Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:36:05.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Federal Constitutional Court Defines the Power of Parliamentary Minorities in the Constitutionally Established, Parliamentary Investigative Committees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Volker Röben

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Untersuchungsausschuss-Fall (Parliamentary Committee Case) 2 BvE 2/01, decided by the Bundesverfassungsgericht (BVerfG – Federal Constitutional Court) on 8 April 2002, concerns the so-called right of enquête, a central function of Parliament under the parliamentary system designed by the German Basic Law. The right of enquête, the investigation by Parliament by taking evidence complete with the subpoena powers normally reserved to criminal investigations, has been an integral part of both the Weimar and the Bonn Constitutions. Max Weber, in the era of the Bismarck-Constitution for the German state founded in 1871, made a forceful pitch for the equality of the Parliament and Executive. He argued that members of Parliament needed to be professionals and to have full access to the information that, traditionally, was the source of power of the executive. Instituting committees of investigation with the power to take evidence was the means to do so. In fact, Weber went further, arguing that the right to call for an investigative parliamentary committee needed to be vested in a (qualified) minority of the members of Parliament. There is no equivalent of this specific aspect in the other European parliamentary systems. Article 34 of the Weimar Constitution provided that one fifth of the members of Parliament could ask for the institution of a committee of investigation. The same quorum had the right to move for the hearing of specific evidence by the committee.

Type
Research Article
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 3 , Issue 10 , October 2002 , E5
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

(1) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(2) Max Weber, PARLAMENT UND REGIERUNG IM NEUGEORDNETEN DEUTSCHLAND (1918).Google Scholar

(3) BVerfGE 49, 70.Google Scholar

(4) BVerfGE 67, 100.Google Scholar

(5) BVerfGE 69, 34.Google Scholar

(6) BVerfGE 96, 223.Google Scholar

(7) BTDrucks 14/2139, BT-Plenarprot 14/76, p. 6.Google Scholar

(8) BTDrucks 14/2686, BT-Plenarprot 14/88, p. 8201.Google Scholar

(9) Report of 13 June 2002, includes dissenting report by opposition committee members.Google Scholar

(10) Article 93(1) cl. 1, GG.Google Scholar

(11) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Part B.I., II, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(12) BVerfGE 20, 56, 104.Google Scholar

(13) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 97, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(14) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 99, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(15) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 98, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(16) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Part C, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(17) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Paras. 105-106, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(18) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 107, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(19) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 108, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(20) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 109, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(21) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 109, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(22) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 110, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(23) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 111, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(24) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 113, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(25) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 112, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(26) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 116-118, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(27) BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/01 of 8 April 2002, Para. 130-145, http://www.bverfg.de.Google Scholar

(28) 19 June 2001, BGBl I p. 1142.Google Scholar

(29) § 36.Google Scholar