¹ Stuart Hall, The Neoliberal Revolution, Thatcher, Blair, Cameron—The Long March of Neoliberalism Continues, 25 Cult. Stud. 705, 710 (2011).Google Scholar

² Adopting the terminology used in the UN Norms.Google Scholar

³ Rep. of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporation and Other Business Enterprises, Human Rights Policies and Management Practices: Results from Questionnaire Surveys of Governments and Fortune Global 500 Firm, Human Rights Council, U.N. Doc. A/C/4/35/Add.3 (Oct. 28, 2007).Google Scholar

⁴ Michael Addo, The Reality of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 14 Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 133, 135 (2014).Google Scholar

⁵ Marilyn Croser, Human Rights Violations Have Increased 70% Since 2008 Globally, The Guardian (Sept. 9, 2014), http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2014/sep/09/humanrights-violations-increase-corporate-responsibility.Google Scholar

⁶ Jim Yardley, Garment Trade Wields Power in Bangladesh, N.Y. Times (July 24, 2013), http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/25/world/asia/garment-trade-wields-power-in-bangladesh.html?_r=0.Google Scholar

⁷ Amnesty Int'l, Corporations–Corporate Accountability, Amnesty Int'l (Dec. 1, 2014), http://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/corporate-accountability/.Google Scholar

⁸ Verisk Maplecroft, 2016 Human Rights Dataset, Maplecroft (2016), http://maplecroft.com/themes//.Google Scholar

⁹ See inter alia Corporate Codes, Civil Society Guidelines, OECD Guidelines, ILO Tripartite Declarations, and the UN Global Compact. Google Scholar

¹⁰ Melish, Tara J. & Errol Meidinger, Protect, Respect, Remedy and Participate: ‘New Governance’ Lessons for the Ruggie Framework, in The UN Guiding Principles on Business Rights Foundations and Implementations 303, 307 (Radu Mares ed., 2012).Google Scholar

¹¹ Claudio Grossman & Bradlow, Daniel D., Are We Being Propelled Towards a People-Centered Transnational Legal Order?, 9 Am. U. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 1, 8 (1993).Google Scholar

¹² Salomon v. A Solomon & Co. Ltd., [1896] UKHL 1.Google Scholar

¹³ Oxford Pro Bono Publico, Obstacles to justice and redress for victims of corporate human rights abuse 356 (2008), http://www2.law.ox.ac.uk/opbp/Oxford-Pro-Bono-Publico-submission-to-Ruggie-3-Nov-2008.pdf.Google Scholar

¹⁴ See generally Schipani, Cindy A., Infiltration of Enterprise Theory into Environmental Jurisprudence, 22 J. Corp. L. 599 (1997).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Blumberg, Phillip I., The Multinational Challenge to Corporation Law: The Search for a New Corporate Personality 52 (1993).Google Scholar

¹⁶ Surya Deva, Corporate Code of Conduct Bill 2000—Overcoming Hurdles in Enforcing Human Rights Obligations Against Overseas Corporate Hands of Local Corporations, 8 Newc L. Rev. 87, 100 (2004).Google Scholar

¹⁷ Prest v. Petrodel Res. Ltd., [2013] UKSC 34.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁹ Mitchell, Lawrence E., Corporate Irresponsibility: America's Newest Export 53–54 (1st ed. 2001).Google Scholar

²⁰ See generally Peterson, M.J., Bhopal Plant Disaster–Situation Summary, in International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering Case Study Series (2009).Google Scholar

²¹ See generally Hansmann, Henry & Kraakman, Reinier, Toward Unlimited Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts, 100 Yale L. J. 1879 (1991).Google Scholar

²² Sagarika Chakraborty, Transnational Corporations, Other Business Enterprises And Human Rights: The Right Step Toward Corporate Social Responsibility?, Washington College of Law: Business Law Brief (2006), https://www.wcl.american.edu/blr/03/1chakraborty.pdf.Google Scholar

²³ Jean-Phillippe Robé, Multinational Enterprises: The Constitution of a Pluralistic Legal Order, in Global Law Without a State 45, 60–62 (Gunther Teubner ed., 1997).Google Scholar

²⁴ See generally Barrett, Edward L. Jr., The Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens, 35 Calif. L. Rev. 380 (1947).Google Scholar

²⁵ For example: uni-national corporations.Google Scholar

²⁶ See generally Baez, Cristina, Michele Dearing, Margaret Delatour & Christine Dixon, Multinational Enterprises and Human Rights, 8 U. Miami Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 183 (2015).Google Scholar

²⁷ Andrew Clapham, Human Rights in the Private Sphere 61–63 (1996).Google Scholar

²⁸ See generally Sumithra Dhanarajan & Claire Methven O'Brien, The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: A Status Review, NUS Law Working Paper No. 2015/005 (2015).Google Scholar

²⁹ Björn Fasterling & Geert Demuijnck, Human Rights in the Void? Due Diligence in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 116 J. Bus. Ethics 799, 808 (2013).Google Scholar

³⁰ See generally Nolan, Justine, Refining the Rules of the Game: The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights, 30 Utrecht J. of Int'l & Eur. L. 7 (2014).Google Scholar

³¹ Robe, supra note 23, at 64–68.Google Scholar

³² Woods, Jeanne M., A Human Rights Framework for Corporate Accountability, 17 ILSA J. of Int'l & Comp. L. 328, 333 (2012).Google Scholar

³³ Olivier de Schutter, Extraterritorial Jurisdiction as a Tool for Improving the Human Rights Accountability of Transnational Corporation, Business and Human Rights Resource Centre (Dec. 1, 2006), http://business-humanrights.org/en/pdf-extraterritorial-jurisdiction-as-a-tool-for-improving-the-humanrights-accountability-of-transnational-corporations.Google Scholar

³⁴ Rep. of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Impact of the Global Economic & Financial Crises on the Realization of all Human Rights & on Possible Actions to Alleviate it, Human Rights Council, U.N. Doc. A/C/13/38 (Feb. 18, 2010).Google Scholar

³⁵ Peter Utting, Rethinking Business Regulation: From Self-Control to Social Control, Technology, Business and Society Programme Paper No.15, 14–15 (2005).Google Scholar

³⁶ The Special Representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations (SRSG).Google Scholar

³⁷ Promotion and Protection of all Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Including the Rights to Development—Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights, Report of the SRSG, Human Rights Council, U.N. Doc. A/C/8/5 (Apr. 7, 2008) [hereinafter Framework]. Google Scholar

³⁸ Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework, Human Rights Council, U.N. Doc. A/HRC17/31 (Mar. 21, 2011) [hereinafter Guiding Principle(s)]. Google Scholar

³⁹ Human Rights Council Res. 2005/69, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/RES/2005/69 (Apr. 20, 2005).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ John G, Ruggie, Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda, 101 Am. J. of Int'l L. 819, 826 (2007).Google Scholar

⁴¹ Melish & Meidinger, supra note 10, at 306.Google Scholar

⁴² Human Rights Council Res. 8/7, U.N. Doc. A/C/RES/8/7 (June 18, 2008).Google Scholar

⁴³ U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Council Holds Dialogue with Experts on Summary Executions, Independence of Judges and Lawyers, Transnational Corporations, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (May 30, 2011), http://www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=11082&LangID=E.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Robert McQuorcodale, Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law, 87 J. Bus. Ethics 385, 387 (2009).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ For example: International Council on Mining and Metals.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ For example: Amnesty International.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ U.N. Human Rights Council, The UN “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework for Business and Human Rights, (2011), http://www.reports-and-materials.org/sites/default/files/reports-and-materials/Ruggie-protect-respect-remedy-framework.pdf.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ OECD, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (2011).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ ISO, Guidance on social responsibility (2010), http://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:26000:ed-1:v1:en.pdf.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (undated), http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Pages/WGHRandtransnationalcorporationsandotherbusiness.aspx.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Human Rights Council Res. 17/4, U.N. Doc. A/C/RES/17/4 (June 16, 2011).Google Scholar

⁵² See generally Pautz, Jessica A. & Forrer, Donald A., The Dynamics of Groupthink: The Cape Coral Experience, 2 J. of Interprofessional Educ. & Prac. 1 (2013).Google Scholar

⁵³ Surya Deva, Treating Human Rights Lightly: A Critique of the Consensus Rhetoric and the Language Employed by the Guiding Principles, in Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? 78, 81 (Surya Deva & David Bilchitz eds., 2013).Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Addo, supra note 4, at 146.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Fletcher Forum, Business and Human Rights: Together at Last? A Conversation with John Ruggie, 35 The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 117, 120 (2011).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Andreas Rasche, A Necessary Supplement: What the United Nations Global Compact Is and Is Not, 48 Bus. & Soc'y 511, 539 (2009).Google Scholar

⁵⁷ U.N. Global Compact, The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact, United Nations (undated), http://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Amartya Sen, Elements of a Theory of Human Rights, 32 Philos. Pub. Aff. 315, 319–21 (2004).Google Scholar

⁵⁹ H.L.A. Hart, Are There any Natural Rights?, 64 Phil. Rev. 171, 175–76 (1955).Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Eugene Schlossberger, A Holistic Approach to Rights: Affirmative Action, Reproductive Rights 157 (2007).Google Scholar

⁶¹ Hart, supra note 59, at 177.Google Scholar

⁶² Fasterling & Demuijnck, supra note 29, at 802.Google Scholar

⁶³ See generally Carroll, Archie B., A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance, 16 Acad. Mgmt. Rev. 312 (1979).Google Scholar

⁶⁴ See generally Garcia, Frank J., The Global Market and Human Rights: Trading Away the Human Rights Principle, 25 Brook. J. Int'l L. 51 (1999).Google Scholar

⁶⁵ E. Merrick Dodd, For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees?, 45 Harv. L. Rev. 1145, 1155–62 (1932).Google Scholar

⁶⁶ See generally Strassmair, Katharina, The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: The implementation on the international, regional, national and company level (2015).Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Françoise Tulkens, Human Rights, Rhetoric or Reality?, 9 Eur. Rev. 125, 129 (2001).Google Scholar

⁶⁸ See generally Ellis, Anthony, A Deterrence Theory of Punishment, 53 Phil. Q. 337 (2003).Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Morris Ginsberg, On Justice in Society 247 (1971).Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Arun Kumar & Rachana Sharma, Principles Of Business Management 433 (2000).Google Scholar

⁷¹ See generally Hohfeld, Wesley N., Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 4378 (1917).Google Scholar

⁷² See generally Thomas, Tracy A., Ubis Jus, Ibi Remedium: The Fundamental Right to a Remedy, 41 San Diego L. Rev. 1633 (2004).Google Scholar

⁷³ Amnesty International, Major new book calls for radical changes to stop corporate abuses, Amnesty Int'l UK (Mar. 11, 2014) http://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/major-new-book-calls-radical-changes-stop-corporate-abuses.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Wood, D., Retributive and Corrective Justice, Criminal and Private Law (2010), http://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/48-33.pdf.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Caroline Hannah McGill, Zemiology and the dark side of globalisation: the case of Naivasha's cut-flower industry (2012), http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/16180/1/__ddat01_staffhome_bjones_Downloads_53-194-1-PB.pdf.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Kudla v. Poland [2000] 35 All ER 198 at [156].Google Scholar

⁷⁷ For example, EC, UDHR, ICCPR.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Z. v. United Kingdom, [2002] All ER 97 at [108].Google Scholar

⁷⁹ International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, S. Treaty Doc. No. 95–20, 6 I.L.M. 368 (1967), 999 U.N.T.S. 171, Art. 14 [hereinafter ICCPR]. Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Dombo Beheer B.V. v. The Netherlands [1993] 18 EHRR 213 at [33].Google Scholar

⁸¹ Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Nov. 4, 1950, 213 U.N.T.S. 222, Art. 6 [hereinafter ECHR].Google Scholar

⁸² Id. Google Scholar

⁸³ Dinah Shelton, The Jurisprudence of Human Rights Tribunals on Remedies for Human Rights Violations, in Int'l Protection Of Hum. Rts. And Victims' Rts. 57, 59 (J.F. Flauss ed., 2009).Google Scholar

⁸⁴ G.A. Res. 60/147, at Principle 2(c) (Mar. 21, 2006) [hereinafter Reparation Principle].Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Id. at Principle 18.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Scordino v. Italy (No. 1), [2006] ECHR 276 at [93].Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Shelton, supra note 83, at 87.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ See generally Laplante, Lisa J., Just Repair, 48 Cornell Int'l L. J. 513 (2015).Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Ruggie, John G., Opening Statement to United Nations Human Rights Council (2006), http://www.reports-and-materials.org/sites/default/files/reports-and-materials/Ruggie-statement-to-UN-Human-Rights-Council-25-Sep-2006.pdf.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Florian Wettstein, Normativity, Ethics, and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: A Critical Assessment, 14 J. of Hum. Rts. 162, 163 (2015).Google Scholar

⁹¹ Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2 (Aug. 26, 2003) [hereinafter UN Norms]. Google Scholar

⁹² Fasterling & Demuijnck, supra note 29, at 881.Google Scholar

⁹³ Melish & Meidinger, supra note 10, at 308.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Karin Buhmann, Navigating from ‘Train Wreck’ to Being ‘Welcomed’: Negotiation Strategies and Argumentative Patterns in the Development of the UN Framework, in Human Rights Obligations of Business—Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? 29, 29–56 (Surya Deva & David Bilchitz eds., 2013).Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Simon Baughen, Human Rights and Corporate Wrongs, Closing the Governance Gaps 256 (2015).Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Clapham, supra note 27, at 61–63.Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Christiana Ochoa, Advancing the Language of Human Rights in a Global Economic Order: An Analysis of a Discourse, 23 B.C. Third World L.J. 57, 59 (2003).Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Deva, supra note 53, at 91.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Framework, supra note 37, at paragraph 9.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ Guiding Principles, supra note 38 (emphasis added).Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Henry Shue, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy 76 (2nd ed. 1980).Google Scholar

¹⁰² Guiding Principles, supra note 38, Principle 1.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Baughen, supra note 95, at 261.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Astrid Sanders, The Impact of the ‘Ruggie Framework’ and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights on Transnational Human Rights Litigation, LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 18/2014, 8 (2014), https://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/wps/WPS2014-18_Sanders.pdf (emphasis added).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Guiding Principles, supra note 38, Commentary to Principle 11 (emphasis added).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ See generally Kant, Immanuel, Fundamental Principle of the Metaphysics of Morals, in Ethics: The Classic Readings 166 (Cooper, David E. ed., 1998).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ Joel Feinberg, Social Philosophy 58–59 (1973).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Allen Buchanan, Perfecting imperfect Duties: Collective Action to Create Moral Obligations, 6 Bus. Ethics Q. 27, 28 (1996).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ See generally Kant, Immanuel, The groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (1991).Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Corporate Social Responsibility for Human Rights: Comments on the UN Special Representative's Report Entitled “Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights” (2008), http://198.170.85.29/Weil-Gotshal-legal-commentary-on-Ruggie-report-22-May-2008.pdf.Google Scholar

¹¹¹ Guiding Principles, supra note 38, at Principle 11.Google Scholar

¹¹² Framework, supra note 37, at paragraph 54.Google Scholar

¹¹³ Arvind Ganesan, UN Human Rights Council: Weak Stance on Business Standard—Global Rules Needed, Not Just Guidance, Human Rights Watch (June 16, 2011), http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/06/16/un-humanrights-council-weak-stance-business-standards.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ Wettstein, supra note 90, at 169.Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Aaronson, Susan A. & Ian Higham, Re-righting Business: John Ruggie and the Struggle to Develop International Human Rights Standards for Transnational Firms, 35 Hum. Rts. Q. 333, 358 (2013).Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ See generally Gunningham, Neil, Kagan, Robert A. & Dorothy Thornton, Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond Compliance, 29 L. Soc. Inquirer 308 (2004).Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law 92 (1997).Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Yadong Luo & Tung, Rosalie L., International Expansion of Emerging Market Enterprises: A Springboard Perspective, 38 J Int'l Bus. Stud. 481, 497 (2007).Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ McQuorcodale, supra note 44, at 392.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Dan Levin, China Escalating Attack on Google, N.Y. Times (June 2, 2014), http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/03/business/chinas-battle-against-google-heats-up.html?_r=0.Google Scholar

¹²¹ Carloz Lopez, The ‘Ruggie Process’: From Legal Obligations to Corporate Social Responsibility? in Human Rights Obligations of Business—Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? 58, 67 (Surya Deva & David Bilchitz eds., 2013).Google Scholar

¹²² Sunstein, Cass R., Social Norms and Social Rules, 96 Colum. L. Rev. 912, 913 (1996).Google Scholar

¹²³ Patricia Illingworth, Global Need—Rethinking Business Norms, in The Business and Human Rights Landscape: Moving Forward, Looking Back 175, 177 (Jena Martin & Bravo, Karen E. eds., 2015).Google Scholar

¹²⁴ Sunstein, supra note 122, at 914.Google Scholar

¹²⁵ Michael Addo & Jena Martin, The Evolving Business and Society Landscape: Can Human Rights Make a Difference?, in The Business and Human Rights Landscape: Moving Forward, Looking Back 348, 348–49 (Jena Martin & Bravo, Karen E. eds., 2015).Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Anthony D'Amato, Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials: A Reply to Jean d'Aspremont, 20 Eur. J. Int'l L. 897, 899 (2009).Google Scholar

¹²⁷ Chikako Oka, Accounting for the Gaps in Labour Standard Compliance: The Role of Reputation-conscious Buyers in the Cambodian Garment Industry, 22 Eur. J. Dev. Res. 59, 78 (2010).Google Scholar

¹²⁸ Framework, supra note 37, at 16.Google Scholar

¹²⁹ Sally Wheeler, Global production, CSR and Human Rights: The Courts of Public Opinion and the Social Licence to Operate, The Int'l J. of Hum. Rts. 757, 769 (2015); See infra Part D.II.Google Scholar

¹³⁰ Ganesan, supra note 113.Google Scholar

¹³¹ Wheeler, supra note 129, at 770.Google Scholar

¹³² Locke, Richard M., The Promise and Limits of Private Power 157 (2013).Google Scholar

¹³³ Framework, supra note 37, at paragraph 24.Google Scholar

¹³⁴ Guiding Principles, supra note 38, at Principle 13.Google Scholar

¹³⁵ Florian Wettstein, CSR and the Debate on Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Great Divide, 22 Bus. Ethics Q. 739, 753–55 (2012).Google Scholar

¹³⁶ Business & Human Rights Initiative, How to Do Business With Respect for Human Rights: A Guidance Tool for Companies 45 (2010).Google Scholar

¹³⁷ G.A. Res. 217 (III) A, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, U.N. Doc. A/810 at 71 (1948), Art. 5 [hereinafter UDHR].Google Scholar

¹³⁸ Justine Nolan & Luke Taylor, Corporate Responsibility for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Rights in Search of a Remedy?, 87 J. Bus. Ethics 433, 443 (2009).Google Scholar

¹³⁹ International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, S. Treaty Doc. No. 95-19, 6 I.L.M. 360 (1967), 993 U.N.T.S. 3, Art. 7 [hereinafter ICESCR].Google Scholar

¹⁴⁰ Shue, supra note 101, at 62.Google Scholar

¹⁴¹ G.C. Brenkert, Business, Respect, and Human Rights The Third Pillar: Remedies, Reparations, and the Ruggie Principles, in The Business and Human Rights Landscape: Moving Forward, Looking Back 154 (J. Martin & K.E. Bravo eds., Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar

¹⁴² See infra Part D.III.Google Scholar

¹⁴³ Framework, supra note 37, at 24.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁴ Illingworth, supra note 123, at 189.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁵ Wettstein, supra note 90, at 172.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁶ Nolan & Taylor, supra note 139, at 438–39.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁷ Deva, supra note 53, at 95–6.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁸ Constituted by the UDHR, ICCPR, and ICESCR (emphasis added).Google Scholar

¹⁴⁹ Guiding Principles, supra note 38, at Principle 12 (emphasis added).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁰ Framework, supra note 37, at paragraph 52.Google Scholar

¹⁵¹ Ruggie, John G., Interim Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/2006/9, paragraph 55 (Feb. 22, 2006).Google Scholar

¹⁵² Brenkert, supra note 142, at 146.Google Scholar

¹⁵³ Roy Sullivan & Nicolas Hachez, Human Rights Norms for Business: The Missing Piece of the Ruggie Jigsaw-The Case of Institutional Investors, in The UN Guiding Principles on Business Rights Foundations and Implementations 217, 230 (Radu Mares ed., 2012).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁴ Surya Deva, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implications for Companies, 9 Eur. Company L. 101, 108–9 (2012).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁵ Sigrun Skogly, The Human Rights Obligations of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund 68 (2001).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁶ ICESCR, supra note 140, Art. 12.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁷ Surya Deva, Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations—Humanizing Business 116 (2013).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁸ Michael Goodhart, Human Rights and Non-State Actors: Theoretical Puzzles, in Non-State Actors in the Human Rights Universe 23, 34–35 (Andreopoulos, George J., Kabasakal, Zehra F. Arat & Peter Juviler eds., 2006).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁹ Addo & Martin, supra note 125, at 381.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁰ See infra Part C. II.Google Scholar

¹⁶¹ Sullivan & Hachez, supra note 154, at 230.Google Scholar

¹⁶² Larry Catá Backer, From Institutional Misalignments to Socially Sustainable Governance: The Guiding Principles for the Implementation of the United Nation's ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ and the Construction of Inter-systemic Global Governance, Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L. J. 102, 202 (2011).Google Scholar

¹⁶³ Fasterling & Demuijnck, supra note 29, at 801.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁴ See generally Principles, Guiding, supra note 38.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁵ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁶⁶ Id. at Principle 17.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁷ Id. at Principle 22.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁸ Backer, supra note 163, at 202.Google Scholar

¹⁶⁹ See generally International Commission of Jurists, Corporate Accountability, International Human Rights Law and the United Nations (2005).Google Scholar

¹⁷⁰ Perry, Jeffrey S. & Herd, Thomas J., Mergers and Acquisitions: Reducing M&A Risk through Improved Due Diligence, 32 Strategy & Leadership 12, 15 (2012).Google Scholar

¹⁷¹ Jonathan Bonnitcha & Robert McQuorcodale, Is the concept of ‘due diligence‘ in the Guiding Principles coherent? (2013), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2210457.Google Scholar

¹⁷² McQuorcodale, supra note 44, at 391.Google Scholar

¹⁷³ Wheeler, supra note 129, at 763.Google Scholar

¹⁷⁴ Christina Hill & Serena Lillywhite, The United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework: Six Years On and What Impact Has it Had?, 2 The Extractive Industries & Soc'y 4, 5–6 (2015).Google Scholar

¹⁷⁵ Business and Human Rights: Further Steps Toward the Operationalization of the ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework, Human Rights Council, U.N. Doc. A/HRSC/14/27, 16 (Apr. 9, 2010).Google Scholar

¹⁷⁶ J.J. Eluyode, The Notion of Collective Human Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility: Issues and Trends in International Law, 24 Int'l Company & Com. l. Rev. 209, 214 (2013).Google Scholar

¹⁷⁷ James Anaya, Extractive Industries and Indigenous Peoples—Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, U.N. Doc. NA/HRC/24/41 (July 1, 2013).Google Scholar

¹⁷⁸ Peter Muchlinski, Implementing the New UN Corporate Human Rights Framework, 22 Bus. Ethics Q. 145, 161 (2012).Google Scholar

¹⁷⁹ L. J. Dhooge, Due Diligence as a Defense to Corporate Liability Pursuant to the Alien Tort Statute, 22 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 455, 496 (2008).Google Scholar

¹⁸⁰ Fasterling & Demuijnck, supra note 29, at 808–12.Google Scholar

¹⁸¹ James Harrison, Human Rights Measurement: Reflections on the Current Practice and Future Potential of Human Rights Impact Assessment, 3 J. of Hum. Rts. Prac. 162, 172 (2011).Google Scholar

¹⁸² Fasterling & Demuijnck, supra note 29, at 808–12.Google Scholar

¹⁸³ James Harrison, Establishing a Meaningful Human Rights Due Diligence Process For Corporations: Learning From Experience of Human Rights Impact Assessment, 31 Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 107, 112–12 (2013).Google Scholar

¹⁸⁴ Id. (emphasis added).Google Scholar

¹⁸⁵ Wheeler, supra note 129, at 767.Google Scholar

¹⁸⁶ James Harrison, Human Rights and Transnational Corporation: Establishing Meaningful International Obligations, in International Economic Law, Globalization and Developing Countries 205, 214 (Julio Faundez & Celine Tan eds., 2010).Google Scholar

¹⁸⁷ Fasterling & Demuijnck, supra note 29, at 808.Google Scholar

¹⁸⁸ Muchlinski, supra note 179, at 158.Google Scholar

¹⁸⁹ See generally Conley, John M. & Williams, Cynthia A., Engage, Embed and Embellish: Theory versus Practice in the Corporate Social Responsibility Movement, 31 J. Corp. L. 1 (2005).Google Scholar

¹⁹⁰ Norman Jackson & Pippa Carter, Organizational Chiaroscuro: Throwing Light on the Concept of Corporate Governance, 48 Hum. Rel. 875, 886 (1995).Google Scholar

¹⁹¹ Business and Human Rights: Mapping International Standards of Responsibility and Accountability for Corporate Acts, Human Rights Council, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/4/035 (Feb. 9, 2007).Google Scholar

¹⁹² Rep. of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie—Business and Human Rights: Mapping International Standards of Responsibility and Accountability for Corporate Acts, Human Rights Council, U.N. Doc. A/HRSC/4/35 (Feb. 19, 2007).Google Scholar

¹⁹³ Harrison, supra note 184, at 205–17.Google Scholar

¹⁹⁴ Guiding Principles, supra note 38, at Principle 19.Google Scholar

¹⁹⁵ Id. Google Scholar

¹⁹⁶ Chandler v. Cape Industries, [2012] EWCA Civ 525.Google Scholar

¹⁹⁷ Framework, supra note 37, at 20.Google Scholar

¹⁹⁸ Onora Nell, Lifeboat Earth, 4 Phil. Pub. Aff. 273, 286 (1975).Google Scholar

¹⁹⁹ Samuel Scheffler, Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought 43–45 (2003).Google Scholar

²⁰⁰ Iris Marion Young, Responsibility for Justice, 102–107 (2013).Google Scholar

²⁰¹ See supra Part D.II.2.Google Scholar

²⁰² Harrison, supra note 184, at 114.Google Scholar

²⁰³ Fasterling & Demuijnck, supra note 29, at 807.Google Scholar

²⁰⁴ Id. at 805.Google Scholar

²⁰⁵ J.F. Sherman & A. lehr, Human Rights Due Diligence: Is It Too Risky?, 17–20 (2010), http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_55_shermanleHRs.pdf.Google Scholar

²⁰⁶ Guiding Principles, supra note 38, Commentary to Principle 25.Google Scholar

²⁰⁷ Jonathan Drimmer & Laplante, Lisa J., The Third Pillar: Remedies, Reparations, and the Ruggie Principles, in The Business and Human Rights Landscape: Moving Forward, Looking Back 316, 316–17 (Jena Martin & Bravo, Karen E. eds., 2015).Google Scholar

²⁰⁸ Guiding Principles, supra note 38, at Commentary to Principle 25.Google Scholar

²⁰⁹ See infra Part C. II.Google Scholar

²¹⁰ Ruggie, John G., Presentation of Report to United Nations Human Rights Council (2009), http://www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-statement-to-UN-Human-Rights-Council-2-Jun-2009.pdf.Google Scholar

²¹¹ Reto Walther, UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights & Effective Remedies: A state-based non-judicial grievance mechanism for Switzerland (2014), http://www.humanrights.ch/upload/pdf/140730_Walther_Klagemechanismus.pdf.Google Scholar

²¹² Drimmer & Laplante, supra note 208, at 318.Google Scholar

²¹³ Guiding Principles, supra note 38, at Commentary to Principle 27.Google Scholar

²¹⁴ Caroline Rees, Piloting Principles for Effective Company-Stakeholder Grievance Mechanisms: A Report of Lessons Learned, in Harvard Kennedy School CSR Initiative 9 (2011).Google Scholar

²¹⁵ Drimmer & Laplante, supra note 208, at 318–19.Google Scholar

²¹⁶ Guiding Principles, supra note 38, at Commentary to Principle 30.Google Scholar

²¹⁷ Id. at Commentary to Principle 25.Google Scholar

²¹⁸ Drimmer & Laplante, supra note 208, at 320.Google Scholar

²¹⁹ Guiding Principles, supra note 38, at Commentary to Principle 31.Google Scholar

²²⁰ Id. Google Scholar

²²¹ Framework, supra note 37, at 22.Google Scholar

²²² Deva, supra note 155, at 113.Google Scholar

²²³ See generally Baughen, supra note 95.Google Scholar

²²⁴ Deva, supra note 53, at 102.Google Scholar

²²⁵ Gwynne Skinner, Robert McQuorcodale, Olivier De Schutter, The Third Pillar: Access to Judicial Remedies for Human Rights Violations by Transnational Business, 32–47, 77–84 (2013), http://corporate-responsibility.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/The-Third-Pillar-FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar

²²⁶ The seven criteria are that the remedies should be: Legitimate, accessible, predictable, equitable, transparent, rights-compatible, and a source of continuous learning, in the case of corporate mechanism, based on stakeholder engagement and dialogue.Google Scholar

²²⁷ Walther, supra note 212, at 27.Google Scholar

²²⁸ Rep. from an Expert Workshop entitled “Business Impacts and Non-judicial Access to Remedy: Emerging Global Experience,” Human Rights Council, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/26/25/Add.3, 10 (Apr. 25, 2014).Google Scholar

²²⁹ Guiding Principles, supra note 38, at Principle 31(a).Google Scholar

²³⁰ UN Norms, supra note 91, at paragraph 18.Google Scholar

²³¹ See generally Principle, Reparation, supra note 84.Google Scholar

²³² Deva, supra note 53, at 102.Google Scholar

²³³ Drimmer & Laplante, supra note 208, at 321.Google Scholar

²³⁴ Deva, supra note 155, at 116.Google Scholar

²³⁵ Surya Deva and David Bilchitz, The Human Rights Obligations of Business: A Critical Framework for the Future, in Human Rights Obligations of Business—Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? 1, 16 (Surya Deva and David Bilchitz eds., 2013.Google Scholar

²³⁶ Walther, supra note 212, at 25.Google Scholar

²³⁷ Wettstein, supra note 90, at 162.Google Scholar

²³⁸ Jerbi, S., Business and Human Rights at the UN: What Might Happen Next?, 31 Hum. Rts. Q. 299, 301 (2009).Google Scholar

²³⁹ Id. Google Scholar

²⁴⁰ Nicola Jägers, UN Guiding Principles On Business And Human Rights: Making Headway Towards Real Corporate Accountability?, 29 Neth. Q. of Hum. Rts. 159, 160 (2011).Google Scholar

²⁴¹ Arnold, Denis G., Transnational Corporations and the Duty to Respect Basic Human Rights, 20 Bus. Ethics Q 317, 389 (2010).Google Scholar

²⁴² United Nations Human Rights Council Res. 26/9, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/RES/26/9 (July 15, 2014).Google Scholar

²⁴³ Joe Zhang, Negotiations Kick Off on a Binding Treaty on Business and Human Rights, Investment Treaty News (Nov. 26, 2015) http://www.iisd.org/itn/2015/11/26/negotiations-kick-off-on-a-binding-treaty-on-business-and-humanrights/.Google Scholar

²⁴⁴ See generally UN Human Rights Council, supra note 243.Google Scholar

²⁴⁵ See generally Zhang, supra note 244.Google Scholar

²⁴⁶ Deva, supra note 155, at 176–231.Google Scholar

²⁴⁷ See John g. Ruggie, Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights 77 (2013).Google Scholar

²⁴⁸ Wettstein, supra note 90, at 163.Google Scholar