¹ See, e.g., Rancière, J., Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy (1999); Z. Bauman, From Bystander to Actor, 2 Journal of Human Rights 137-51 (2003).Google Scholar

² See Agamben, G., Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (1998).Google Scholar

³ See Agamben, G., Bodies Without Words: Against the Biopolitical Tatoo, 5 German Law Journal 168 (2004).Google Scholar

⁴ See Davis, M.S., That's Interesting!, 1 Philosophy of the Social Sciences 309-44 (1971) (discussing why some texts are perceived as more interesting than others).Google Scholar

⁵ See Foucault, M., Histoire de la sexualité, vol. 1: La volonte de savoir (Paris: Gallimard, 1976).Google Scholar

⁶ See, e.g., Millns, S., Death, Dignity and Discrimination: The Case of Pretty v. United Kingdom, 3 German Law Journal No. 10 (2002); K.S. Ziegler, Criminal Victims/Witnesses of Crimes: The Criminal Offences of Smuggling and Trafficking of Human Beings in Germany, Discretionary Residence Rights, and Other Ways of Protecting Victims, 6 German Law Journal 605 (2005); A. Fischer-Lescano, Torture in Abu Ghraib. The Compliant against Donald Rumsfeld under the German Code against Crimes under International Law, 6 German Law Journal 689 (2005).Google Scholar

⁷ Agamben, supra note 2, at 133-4.Google Scholar

⁸ Arendt, H., The Origins of Totalitarianism 289 (1951).Google Scholar

⁹ See Koji, T., Emerging Hierarchy in International Human Rights and Beyond: From the Perspective of Nonderogable Rights, 12 European Journal of International Law 917 (2001).Google Scholar

¹⁰ See the judgment on the Varvarin Case, District Court of Bonn (1 O 361/02), December 10, 2003, available at: http://www.justiz.nrw.de/RB/nrwe/lgs/bonn/lg_bonn/j2003/1_O_361_02urteil20031210.html. See also Banković and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States ((dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, ECHR 2001-XII) concerning the bombing of the Radio Televizije Srbije (Radio-Television Serbia) headquarters in Belgrade on 23 April 1999 as part of NATO's campaign of air strikes against the FRY during the Kosovo conflict.Google Scholar

¹¹ See the ruling of the Second Senate of the German Constitutional Court, Oct 14, 2004 (2 BvR 1481/04).Google Scholar

¹² 28 U.S.C. Sect. 1350 (ATCA). See Hufbauer, G.C. and Mitrokostas, N.K., Awakening Monster: The Alien Tort Statute of 1789 (2003); C. Forcese, ATCA's Achilles Heel: Corporate Complicity, International Law and the Alien Tort Claims Act, 26 Yale Journal of International Law 487 (2001).Google Scholar

¹³ Pena-Irala, Filartiga v., 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980), 30 June 1980, at 890.Google Scholar

¹⁴ See Stephens, B. and Ratner, M., International Human Rights Litigation in U.S. Courts (1996); B. Van Schaack, In Defense of Civil Redress: The Domestic Enforcement of Human Rights Norms in the Context of the Proposed Hague Judgements Convention, 42 Harvard International Law Journal 141-200 (2001).Google Scholar

¹⁵ See Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 124 S.Ct. 2739 (2004) and the case note discussing this landmark decision: (http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/29june20041115/www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/03pdf/03-339.pdf). See also Greenhouse, L., Human Rights Abuses Worldwide Are Held to Fall Under U.S. Courts, New York Times, June 30, 2004, at 21.Google Scholar

¹⁶ See the Racial Equality and Employment Equality Directives of the EU Council (2000/43/EC, 29 June 2000 and 2000/78/EC, 27 November 2000).Google Scholar

¹⁷ See Wax, A., Expressive Law and Oppressive Norms, 86 Virginia Law Review 1731-80 (2000).Google Scholar

¹⁸ Luhmann, N., Ethik in internationalen Beziehungen, 50 Soziale Welt 247-54 (1999).Google Scholar

¹⁹ See Thomas, D.C., Boomerangs and Superpowers: International Norms, Transnational Networks and US Foreign Policy, 15 Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25-44 (2002).Google Scholar

²⁰ See Hillemanns, C.F., UN Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights, 4 German Law Journal 1065 (2003).Google Scholar

²¹ Busse, M., Democracy and FDI (HWWA Discussion Paper Nr. 220/2003), available at: http://www.hwwa.de/hwwa.html.Google Scholar

²² See Wheeler, N.J., Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (2000).Google Scholar

²³ Ignatieff, M., Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry 22 (2001).Google Scholar

²⁴ It should be noted, however, that recent documents of the Vatican, in particular, contain numerous positive references both to the idea of universal human rights and to specific human rights treaties. See, e.g., John Paul II, Sollicitudo Rei Socialis (December 30, 1987), available at: http://www.vatican.va/edocs/ENG0223/_INDEX.HTM.Google Scholar

²⁵ See Heins, V., How to Meet the First Public Obligation: Contending Discourses in Humanitarian Organizations 32-38 (Harvard University, Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, Working Paper 2004), available at: http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/cchrp/news_wpapers.shtml.Google Scholar

²⁶ See Seiple, C., The U.S. Military/NGO Relationship in Humanitarian Interventions 53 (1996); Humanitarian Challenges and Intervention 67-68 (Weiss, T.G. and Collins, C. eds., 2nd ed 2000).Google Scholar

²⁷ The New Humanitarianisms: A Review of Trends in Global Humanitarian Action. (J. Macrae ed., HPG Report 11, April 2002), available at: http://www.odi.org.uk/hpg/papers/hpgreport11.pdf.Google Scholar

²⁸ See Kadelbach, S., Zwingendes Völkerrecht (1992).Google Scholar

²⁹ Here I am drawing on interviews with anonymous sources. The investigation unit of the ad hoc tribunal in Sierra Leone does everything not to “jeopardize [its] future cooperation” with humanitarian organizations (personal communication from the Chief Prosecutor's office in Freetown, Sierra Leone, April 22, 2004). See Rona, G., The ICRC Privilege Not to Testify: Confidentiality in Action, International Review of the Red Cross No. 845, 207-19 (2002).Google Scholar

³⁰ Kennedy, D., The Dark Side of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism 338 (2004).Google Scholar

³¹ Koh, H.H., Review Essay: Why Do Nations Obey International Law?, 106 Yale Law Journal 2599 (1997).Google Scholar

³² For a classic explication of the norm of neutrality, see Haug, H., Neutrality as a fundamental principle of the Red Cross, International Review of the Red Cross No. 315, 627-30 (1996).Google Scholar

³³ See Ignatieff, supra note 23.Google Scholar

³⁴ Schmitt, C., Die Diktatur. Von den Anfängen des modernen Souveränitätsgedankens bis zum proletarischen Klassenkampf 175 (4th ed. 1978).Google Scholar

³⁵ See Farrell, T., The Norms of War: Cultural Beliefs and Modern Conflict (2005).Google Scholar

³⁶ See the conclusion in Favez, J.-C., The Red Cross and the Holocaust (1999).Google Scholar

³⁷ See Schmitt, C., Der Begriff des Politischen. Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien 39 (1963).Google Scholar

³⁸ See Kouchner, B., Ce que je crois 107-8 (1995).Google Scholar

³⁹ See Stover, E., Haglund, W.D. and Samuels, M., Exhumation of Mass Graves in Iraq: Considerations for Forencic Investigations, Humanitarian Needs, and the Demands of Justice, Journal of the American Medical Association No. 290, 663-6 (2003).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Consider the case of the devastating suicide bomb attack against the Red Cross headquarters in Baghdad on October 27, 2003. See Anderson, K., Humanitarian Inviolability in Crisis: The Meaning of Impartiality and Neutrality for U.N. and NGO Agencies Following the 2003-2004 Afghanistan and Iraq Conflicts, 17 Harvard Human Rights Journal 41-74 (2004).Google Scholar

⁴¹ See, e.g., Germany: Schily criticises Cap Anamur over immigrant affair, ANSA English Media Service, July 15, 2004, at 1.Google Scholar

⁴² Agamben, supra note 2, at 133.Google Scholar

⁴³ See Mesnard, P., The Political Philosophy of Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Evaluation, 5 Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 139-157 (2004).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ See Terms of Engagement: Conditions and Conditionality in Humanitarian Action (Leader, N. and Macrae, J. eds., HPG Report 6/2000), available at: http://www.odi.org.uk/hpg.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ See Lischer, S.K., Dangerous Sanctuaries: Refugee Camps, Civil War, and the Dilemmas of Humanitarian Aid (2005).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ See Warner, D., The Politics of the Political/Humanitarian Divide, International Review of the Red Cross No. 833, 109-18 (1999).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ See Koskenniemi, M., The Effect of Rights on Political Culture, in The EU and Human Rights 99-116 (P. Alston ed., 1999).Google Scholar

⁴⁸ See Giry, S., A Losing Strategy on War Crimes, International Herald Tribune, February 12-13, 2005, at 6.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Hathaway, O.A., Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?, 111 Yale Law Journal 1935 (2002).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Kennedy, supra note 30, at 25-6.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Id. at 26-30.Google Scholar

⁵² Agamben, supra note 2, at 121.Google Scholar

⁵³ Schmitt, supra note 36, at 55.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Adorno, Th.W., Über Mitbestimmung, Regelverstöße und Verwandtes. Diskussion im Rahmen einer Vorlesung am 5.12.1967, in VI Frankfurter Adorno Blätter 155, 167 (2000).Google Scholar