Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:03:29.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Law of the European Union revisited. A review of BERNHARD NAGEL – Economic Law of the European Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Timo Tohidipur

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , April 2002 , E6
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

(1) Bernhard Nagel, Wirtschaftsrecht der Europäischen Union. Eine Einführung, 3. Auflage, Baden-Baden 2001, NOMOS Verlag.Google Scholar

(2) For the latest development see the new Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, Official Journal L 12, 16/01/2001 pages 1 - 23.Google Scholar

(3) Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999, Official Journal L 171 (1999) pages 12 - 16; Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 (“Directive on electronic commerce”), Official Journal L 178 (2000) pages 1 - 16; Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000, Official Journal L 200 (2000) pages 35 - 38.Google Scholar

(4) ECJ Case C-212/97, (Centros Ltd. v. Erhvervs- og Selskabsstyrelsen), ECR 1999 I-1459.Google Scholar

(5) See Barbara Trefil, European Company Law: Comments and Meta-Comments on Centros, German L.J. 2001 No18 (1 December 2001), available at: (http://www.germanlawjournal.com/past_issues.php?id=117.Google Scholar

(6) Gert Nicolaysen, Europarecht II, Das Wirtschaftsrecht im Binnenmarkt, Baden-Baden 1996.Google Scholar

(7) ECJ Case 8/74 (Procureur du Roi v. Benoit and Dassonville), ECR 1974, 837.Google Scholar

(8) ECJ Joined Cases C-267 & 268/91 (Keck and Mithouard), ECR 1995 I-6097.Google Scholar

(9) ECJ Case C-379/98 (PreussenElektra AG and Schleswag AG), available at: http://europa.eu.int/cj/en/cp/aff/cp0110en.htm; see the commentary in German L. J. No. 7 (15 April 2001), available at: http://www.germanlawjournal.com/past_issues.php?id=66.Google Scholar

(10) Case C-39/94 (SFEI and Others), ECR 1996, I-3547, para 60.Google Scholar

(11) See Craig, Paul, The Nature of the Community, in: THE EVOLUTION OF EU LAW 1-54 (Paul Craig/Gráinne de Burca (Eds.) 1999), 16 ff. See. for an assessment of “Multilevel Constitutionalism” as “legal pendant”: Ingolf Pernice, RETHINKING THE METHODS OF DIVIDING AND CONTROLLING THE COMPETENCIES OF THE UNION, WHI-Paper 6/01, Oct. 2001 pp. 13 et seq., avalaible at: http://www.whi-berlin.de/ (go to WHI papers 2001, last visited 1 April 2002).Google Scholar

(12) ECJ Case 43/75 (Defrenne v. Société Anonyme Belge de Navigation Aérienne), ECR 1976, 445.Google Scholar

(13) ECJ Case C-450/93 (Kalanke v. Freie Hansestadt Bremen), ECR 1995 I-3051.Google Scholar

(14) ECJ Case C-180/95 (Nils Dreahmenpaehl v. Urania Immobilienservice), ECR 1997 I-2195.Google Scholar

(15) ECJ Case C-285/98 (Tanja Kreil v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland), ECR 2000 I-69.Google Scholar

ECJ Case 22/70 (Commission vs. Council), ECR 1971, 263; this decision is well known as the “ERTA”-ruling, or “AETR” in Germany.Google Scholar