Ethical Practice, 8 International Journal of Clinical Legal Education 104, 105.Google Scholar

6 Shulman, Lee, The Signature Pedagogies of the Professions of Law, Medicine, Engineering and the Clergy: Potential Lessons for the Education of Teachers paper delivered at the Math Sciences Workshop: “Teacher Education for Effective Teaching and Learning”. National Research Council and Centre for Education, Irvine, California, 2005.Google Scholar

7 See for example: “In the Spirit of Public Service:” A Blueprint for the Rekindling of Lawyer Professionalism, 112 F.R.D. 243 (1986), available at: <http://www.abanet.org/cpr/professionalism/Stanley_Commission_Report.pdf> last accessed 14 June 2009; cited in supra note 3. at 324.; Justice Rosalie Abella, Speech to Law Society of Upper Canada Bencher's Retreat, “Professionalism Revisited” 14 October 1999; Justice Coulter Osborne, Civil Justice Reform Project, November 2007; Justice Stephen Goudge, Goodman Lecture at the Chief Justice of Ontario's Symposium of Lifelong Learning in Professionalism, 20 February 2009, Toronto.+last+accessed+14+June+2009;+cited+in+supra+note+3.+at+324.;+Justice+Rosalie+Abella,+Speech+to+Law+Society+of+Upper+Canada+Bencher's+Retreat,+“Professionalism+Revisited”+14+October+1999;+Justice+Coulter+Osborne,+Civil+Justice+Reform+Project,+November+2007;+Justice+Stephen+Goudge,+Goodman+Lecture+at+the+Chief+Justice+of+Ontario's+Symposium+of+Lifelong+Learning+in+Professionalism,+20+February+2009,+Toronto.>Google Scholar

8 Osgoode Hall Law School, Making a Difference in Plan For the Law School, 22 (2006), available at: http://www.osgoode.yorku.ca/about/documents/plan_for_the_law_school_2006-2010.pdf last accessed June 14, 2009.Google Scholar

9 Bain, Ken, What the Best College Teachers Do, 26–27 (2004).Google Scholar

10 Shulman, Lee, Pedagogies of Uncertainty Liberal Education 18, 22 (Spring 2005).Google Scholar

11 Supra, note 3 at 331, 349.Google Scholar

12 Juergens, Ann, Practicing What We Teach: The Importance of Emotion and Community Connection in Law Work and Law Teaching 11 Clinical Law Review 413.Google Scholar

13 Schlitz, Patrick J., Legal Ethics in Decline: The Elite Law Firm, the Elite Law School & the Moral Foundation of the Novice Attorney 82 Minnesota Law Review 705 (1998), cited in Patrick J. Schlitz, Making Ethical Lawyers 45 South Texas Law Review 875, 877.Google Scholar