Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:24:31.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Force of Code: Law's Transformation under Information-Technological Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As one of the commentators of Luhmann's oeuvre once rightly put it, “the occasionally authoritative gestures of Luhmann's writing may intimidate all those who do not also perceive his gentle touches of irony.” Luhmann's note at the end of his treatise, Law as a Social System, about law's future in the global society is one of those typical statements of Luhmann, characterized by this mixture of authoritative “coolness” with a touch of irony. Be that as it may, the master seems to be once again right with his prophecy-like statement: Law is indeed undergoing a transformation, the results of which might soon let law appear as nothing more than a “European anomaly, which might well level off with the evolution of global society.”

Type
The Law of the Knowledge Society
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich, Form Without Matter vs. Form as Event, 111 Modern Language Notes 578 (1996).Google Scholar

2 Luhmann, Niklas, Law as a Social System 490 (2004).Google Scholar

3 For this transformation of law because of the emergence of a world-society, see Amstutz, Marc & Karavas, Vaios, Rechtsmutation: Zu Genese und Evolution des Rechts im transnationalen Raum, 8 Rechtsgeschichte 14 (2006).Google Scholar

4 Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey, Silicon Sociology, or, Two Kings on Hegel's Throne? Luhmann, Kittler and the Posthuman Merger of German Media Theory, 13 Yale Journal of Criticism 391, 397 (2000).Google Scholar

5 These two expressions stem from Winthrop-Young's abovementioned article, id., 391.Google Scholar

6 Kittler, Friedrich, Ein Herr namens Luhmann, in ‘Gibt es eigentlich den Berliner Zoo noch?’ Erinnerungen an Niklas Luhmann, 183, 185 (Theodor M Bardmann & Dirk Baecker eds., 1999) [my translation]Google Scholar

7 Luhmann, Niklas, How Can the Mind Participate in Communication?, in Materialities of Communication, 371 (Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht & Karl Ludwig Pfeiffer eds., 1994).Google Scholar

8 Id., 374.Google Scholar

9 At this point Luhmann refers to what Maturana calls the “conservation of adaptation”, i.e., the relationship between a system and the medium (or environment) in which a system exists: Id., 376.Google Scholar

10 Id., 375.Google Scholar

11 Id., 376.Google Scholar

12 Luhmann, Niklas, The Reality of the Mass Media 3–4 (2000).Google Scholar

13 But see Baecker, Dirk, Studien zur nächsten Gesellschaft (2007); id.: Niklas Luhmann in the Society of the Computer, 13 Cybernetics and Human Knowing 25 (2006).Google Scholar

14 Luhmann, Niklas, Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft 117–118 (1997), [translation provided by Winthrop-Young (note 4), 414].Google Scholar

15 For secondary literature on Kittler's work in English, see the special issue on Kittler of 23 Theory, Culture & Society (Geoffrey Winthrop-Young & Nicholas Gane eds., 2006); see further Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey, Cultural Studies and German Media Theory, in New Cultural Studies: Adventures in Theory, 88 (Gary Hall & Clare Birchall eds., 2002); id.: Drill and Distraction in the Yellow Submarine: The Dominance of War in Friedrich Kittler's Media Theory, 28 Critical Inquiry 825 (2002); Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey & Wutz, Michael, Friedrich Kittler and Media Discourse Analysis, in Friedrich Kittler, Gramophone, Film, Typewriter, xi (Geoffrey Winthrop-Young & Michael Wutz trans., 1999); Gane, Nicholas, Radical Post-humanism. Friedrich Kittler and the Primacy of Technology, 22 Theory, Culture & Society 25 (2005); Johnston, John, Friedrich Kittler: Media Theory after Poststructuralism, in Friedrich Kittler, Literature, Media, Information Systems: Essays, 2 (John Johnston trans., 1997); Griffin, Matthew, Literary Studies +/- Literature: Friedrich A. Kittler's Media Histories, 27 New Literary History 709 (1996). For books of Kitller in English, see Friedrich Kittler, Gramophone, Film, Typewriter (Geoffrey Winthrop-Young & Michael Wutz trans., 1999); id.: Literature, Media, Information Systems: Essays (John Johnston ed., 1997); id.: Discourse Networks, 1800/1900 (Michael Metteer & Chris Cullens trans., 1990).Google Scholar

16 Krämer, Sibylle, The Cultural Techniques of Time Axis Manipulation: On Friedrich Kittler's Conception of Media, 23 Theory, Culture & Society 93, 96 (2006).Google Scholar

17 Id., 96.Google Scholar

18 McLuhan, Marshall, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (1994).Google Scholar

19 Kittler, Friedrich, Optische Medien 30–32 (2002).Google Scholar

20 Kittler, Friedrich, Draculas Vermächtnis: Technische Schriften 182 (1993).Google Scholar

21 Krämer, supra note 16, 106.Google Scholar

22 Kittler, , supra note 20, 182 [translation provided by Krämer, supra note 16, 99].Google Scholar

23 Krämer, supra note 16, 94.Google Scholar

24 Kittler, , supra note 20, 182 [translation provided by Krämer, supra note 16, 99].Google Scholar

25 Krämer, supra note 16, 99.Google Scholar

26 Id., 96.Google Scholar

27 Kitller, , supra note 20, 182.Google Scholar

28 Krämer, supra note 16, 103.Google Scholar

30 Luhmann, , supra note 14, 590 [my translation].Google Scholar

31 Maresch, Rudolf, Die Kommunikation der Kommunikation, in Kommunikation Medien Macht, 265, 276 (Rudolf Maresch & Niels Werber eds., 1999) [translation provided by Winthrop-Young (note 4), 415].Google Scholar

32 Processes of computation recently also affect Life itself. See for instance eugene Thacker, Biomedia (2004).Google Scholar

33 Lessig, Lawrence, Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace (1999); see also the revised version id.: Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0 (2006).Google Scholar

34 See especially Barlow, John Perry, A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace (1996) available at: www.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html, last accessed 23 February 2009; David R Johnson & David G Post, Law and Borders – The Rise of law in Cyberspace, 48 Stanford law Review 1367 (1996).Google Scholar

35 See primarily Reidenberg, Joel R, Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology, 76 Texas Law Review 553 (1998).Google Scholar

36 Id., 566.Google Scholar

37 Id., 567.Google Scholar

38 Id., 567.Google Scholar

39 Id., 567–568.Google Scholar

40 Id., 568.Google Scholar

41 For critiques of this scholarship, see Sommer, Joseph H, Against Cyberlaw, 15 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1145 (2000); Easterbrook, Frank H, Cyberspace and the Law of the Horse, 207 University of Chicago Legal Forum 216 (1996).Google Scholar

42 Vismann, Cornelia & Krajewski, Markus, Computer Juridisms, 29 Grey Room 90, 91 (2007).Google Scholar

43 Id., 92.Google Scholar

44 Id., 91.Google Scholar

45 Id., 92.Google Scholar

46 The authors mention the following three strategies that law is deploying in order to meet this challenge: fiction, simulation and technology; Id., 92–93.Google Scholar

47 Id., 93.Google Scholar

48 The following works constitute exceptions to this rule: Marc Amstutz, The Letter of the Law, 10 German Law Journal 4, 357 (2009); Vesting, Thomas, Rechtstheorie 71, 75, 144–157 (2007); Karavas, Vagias, Digitale Grundrechte: Elemente einer Verfassung des Informationsflusses im Internet (2007); Röhl, Klaus F, Das Recht nach der visuellen Zeitenwende, 58 Juristenzeitung 339 (2003); Katsh, Ethan M, Law in a Digital World (1995); id.: The Electronic Media and the Transformation of Law (1987); Vismann, Cornelia, Akten. Medientechnik und Recht (1990).Google Scholar

49 See also Karavas, , supra note 48, 155157.Google Scholar

50 Luhmann, , supra note 2, ch. 6, especially at 234.Google Scholar

51 Amstutz, , supra note 48.Google Scholar

52 Amstutz, , supra note 48, 362–363; see also id.: Das Gesetz, in K(l)eine festschrift für Pierre Tercier, 155 (Peter Gauch & Pascal Pichonnaz eds., 2003).Google Scholar

53 Amstutz, , supra note 48, 363.Google Scholar

54 Id., 373.Google Scholar

55 Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002)Google Scholar

56 Supra note 55; regarding the problematic of the digital embodiment of legal rules, see further Dan L Burk & Tarleton Gillepsie, Autonomy and Morality in DRM and Anti-Circumvention Law, 4 tripleC 239 (2006); Burk, Dan L, Legal and Technical Standards in Digital Rights Management Technology, 74 Fordham Law Review 537 (2005); Benoliel, Daniel, Technological Standards, Inc. Rethinking Cyberspace Technological Epistemology, 92 California Law Review 1069 (2004); Radin, Margaret Jane, Regulation by Contract, Regulation by Machine, 160 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 1(2004); id.: Online Standardization and the Integration of Text and Machine, 70 Fordham Law Review 1125 (2002); Burk, Dan L & Cohen, Julie E, Fair Use Infrastructure for Rights Management Systems, 15 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 41 (2001); Lessig, Lawrence, What Things Regulate Speech: CDA 2.0 vs. Filtering, 38 Jurimetrics Journal 629 (1998); Boyle, James, Foucault in Cyberspace: Surveillance, Sovereignty, and Hardwired Censors, 66 University of Cincinnati Law Review 177 (1997).Google Scholar

57 Ogorek, Regina, Richterkönig oder Subsumtionsautomat?: Zur Justiztheorie im 19. Jh. (1986).Google Scholar

58 Karavas, Vaios & Teubner, Gunther, http://www.CompanyNameSucks.com: The Horizontal Effect of Constitutional Rights Against “Private Parties” within Autonomous Internet Law, 4 German Law Journal 1335, 1347 (2003); See also Teubner, Gunther, Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-centred Constitutional theory?, in Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism, 3, 26–27 (Christian Joerges (Inge-Johanne Sand & Gunther Teubner eds., 2004).Google Scholar

59 Karavas, & Teubner, supra note 58, 13471348.Google Scholar

60 Kittler, , supra note 15, 1.Google Scholar

61 Schütz, Anton, Sons of the Writ, Sons of Wrath: Pierre Legendre's Critique of Law-Giving in Law and the Postmodern Mind: Essays on Psychoanalysis and Jurisprudence, 193, 205 (Peter Goodrich & David G Carlson eds., 1998).Google Scholar

62 See, supra note 58; see further Vesting, supra note 48, 125–126; Oren Perez, Purity Lost: The Paradoxical Face of the New Transnational Legal Body, 33 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 3, 32–34 (2007); the author speaks in this regard about a “bundling of law and technology”, he insists though on the separation of is (Sein) and ought (Sollen) in our analysis of modern technology.Google Scholar

63 Ladeur, Karl-Heinz, The Postmodern Condition of Law and Societal “Management of Rules,” 27 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 87 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

64 Id., 87.Google Scholar

65 Id., 105.Google Scholar

66 Jacques Derrida & Elisabeth Roudinesco, For What Tomorrow…: A Dialogue (Cultural memory in the Present) 49–51 (Jeff Fort trans. 2004).Google Scholar

67 Balkin, Jack, Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society, 79 New York University Law Review 1, 51 (2004).Google Scholar

68 Kittler, Friedrich, Computeranalphabetismus, in Literatur im Informationszeitalter, 237 (Dirk Matejowski & Friedrich Kittler eds., 1996).Google Scholar