Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:09:16.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Business Encounters Organized Crime: The Case of Trafficking in Human Beings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Maria O'Neill*
Affiliation:
Law, University of Abertay

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With increasing globalization, transnational crime in general, and human trafficking in particular, a design of new legal framework is required in order to effectively operationalize interstate law enforcement operations and prosecutions. The development of a transnational criminal legal framework—or frameworks—can build on pre-existing transnational economic frameworks. There is also the need to extend the application of domestic law beyond national borders to influence transnational corporate behavior. Regulations based on reflexive law are one possible approach. Teubner's idea of reflexive law has been informing developments in this area. This approach uses traditional national law to inform corporate governance strategies in order to achieve effects on the market. A few jurisdictions have already adopted measures modeled on this approach to tackle human trafficking and slavery-like conditions in global supply chains. Weaknesses in the approaches adopted by the UK and the State of California have already been identified. If strengthened, this approach could be adopted in more jurisdictions—including the EU—and also to combat more areas of transnational crime—such as money laundering. This paper will examine the resulting challenges using human trafficking as a case study.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 See Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime, opened for signature Nov. 15, 2000, 2225 U.N.T.S. 209.Google Scholar

2 See Directive 2011/36, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on Preventing and Combating Trafficking in Human Beings and Protecting its Victims, and Replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA, 2011 O.J. (L 101) 1 (EU) [hereinafter Council Directive 2011/36].Google Scholar

3 Girard, Bradley, Corporate Transparency Through the SEC as an Antidote to Substandard Working Conditions in the Global Supply Chain, 21 Geo. J. on Poverty L. & Pol'y 317, 321 (2014).Google Scholar

4 Id. at 322.Google Scholar

5 See Modern Slavery Act 2015, c. 30, § 54 (Eng.).Google Scholar

6 Girard, supra note 3, at 322.Google Scholar

7 See Directive 2014/95, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 Amending Directive 2013/34/EU as Regards Disclosure of Non-financial and Diversity Information by Certain Large Undertakings and Groups, 2014 O.J. (L 330) 1 (EU) [hereinafter Council Directive 2014/95].Google Scholar

8 See Transparency in the Supply Chains Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1743.43 (2012) [hereinafter Californian Act].Google Scholar

9 Janczuk-Gorywoda, Agnieszka, Public-Private Hybrid Governance for Electronic Payments in the European Union, 13 German L.J. 1438, 1439 (2012).Google Scholar

10 Teubner, Gunther, Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law, 17 L. & Soc'y Rev. 239, 273 (1983).Google Scholar

11 Caruso, Daniela, Private Law and State-Making in the Age of Globalization, 39 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol 2, 3 (2002).Google Scholar

12 De Schutter, Olivier & Deakin, Simon, Reflexive Governance and the Dilemmas of Social Regulation, General Introduction, in Social Rights and Market Forces; Is the Open Coordination of Employment and Social Policies the Future of Social Europe?, 7 (Olivier De Schutter & Simon Deakin eds., 2005).Google Scholar

13 Orts, Eric W., A Reflexive Model of Environmental Regulation, 5 Bus. Ethics Q. 779, 780 (1995).Google Scholar

14 Id. at 780.Google Scholar

15 Id. at 787.Google Scholar

16 Teubner, supra note 10, at 254–55.Google Scholar

17 Id. at 255.Google Scholar

18 Id. at 267.Google Scholar

19 Id. at 270.Google Scholar

20 Id. at 256.Google Scholar

21 Id. at 278.Google Scholar

23 Shaffer, Gregory, Transnational Legal Process and State Change, 37 L. & Soc. Inquiry 229, 231 (2011).Google Scholar

24 Teubner, supra note 10, at 275.Google Scholar

25 Id. at 276.Google Scholar

28 See Joint Action 97/154, of 24 February 1997 Adopted by the Council on the Basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union Concerning Action to Combat Trafficking in Human Beings and Sexual Exploitation of Children, 1997 O.J. (L 63) 2 (EU).Google Scholar

29 See Directive 2013/34, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the Annual Financial Statements, Consolidated Financial Statements and Related Reports of Certain Types of Undertakings, Amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC, 2013 O.J. (L 182) 19 (EU) [hereinafter Council Directive 2013/34].Google Scholar

30 Council Directive 2014/95, supra note 7, at art. 1.Google Scholar

31 Council Directive 2013/34, supra note 29.Google Scholar

32 Id. at art. 2.Google Scholar

33 Council Directive 2014/95, supra note 7, at art.1 (inserting a new art. 19(a) to Directive 2013/34).Google Scholar

34 Id. at para. 3.Google Scholar

35 See Home Office, Transparency in Supply Chains: A Practical Guide, 2015, at 26 (Eng.).Google Scholar

36 See generally 22 U.S.C. § 7101 (2018), e.g. inserting, inter alia, new arts. 1589–1591.Google Scholar

37 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Leveraging Anti-Money Laundering Regimes to Combat Trafficking in Human Beings 26 (2014).Google Scholar

38 Californian Act at § 3.Google Scholar

39 Id. at §§ 3(a)(1) & 2.Google Scholar

40 See id. at § 3(3).Google Scholar

41 Id. at § 3(a)(4).Google Scholar

42 See id. at § 3(a)(5).Google Scholar

43 Todres, Jonathan, The Private Sector's Pivotal Role in Combating Human Trafficking, 3 Cal. L. Rev. Cir. 80, 81 (2012).Google Scholar

44 Modern Slavery Act 2015, § 54 (which came into force on October 29, 2015, pursuant to the Modern Slavery Act 2015 (Commencement No. 3 and Transitional Provision) Regulations 2015, SI 2015/1816 (Eng.)).Google Scholar

45 See Modern Slavery Act 2015 at § 54(3).Google Scholar

46 Modern Slavery Act 2015 (Transparency in Supply Chains) Regulations 2015, SI 2015/1833, § 2 (Eng.).Google Scholar

47 See UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework (2011).Google Scholar

48 See Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises Responsible Business Conduct Matters (2014).Google Scholar

49 A number of provisions of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 apply to the whole of the UK, to include the Section 54 provision on human trafficking in global supply chains. See Modern Slavery Act 2015 at § 54.Google Scholar

50 See generally Human Trafficking and Exploitation (Scotland) Act 2015, (ASP 12); see also The Human Trafficking and Exploitation (Criminal Justice and Support for Victims) Act (Northern Ireland) 2015 c. 2.Google Scholar

51 Leveraging Anti-Money Laundering Regimes, supra note 37, at 14.Google Scholar

52 Id. at 9.Google Scholar

53 Grossey, Susan, I am not a number, I am a free man, Money Laundering Bulletin 15 (Sept. 2011), http://www.airant.it/system/files/MLB%20Sept%202011.pdf.Google Scholar

54 Leveraging Anti-Money Laundering Regimes, supra note 37, at 9.Google Scholar

55 Financial Action Task Force, Money Laundering Risks Arising from Trafficking in Human Beings and Smuggling of Migrants 63 (2011).Google Scholar

56 Leveraging Anti-Money Laundering Regimes, supra note 37, at 18.Google Scholar

57 See Guzman, Daniela, How Financial Institutions Lead Way in Battle Against Human Trafficking, Insight Crime, (May 6, 2014), https://www.insightcrime.org/news/analysis/how-financial-institutions-lead-way-in-battle-against-human-trafficking/.Google Scholar

58 Girard, supra note 3, at 321.Google Scholar

59 Id. at 338.Google Scholar

60 Shaffer, supra note 23, at 244.Google Scholar

61 Christian Tietje et al., Philip C. Jessup's Transnational Law Revisited 28 (Christian Tietje et al. eds., 2006).Google Scholar

62 Id. at 29.Google Scholar

63 Shaffer, supra note 23, at 243–44.Google Scholar

64 Dorf, Michael, The Domain of Reflexive Law, 103 Colum. L. Rev. 384, 398 (2003).Google Scholar

65 Buhmann, Karin, Reflexive Regulation of CSR to Promote Sustainability: Understanding EU Public-Private Regulation on CSR Through the Case of Human Rights, 8 Int'l & Comp. Corp. L.J. 38, 55 (2010).Google Scholar

66 Id. at 16.Google Scholar

67 Ralf Rogowski, Reflexive Labor Law in the World Society, 63 (2013).Google Scholar

68 Id. at 38.Google Scholar

69 Zumbansen, Peer, Law after the Welfare State: Formalism, Functionalism and the Ironic Turn of Reflexive Law, 56 Am. J. of Comp. L. 769, 794 (2008).Google Scholar

70 Schutter, De & Deakin, supra note 12, at 4.Google Scholar

71 Orts, supra note 13, at 780.Google Scholar

72 See id. Google Scholar

73 Dorf, supra note 64, at 398.Google Scholar

74 Id. at 395.Google Scholar

75 Barnard, Catherine et al., Reflexive Law, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Evolution of Labour Standards: The Case of Working Time 5 (ESRC Ctr. for Bus. Research, U. of Cambridge, Working Paper no. 294, 2004), https://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/centre-for-business-research/downloads/working-papers/wp294.pdf.Google Scholar

76 Id. at 4.Google Scholar

77 Deakin, Simon & McLaughlin, Colm, Gender Inequality and Reflexive Law: The Potential for Different Regulatory Mechanisms for Making Employment Rights Effective 25, (ESRC Ctr. for Bus. Research, U. of Cambridge, Working Paper No. 426, 2011), https://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/centre-for-business-research/downloads/working-papers/wp426.pdf.Google Scholar

78 Id. at 21–22.Google Scholar

79 Zumbansen, supra note 69, at 24.Google Scholar

80 Deakin & McLaughlin, supra note 77, at 5.Google Scholar

83 Id. at 6.Google Scholar

85 See Modern Slavery Act 2015, § 54(2).Google Scholar

86 See Home Office, Modern Slavery and Supply Chains Government Response Summary of Consultation Responses and Next Steps, 6 (2015) (Eng.).Google Scholar

87 See id. at 6, para. 5(4).Google Scholar

88 Now supplemented by the Modern Slavery act 2015 (Transparency in Supply Chains) Regulations 2015/1833, which came into force on October 29, 2015). See Modern Slavery Act 2015 (Transparency in Supply Chains) Regulations 2015, SI 2015/1833, § 2 (UK).Google Scholar

89 Modern Slavery Act 2015, § 54(4).Google Scholar

90 See id. at § 54(4)(b).Google Scholar

91 Id. at § 54(11).Google Scholar

92 Home Office, supra note 35, at 6.Google Scholar

93 See id. at 6.Google Scholar

94 Home Office, Modern Slavery and Supply Chains Consultation on the Transparency in Supply Chains Clause in the Modern Slavery Bill 17 (2015).Google Scholar

95 Modern Slavery Act 2015, § 54(7).Google Scholar

96 See id. at § 54(8).Google Scholar

97 Home Office, supra note 35, at 14.Google Scholar

98 Id. at 5.Google Scholar

99 Id. at 6.Google Scholar

100 See id. Google Scholar

101 Deakin & McLaughlin, supra note 77, at 21–22.Google Scholar

102 Id. at 5.Google Scholar

103 Id. at 6.Google Scholar

104 Girard, supra note 3, at 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

105 Id. at 337.Google Scholar

106 Id. at 337–38.Google Scholar

107 See Narine, Marcia, From Kansas to the Congo: Why Naming and Shaming Corporations Through the Dodd-Frank Act's Corporate Governance Disclosure Won't Solve Human Rights Crisis, 25 Regent U. L. Rev. 351, 371 (2013).Google Scholar

108 See Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and Directors’ Report) Regulations 2013, SI 2013/1970 (Eng.).Google Scholar

109 Id. at § 3 (inserting a new § 414(C)(7)(b)(iii) into the Companies Act 2006, c. 46 (Eng.)).Google Scholar

110 See Companies Act 2006, c. 46, § 414(A) (Eng.).Google Scholar

111 Home Office, supra note 35, at 25.Google Scholar

112 Feasley, Ashley, Eliminating Corporate Exploitation: Examining Accountability Regimes as Means to Eradicate Forced Labor from Supply Chains, 2 J. of Hum. Trafficking 15, 24 (2016).Google Scholar

113 Id. Google Scholar

114 Narine, supra note 107, at 371.Google Scholar

115 See id. Google Scholar

116 Feasley, supra note 112, at 25.Google Scholar

117 Id. Google Scholar

118 See Doe I v. Nestle USA, Inc., 738 F. 3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2013).Google Scholar

119 Feasley, supra note 112, at 27.Google Scholar

120 Id. at 26.Google Scholar

121 Id. at 16.Google Scholar

122 Id. at 15.Google Scholar

123 Deakin & McLaughlin, supra note 77, at 6.Google Scholar

124 Feasley, supra note 112, at 23.Google Scholar

125 Gold, Stefan et al., Modern Slavery Challenges to Supply Chain Management, 20 Supply Chain Mgmt.: an Int'l J. 485, 486 (2015).Google Scholar

126 Aalders, Marius & Wilthagen, Ton, Moving Beyond Command-and-Control: Reflexivity in the Regulation of Occupational Safety and Health and the Environment, 19 L. & Pol'y 415, 436 (1997).Google Scholar

127 Feasley, supra note 112, at 18–19.Google Scholar

128 Girard, supra note 3, at 322.Google Scholar

129 Id. at 338.Google Scholar

130 Zumbansen, supra note 69, at 25.Google Scholar

131 See Orts, supra note 13, at 780.Google Scholar

132 See Teubner, supra note 10, at 276.Google Scholar

133 Aalders & Wilthagen, supra note 126, at 432.Google Scholar

134 Shaffer, supra note 23, at 260.Google Scholar

135 Id. Google Scholar

136 See id. at 259.Google Scholar

137 See id. Google Scholar

138 Aalders & Wilthagen, supra note 126, at 431.Google Scholar

139 See Deakin & McLaughlin, supra note 77, at 6.Google Scholar

140 Aalders & Wilthagen, supra note 126, at 431.Google Scholar

141 Id. at 436.Google Scholar