No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Law and Medicine: Notes on the Meeting of German-Speaking Public Law Assistants in Vienna (2006)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Meetings of German-speaking Public Law assistants have, as was explained in Daniel Thym's report on the Bielefeld meeting in 2005, been a long-standing tradition. Therefore, it is not surprising that the Austrian capital has already seen four meetings of this kind, in 1970, 1981, 1994 and now in 2006. More than 150 Public Law assistants from Germany, Switzerland and (needless to say) Austria convened from 21 to 24 February in order to discuss the implications of the general topic “Law and Medicine”. In accordance with the European idea, the circle of participants was not restricted to assistants coming from those three countries but the organizers had successfully encouraged German-speaking assistants from other EU countries to make contributions. Indeed, European law, in terms of contents, also played a major role.
- Type
- Developments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2006 by German Law Journal GbR
References
1 Thym, Daniel, The European Constitution: Notes on the National Meeting of German Public Law Assistants, 6 German Law Journal No. 4 (1 April 2005) at: http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=593.Google Scholar
2 For further information (including the papers of all presentations), see http://www.assistententagung.at.Google Scholar
3 Eur. Court H.R., Vo v. France, 2004-VIII., paras. 84-85.Google Scholar
4 Case C-377/98, Netherlands v. Parliament and Council, 2001 ECR I-7079, para. 77.Google Scholar
5 Case C-36/02, Omega, 2004 ECR I-9609, para. 37.Google Scholar
6 “… if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action … can … be better achieved by the Community”.Google Scholar
7 In her presentation, Savat avoided to use the term “light version”, which had appeared in her paper (see note 2). Instead, she referred to a possible “de facto competence” of the Community in health matters. In the discussion, however, it was the expression “light version” which attracted most attention.Google Scholar
8 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction.Google Scholar
9 See also Gregor Kirchhof, Kumulative Belastung durch unterschiedliche staatliche Massnahmen, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (2006), 732-736.Google Scholar
10 See Nicole Jacoby, The Decision of the Bundesverfassungsgericht of April 12, 2005 Concerning Police Use of Global Position Systems as a Surveillance Tool, 6 German Law Journal No. 7 (1 July 2005), at: http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=615; Jacqueline Ross, Germany's Federal Constitutional Court and the Regulation of GPS surveillance, 6 German Law Journal No. 12 (1 December 2005), at: http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=678.Google Scholar
11 Directive 2001/20/EC.Google Scholar
12 Eur. Court H.R., Christine Goodwin v. The United Kingdom, 2002-VI; Eur. Court H.R., I v. The United Kingdom, App. No. 25680/94, 11 July 2002.Google Scholar
14 See supra note 2.Google Scholar
15 Elisabeth Dujmovits et al. (Ed.), Recht und Medizin, ISBN 3-8329-1810-8, to be published.Google Scholar
You have
Access