No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Kosovo's declaration of independence in 2008 and the United Nation's claim that UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) (“Resolution 1244”) remains in effect have resulted in the unique case of two competing legal systems, both of which claim legitimacy and supremacy in Kosovo. While Kosovar authorities claim to exercise exclusive and sovereign authority over Kosovo based on the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, the UN, acting through the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (“UNMIK”), maintains that Resolution 1244 vests administrative authority over Kosovo in the Special Representative of the Secretary-General (“SRSG”). This conflict is best exemplified in a number of judgments rendered by the Special Chamber of the Supreme Court of Kosovo on Privatization Agency Related Matters (“Special Chamber”) and the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo. The purpose of this Article is to illustrate the problems that have emerged in the process of the creation of a new legal system in Kosovo and the emergence of a new rule of recognition which is reflected in conflicting judgments of the Special Chamber and the Constitutional Court.
1 See Special Chamber of the Supreme Court of Kosovo on Kosovo Trust Agency Related Matters, No. ASC-09-0089 (Feb. 4, 2010); Special Chamber of the Supreme Court of Kosovo on Privatization Agency Related Matters, Nos. SCC-08-0227, SCC-08-0226 (Dec.27, 2012); Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo, No. KI 25/10 (Mar. 31, 2011).Google Scholar
2 See H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law 98 (1961).Google Scholar
3 S.C. Res. 1244, para. 10, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1244 (June 10, 1999).Google Scholar
4 See id. at paras. 11(e), 11(f).Google Scholar
5 See UNMIK Regulation No. 1999/1, amended by UNMIK Regulation No. 2000/54, § 1.Google Scholar
6 See UNMIK Regulation No. 2000/54, § 3.Google Scholar
7 See Coronna, M.E., The Concept of Social Property and the Rights of the Foreign Investor in Yugoslavia, 11 Rev. Socialist L. 227, 230 (1985).Google Scholar
8 See Medjad, Karim, The Fate of the Yugoslav Model: A Case Against Legal Conformity, 52 Am. J. Comp. L. 287, 290 (2004).Google Scholar
9 See Knudsen, Rita Augestad, Privatization in Kosovo: The International Project 1999-2008, Norwegian Inst. Int'l Aff. 29 (2010).Google Scholar
10 See Muharremi, Robert, The Role of the United Nations and the European Union in the Privatization of Kosovo's Socially Owned Enterprises, 14 German L.J. 889, 898 (2013).Google Scholar
11 See UNMIK Regulation No. 2002/12, § 1.Google Scholar
12 See UNMIK Regulation No. 2002/13, § 4.Google Scholar
13 See Muharremi, , supra note 10, at 903, 909.Google Scholar
14 See U.N. Secretary-General, Letter Dated 26 March 26, 2007 Addressed to the President of the Security Council, U.N. Doc. S/2007/168/Add.1 (Mar. 26, 2007) [hereinafter Settlement Proposal].Google Scholar
15 See Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, June 15, 2008, art. 143.Google Scholar
16 See Proposal, Settlement, supra note 14, at Annex VII, art. 2, 4.Google Scholar
17 See Law No. 04/L-034 on the Privatization Agency of Kosovo, art. 1 (2011).Google Scholar
18 See Id. Google Scholar
19 See U.N. Secretary-General, Report of the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, para. 4, U.N. Doc. S/2008/354 (June 12, 2008).Google Scholar
20 See Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo, Case No. KI 25/10, at 20 (Mar. 31, 2011).Google Scholar
21 See id. at 21.Google Scholar
22 See Special Chamber of the Supreme Court of Kosovo on Kosovo Trust Agency Related Matters, No. ASC-09-0089, 3 (Feb. 4, 2010).Google Scholar
23 See id. Google Scholar
24 See Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo, Case No. KI 25/10, at 53 (Mar. 31, 2011).Google Scholar
25 See Law No. 04/L-033 On the Special Chamber of the Supreme Court of Kosovo on Privatization Agency Related Matters, Official Gazette of the Republic of Kosovo No. 20 (Sept. 22, 2011).Google Scholar
26 See id. at art. 2.Google Scholar
27 See id. at art. 3.1.Google Scholar
28 See U.N. Secretary-General, Report on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, para. 31, U.N. Doc. S/2012/72 (Jan. 31, 2008).Google Scholar
29 See Settlement Proposal, supra note 14, at Annex IX, 2.3.Google Scholar
30 See U.N. Secretary-General, Report on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, para. 8, U.N. Doc. S/2008/354 (June 12, 2008); see also U.N. Secretary-General, Report on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, para. 2, U.N. Doc. S/2011/675 (Oct. 31, 2011); U.N. President of the S.C., Statement Dated Nov. 26, 2008, U.N. Doc. S/PRST/2008/44 (Nov. 26, 2008).Google Scholar
31 See U.N. Secretary-General, Report on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, para. 13, U.N. Doc. S/2009/149 (Mar. 17, 2009).Google Scholar
32 See International Steering Group for Kosovo, Communiqué of the Sixteenth and Final Meeting (Sept. 10, 2012).Google Scholar
33 See Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo Regarding the Ending of International Supervision of Independence of Kosovo, Official Gazette of the Republic of Kosovo (Sept. 7, 2012).Google Scholar
34 See Law No. 04/L-148 On the Ratification of the International Agreement between the Republic of Kosovo and the European Union on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, Official Gazette of the Republic of Kosovo No. 25 (Sept. 7, 2012).Google Scholar
35 See id. Google Scholar
36 See U.N. Secretary-General, Report on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, para. 2, U.N. Doc. S/2013/444 (July 26, 2013).Google Scholar
37 See Special Chamber of the Supreme Court of Kosovo on Privatization Agency Related Matters, No. SCC-08-0227 (Dec. 27, 2012).Google Scholar
38 See id. at 1.Google Scholar
39 See id. Google Scholar
40 See id. Google Scholar
41 See id. at 2.Google Scholar
42 See id. at 3.Google Scholar
43 See id. Google Scholar
44 See id. Google Scholar
45 See id. at 4.Google Scholar
46 See id. Google Scholar
47 See id. Google Scholar
48 See Special Chamber of the Supreme Court of Kosovo on Kosovo Trust Agency Related Matters, No. ASC-09-0025 (July 24, 2010).Google Scholar
49 Id. at 11.Google Scholar
50 See id. Google Scholar
51 See Id. Google Scholar
52 Id. at 11–12.Google Scholar
53 See Special Chamber of the Supreme Court of Kosovo on Privatization Agency Related Matters, Nos. SCC-08-0227, SCC-08-0226, at 8 (Dec.27, 2012).Google Scholar
54 See id. Google Scholar
55 See id. Google Scholar
56 See id. Google Scholar
57 See id. Google Scholar
58 See id. Google Scholar
59 See id. Google Scholar
60 See id. Google Scholar
61 See id. at 6.Google Scholar
62 See id. Google Scholar
63 See Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo, Case No. KI 25/10, para. 20 (Mar. 31, 2011).Google Scholar
64 See id. at para. 24.Google Scholar
65 See id. at para. 53.Google Scholar
66 See id. at paras. 59–60.Google Scholar
67 See Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo, June 15, 2008, art. 102.3.Google Scholar
68 See id. at art. 112.1.Google Scholar
69 See id. at art. 116.1.Google Scholar
70 See Settlement Proposal, supra note 14, at annex VII, art. 2.Google Scholar
71 See id. Google Scholar
72 See id. at art. 15.1(a).Google Scholar
73 See id. at art. 15.1(b), 15.1(e).Google Scholar
74 See id. at art. 15.1(g).Google Scholar
75 See Law No. 03/L-067 on the Privatization Agency of Kosovo (2008).Google Scholar
76 See Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo, Case No. KI 25/10, at 59 (Mar. 31, 2011).Google Scholar
77 Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law 120 (1961).Google Scholar
78 See id. at 98.Google Scholar
79 See id. at 103.Google Scholar
80 See id. at 100.Google Scholar
81 See id. at 101.Google Scholar
82 See id. at 108–09.Google Scholar
83 See id. at 110.Google Scholar
84 See id. at 115–17.Google Scholar
85 See supra note 1.Google Scholar
86 See Hart, , supra note 2, at 120.Google Scholar
87 See Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo, No. KI 25/10, 11 (Mar. 31, 2011).Google Scholar