Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:51:59.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Derrida and Foucault On Sovereignty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In his final publication Derrida argues for a rather wide notion of the concept of sovereignty. Sovereigns are not only public officers and dignitaries, or those who invest them with sovereign power – we all are sovereigns, without exception, insofar the sovereign function is nothing but the rationale of all metaphysics, anchored in a certain capability, in the ability to do something, in a power or potency that transfers and realizes itself, that shows itself in possession, property, the power or authority of the master, be it the master of the house or in the city or state, despot, be it the master over himself, and thus master over his passions which have to be mastered just like the many-headed mass in the political arena. Derrida thinks the sovereign with Aristotle: the prima causa, the unmoved mover. It has been often remarked that philosophy here openly reveals itself as political theology. Derrida thus refers to the famous lines of the Iliad, where Ulysses warns of the sovereignty of the many: “it is not well that there should be many masters; one man must be supreme – one king to whom the son of scheming Saturn has given the scepter of sovereignty over you all.”

Type
Articles: Special Issue: A Dedication to Jacques Derrida – Theory
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Quoted by Aristotle at the end of book 12 of his Metaphysics (1076a).Google Scholar

2 Jacques Derrida. Schurken [Rogues] 34-35 (2003) [not yet translated into English].Google Scholar

3 Id. at 28.Google Scholar

4 Id. at 42.Google Scholar

5 Id. at 190-191.Google Scholar

6 Id. at 30.Google Scholar

7 Id. at 64.Google Scholar

8 Id. at 47.Google Scholar

9 Id. at 53.Google Scholar

10 Id. at 60.Google Scholar

11 Luraghi, Nino, Sterben wie ein Tyrann [Die like a Tyrant], in Tyrannis und Verführung [Tyrannis and Seduction] 91-114 (Wolfgang Pircher and Martin Treml. eds. 2000).Google Scholar

12 Id. at 144.Google Scholar

13 Id. at 141-142.Google Scholar

14 Carl Schmitt, Political Theology – Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty 5 (George Schwab trans., 1988).Google Scholar

15 For his notion of sovereignty and the state of exception, see recently Giorgio Agamben, State of Exception (Kevin Attell trans., 2004); see also Interview with Giorgio Agamben – Life, A Work of Art Without an Author: The State of Exception, the Administration of Disorder and Private Life, 5 German Law Journal 609 (2004), at http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=437.Google Scholar

16 See Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer – Sovereign Power and the Bare Life (Daniel Heller-Rozean trans., 1998) (German translation: Homo Sacer. Souveräne Macht und Bloßes Leben (2002)).Google Scholar

17 Id. at 44.Google Scholar

18 Derrida, supra note 2, at 101.Google Scholar

19 Id. at 102.Google Scholar

20 Compare Michel Foucault, Geschichte der Gouvernementalität I [History of Governmentality] (2004).Google Scholar

21 Titus Livius, Ab urbe condita. Liber I:4Google Scholar

22 Id. at I:8.Google Scholar

23 Foucault, Michel, “Society Must Be Defended.” Lectures at the Collège De France 1975 – 1976 34 (David Macey trans., 2003) (2003).Google Scholar

24 Sahlins, Marshal, Der Fremde als König oder Dumézil unter den Fidschi-Insulanern [The Stranger as King, or, Dumézil amongst the Fidschi], in Marshal Sahlins, Inseln der Geschichte [Islands of History] 95 (1992).Google Scholar

25 Id. at 79.Google Scholar

26 Id. at 83.Google Scholar

27 Id. at 81.Google Scholar

28 Foucault, supra note 23, at 68.Google Scholar

29 Id. at 73.Google Scholar

30 Id. at 74Google Scholar

31 Id. at 47.Google Scholar

32 Georges Dumézil, Quirinus. La ville et l'empire, 195.Google Scholar