Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:03:16.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Lisbon Case: A Critical Summary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Christian Wohlfahrt

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of this casenote is to depict the essential content of the German Federal Constitutional Court's Lisbon Case. Therefore, it is of mainly descriptive nature. It primarily addresses readers wishing for a brief overview before approaching the decision itself or particularly those who might like to avoid reading the ruling in its exuberant length. In order to keep this a straightforward contribution, large parts of the judgment had to be set aside and certain necessary simplifications had to be undertaken. I acknowledge these and commend readers to the other contributions in this special collection of the German Law Journal for varied and deeper treatments of the case.

Type
Special Section: The Federal Constitutional Court's Lisbon Case
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 10 , Issue 8 , 01 August 2009 , pp. 1277 - 1286
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/08 from 30 June 2009, available at: http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.Google Scholar

2 Id. at paras. 173, 208.Google Scholar

3 Id. at para. 179.Google Scholar

4 Id. at para. 211.Google Scholar

5 See Bogdandy, Armin von, Das Leitbild der dualistischen Legitimation für die europäische Verfassungsentwicklung, 83 Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft 284, 287 (2000).Google Scholar

6 Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 262, available at: http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.Google Scholar

7 Id. at para. 266.Google Scholar

8 Id. at para. 272.Google Scholar

9 Id. at para. 275.Google Scholar

10 Id. at para. 278.Google Scholar

11 Id. at para. 284.Google Scholar

12 Id. at para. 286.Google Scholar

13 Id. at para. 280.Google Scholar

14 Id. at paras. 274 and 286.Google Scholar

15 BVerfGE 89, 155 (184).Google Scholar

16 Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 294, available at: http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.Google Scholar

17 Id. at para 292.Google Scholar

18 Id. at para. 113.Google Scholar

19 Id. at para. 216.Google Scholar

20 Id. at para. 219.Google Scholar

21 Id. at para. 225.Google Scholar

22 Id. at para. 225.Google Scholar

23 Id. at para. 219.Google Scholar

24 Id. at para. 228.Google Scholar

25 BVerfGE 89, 155.Google Scholar

26 Id. at 190.Google Scholar

27 Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 229, available at: http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.Google Scholar

28 Id. at para. 231.Google Scholar

29 Id. at para. 275.Google Scholar

30 Id. at para. 345.Google Scholar

31 Id. at para. 344.Google Scholar

32 Id. at para 346.Google Scholar

33 Id. at para 233.Google Scholar

34 Id. at para. 236.Google Scholar

35 Id. at para. 236.Google Scholar

36 Id. at paras 236, 238, 243, 245, 264, 272, 317, 319, 365, 375, 409, 411 and 415.Google Scholar

37 Id. at para. 240.Google Scholar

38 Id. at para. 241.Google Scholar

39 Roman Herzog and Lüder Gerken, Stoppt den Europäischen Gerichtshof, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Sept. 8th, 2008, p. 8.Google Scholar

40 Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 299, available at: http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.Google Scholar

41 Id. at para. 299 and 306.Google Scholar

42 Id. at para. 307.Google Scholar

43 Id. para. 324.Google Scholar

44 Id. at paras. 299 and 329.Google Scholar

45 Id. at paras. 299 and 331.Google Scholar

46 Id. at para. 340.Google Scholar

47 Id. at para. 101.Google Scholar

48 Id. at para. 103.Google Scholar

49 Id. at para. 247.Google Scholar

50 Id. at para. 246.Google Scholar

51 Id. at para. 249.Google Scholar

52 Id. at para. 249.Google Scholar

53 Id. at para. 275.Google Scholar

54 Id. at para. 352.Google Scholar

55 Id. at para. 367.Google Scholar

56 Id. at para. 368.Google Scholar

57 Id. at paras. 370.Google Scholar

58 Id. at para. 381.Google Scholar

59 Id. at para. 392.Google Scholar

60 Id. at para. 304.Google Scholar