1 See www.sfb597.uni-bremen.de.Google Scholar

2 The results of the different projects are summed up in two edited volumes: Transformations of the State? (Stephan Leibfried and Michael Zürn eds., 2005) and Transforming the Golden Age Nation State (Achim Hurrelmann, Stephan Leibfried, Kerstin Martens and Peter Mayer eds., 2007).Google Scholar

3 Previous German Law Journal Special Symposium Issues include “European Constitutionalism” (September 2001); “The Future of Public International Law in Light of the Events of September 11^th“ (October 2001); “The War on Terror – One Year On” (September 2002); “The New Transatlantic Tensions and the Kagan Phenomenon” (September 2003); “Security, Democracy and the Future of Freedom” (May 2004); “Transnational Human Rights Litigation” (December 2004); “A Special Dedication to Jacques Derrida” (January 2005) and two issues on European History and Integration (2006, 2007). In Summer 2008, the German Law Journal will publish a Special Issue dedicated to the English-language publication of Jürgen Habermas’ “The Divided West”. In the Winter of 2008/2009, a Special issue will be produced in collaboration with the Maastricht Journal for European & Comparative Law dedicated to the Correlation between Legal Education Reform and the Evolving Transnational Legal Profession.Google Scholar

4 Sassen, Saskia, The State and Economic Globalization: Any Implications for International Law?, 1 Chi. J. Int'l L. 109 (2000); see also Harm Schepel, The Constitution of Private Governance. Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets (2005), 19-23; Anne-Marie Slaughter, Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks, 39 Government and Opposition 159 (2004)Google Scholar

5 For the debate today, see Leiter, Brian, Legal Realism, in: A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory 261 (Dennis Patterson ed., 1996); and: http://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2006/06/the_socalled_ne.html Google Scholar

6 North, Douglass C., Institutions, 5 J. Econ. Persp. 97 (1991), at 97Google Scholar

7 Id.Google Scholar

8 David, Paul A., Why Are Institutions the ‘Carriers of History’?: Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations and Institutions, 5 Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 205 (1994)Google Scholar

9 Amstutz, Marc, Global (Non-)Law: The Perspective of Evolutionary Jurisprudence, 9 German L. J. (2008) [in this issue]; Paul Pierson, Politics in Time. History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (2004), 133 (stressing the importance of keeping an eye on the long-term development trajectories of institutions rather than stressing ‘change’)Google Scholar

10 E.g., for contract law, see Eric A. Posner, Law and Social Norms (2000), 148; see also the Symposium Issue “Governing Contracts: Public and Private Dimensions”, 14 Ind. J. Glob. Leg. Stud. (2007).Google Scholar

11 Mary Kaldor, Global Civil Society: An Answer to War (2003)Google Scholar

12 Hauke Brunkhorst, Solidarität. Von der Bürgerfreundschaft zur globalen Rechtsgenossenschaft (2002)Google Scholar

13 Luhmann, Niklas, The World Society as a Social System, 8 Int. J. General Systems 131 (1982)Google Scholar

14 Amstutz, , in this issueGoogle Scholar

15 Teubner, Gunther, 'Global Bukowina': Legal Pluralism in the World Society, in: Global Law Without A State 3 (Teubner Ed. 1997)Google Scholar

16 Zumbansen, Peer, Sustaining Paradox Boundaries: Perspectives on the Internal Affairs in Domestic and International Law, 15 European Journal of International Law [EJIL] 197 (2004a)Google Scholar

17 Teubner, Gunther, Dealing With Paradoxes: Luhmann, Wiethölter, Derrida, in: Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in Law 41 (Perez/Teubner Ed. 2006), at 52, with reference to Niklas Luhmann, Law as a Social System (Klaus Ziegert et al. eds., 2004), 459Google Scholar

18 Habermas, Jürgen, The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies [1985], in: The New Conservatism. Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate [ed. and transl. by Shierry Weber Nicholsen] 48 (Habermas Ed. 1989)Google Scholar

19 Posner, E., supra note 10; John Drobek (Ed.), Norms and the Law, 2006Google Scholar

20 Posner, E., supra note 10, at 152: “Courts have trouble understanding the simplest of business relationships.”Google Scholar

21 Id., at 153Google Scholar

22 Id.Google Scholar

23 See only Schanze, Erich, International Standards: Functions and Links to Law, in: Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations 166 (Christian Brütsch and Dirk Lehmkuhl eds., 2007); Helmut Willke, Smart Governance. Governing the Global Knowledge Society (2007)Google Scholar

24 Pierson, Politics in Time, supra, at 133Google Scholar

25 Merry, Sally Engle, Legal Pluralism, 22 Law & Society Review 869 (1988); Berman, Paul Schiff, Global Legal Pluralism, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1155 (2007)Google Scholar

26 Zysman, Jonathan, How institutions create historically rooted trajectories of growth, 3 Industrial and Corporate Change 243 (1994); Bebchuk, Lucian Ayre/Roe, Mark J., A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Governance and Ownership, 52 Stanford Law Review 127 (1999); Licht, Amir N., The Mother of all Path-Dependencies: Towards a Cross-Cultural Theory of Corporate Governance Systems, 26 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 147 (2001); Deeg, Richard, Institutional Change and the Uses and Limits of Path Dependency: The Case of German Finance, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, MPIfG Discussion Paper 01/6 (2001)Google Scholar

27 Hodgson, Geoffrey, Varieties of capitalism and varieties of economic theory, 3 Review of International Political Economy 380 (1996); Soskice, David, Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980's and 1990's, in: Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism 101 (Kitschelt/Lange/Marks/Stephens Ed. 1999); Hall, Peter A./Soskice, David, An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism, in: Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage 1 (Hall/Soskice Ed. 2001)Google Scholar

28 See Beckert, Jens, The Great Transformation of Embeddedness. Karl Polanyi and the New Economic Sociology, Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung/Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Societies, MPIfG Discussion Paper 07/1 (2007); Zumbansen, Peer/Saam, Daniel, The ECJ, Volkswagen and European Corporate Law: Reshaping the European Varieties of Capitalism, 8 German L.J. 1027 (2007) [available here and on SSRN]Google Scholar

29 Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim, Die Wiederkehr der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft und ihres Rechts, 10 Rechtshistorisches Journal 177 (1991); Robert D. Cooter/Thomas Ulen, Law & Economics (4th ed., 2004), 3-7Google Scholar

30 For a discussion of how anti-regulatory politics are recurring in the transnational arena, see e.g. Zumbansen, Peer, Piercing the Legal Veil: Commercial Arbitration and Transnational Law, 8 Eur. L. J. 400 (2002a).Google Scholar

31 See only the brilliant papers by Santos, Alvaro, The World Bank's Uses of the ‘Rule of Law’ Promise in Economic Development, in: The New Law and Economic Development. A Critical Appraisal 253 (Trubek/Santos Ed. 2006), and by Rittich, Kerry, The Future of Law and Development: Second Generation Reforms and the Incorporation of the Social, 26 Michigan J. Int'l L. 199 (2004).Google Scholar

32 Reinhart Koselleck, Critique and Crisis. Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society [1959] (1988), at 158Google Scholar

33 Rittich, Kerry, Functionalism and Formalism: Their latest Incarnations in Contemporary Development and Governance Debates, 55 UTLJ 853 (2005)Google Scholar

34 Niklas Luhmann, Observations on Modernity [1992] (William Whobrey transl., 1998), 2 (regarding Skinner and Koselleck)Google Scholar

35 Martin Herberg, Globalisierung und politische Selbstregulierung (2007), at 231Google Scholar